Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects
Susan Athey,Guido W. Imbens +1 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This paper provides a data-driven approach to partition the data into subpopulations that differ in the magnitude of their treatment effects, and proposes an “honest” approach to estimation, whereby one sample is used to construct the partition and another to estimate treatment effects for each subpopulation.Abstract:
In this paper we propose methods for estimating heterogeneity in causal effects in experimental and observational studies and for conducting hypothesis tests about the magnitude of differences in treatment effects across subsets of the population. We provide a data-driven approach to partition the data into subpopulations that differ in the magnitude of their treatment effects. The approach enables the construction of valid confidence intervals for treatment effects, even with many covariates relative to the sample size, and without “sparsity” assumptions. We propose an “honest” approach to estimation, whereby one sample is used to construct the partition and another to estimate treatment effects for each subpopulation. Our approach builds on regression tree methods, modified to optimize for goodness of fit in treatment effects and to account for honest estimation. Our model selection criterion anticipates that bias will be eliminated by honest estimation and also accounts for the effect of making additional splits on the variance of treatment effect estimates within each subpopulation. We address the challenge that the “ground truth” for a causal effect is not observed for any individual unit, so that standard approaches to cross-validation must be modified. Through a simulation study, we show that for our preferred method honest estimation results in nominal coverage for 90% confidence intervals, whereas coverage ranges between 74% and 84% for nonhonest approaches. Honest estimation requires estimating the model with a smaller sample size; the cost in terms of mean squared error of treatment effects for our preferred method ranges between 7–22%.read more
Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
70 years of machine learning in geoscience in review.
TL;DR: A review of the development of machine learning in geoscience can be found in this paper, which explores the shift from mathematical fundamentals and knowledge in software development towards skills in model validation, applied statistics, and integrated subject matter expertise.
Posted Content
Invariant Representation Learning for Treatment Effect Estimation
TL;DR: Nearly Invariant Causal Estimation (NICE) is developed, which uses invariant risk minimization (IRM) to learn a representation of the covariates that, under some assumptions, strips out bad controls but preserves sufficient information to adjust for confounding.
Journal ArticleDOI
An Instrumental Variable Forest Approach for Detecting Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Observational Studies
TL;DR: This work develops a technique that incorporates the instrumental variable method into a causal tree to correct for potential endogeneity biases in heterogeneous treatment effect analysis using observational studies and shows that this approach has better coverage rates and smaller mean-squared errors than the conventional causal tree.
Journal ArticleDOI
Machine learning analysis plans for randomised controlled trials: detecting treatment effect heterogeneity with strict control of type I error
TL;DR: A novel analysis strategy for detecting TEH in randomised data using ML methods, whilst ensuring proper control of the false positive discovery rate is presented, which finds that artesunate provides a differential benefit to patients with high numbers of circulating ring stage parasites.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Automated Local Regression Discontinuity Design Discovery
TL;DR: This work develops the first statistical machine learning approach for automatically discovering regression discontinuity designs (RDDs) in arbitrary dimensional data and demonstrates robust performance under adverse conditions including unobserved variables, substantial noise, and model.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Random Forests
TL;DR: Internal estimates monitor error, strength, and correlation and these are used to show the response to increasing the number of features used in the forest, and are also applicable to regression.
Journal ArticleDOI
Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso
TL;DR: A new method for estimation in linear models called the lasso, which minimizes the residual sum of squares subject to the sum of the absolute value of the coefficients being less than a constant, is proposed.
Book
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
TL;DR: Setting of the learning problem consistency of learning processes bounds on the rate of convergence ofLearning processes controlling the generalization ability of learning process constructing learning algorithms what is important in learning theory?
Statistical learning theory
TL;DR: Presenting a method for determining the necessary and sufficient conditions for consistency of learning process, the author covers function estimates from small data pools, applying these estimations to real-life problems, and much more.
Journal ArticleDOI
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
TL;DR: The authors discusses the central role of propensity scores and balancing scores in the analysis of observational studies and shows that adjustment for the scalar propensity score is sufficient to remove bias due to all observed covariates.
Related Papers (5)
Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests
Stefan Wager,Susan Athey +1 more