scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Removal and Recovery of Phosphate From Water Using Sorption

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A comprehensive and critical review of the literature on the effectiveness of a number of sorbents, especially some novel ones that have recently emerged, in removing and recovering phosphate can be found in this article.
Abstract
Sorption is an effective, reliable, and environmentally friendly treatment process for the removal of phosphorus from wastewater sources which otherwise can cause eutrophication of receiving waters. Phosphorus in wastewater, if economically recovered, can partly overcome the future scarcity of phosphorus resulting from exhaustion of natural phosphate rock reserves. The authors present a comprehensive and critical review of the literature on the effectiveness of a number of sorbents, especially some novel ones that have recently emerged, in removing and recovering phosphate. Mechanisms and thermodynamics of sorption, as well as regeneration of sorbents for reuse using acids, bases, and salts, are critically examined.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

1
Removal and recovery of phosphate from water using sorption
1
2
Paripurnanda Loganathan
a
, Saravanamuthu Vigneswaran
a
, Jaya Kandasamy
a
and Nanthi S
3
Bolan
b
4
a
Faculty of
Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
5
b
Centre for Environmental Risk, Assessment and Remediation, University of South Australia,
6
Adelaide, Australia
7
8
ABSTRACT
9
Sorption is an effective, reliable, and environmentally friendly treatment process for the
10
removal of phosphorus from wastewater sources which otherwise can cause eutrophication
11
of receiving waters. Phosphorus in wastewater, if economically recovered, can partly
12
overcome the future scarcity of phosphorus resulting from exhaustion of natural phosphate
13
rock reserves. The authors present a comprehensive and critical review of the literature on
14
the effectiveness of a number of sorbents, especially some novel ones that have recently
15
emerged, in removing and recovering phosphate. Mechanisms and thermodynamics of
16
sorption, as well as regeneration of sorbents for reuse using acids, bases, and salts, are
17
critically examined.
18
KEY WORDS: adsorption, phosphate sorption, phosphate desorption, phosphate recovery,
19
sorption mechanism, sorption thermodynamics, sorbent, water treatment, wastewater
20
treatment
21
RUNNING HEAD: Phosphate removal and recovery from water
22

2
CONTENTS
23
1. Introduction 3
24
2. Sorption mechanisms 7
25
2.1. Ion exchange 8
26
2.2. Ligand exchange 8
27
2.3. Hydrogen bonding 9
28
2.4. Surface precipitation 9
29
2.5. Diffusion 10
30
3. Sorption efficiency assessment methods 12
31
3.1. Batch method 12
32
3.2. Column method 13
33
3.3. Continuous stirring tank reactor method 16
34
35
4. Sorbents 16
36
4.1. Inorganic sorbents 16
37
4.1.1. Metal oxides and hydroxides 17
38
4.1.2. Calcium and magnesium carbonates and hydroxides 23
39
4.1.3. Layered double hydroxides 25
40
4.2. Organic sorbents 28
41
4.2.1. Activated carbon 28
42
4.2.2. Anion exchange resins 31
43
4.2.3. Other organic compounds 32
44
4.3. Industrial by-products 35
45
4.3.1. Red mud 36
46
4.3.2. Slags 37
47

3
4.3.3. Fly ash 39
48
4.3.4. Other by-products 41
49
4.4. Biological wastes 42
50
5. Sorption thermodynamics 46
51
6. Phosphate desorption and sorbent regeneration 47
52
7. Phosphate recovery 49
53
8. Summary and conclusions 51
54
9. Acknowledgments 53
55
10. References 53
56
57
1. Introduction
58
Globally, clean water for domestic, agricultural, and recreational uses, as well as for
59
potable supply, is increasingly endangered due to water pollution, climate change and rising
60
human needs. Stringent legislation and regulations exist in many countries to reduce
61
pollutants bolstered by anthropogenic activities that thresten natural water bodies. Because of
62
the limited availability of high quality water resources, reclamation and reuse of treated
63
wastewater have become important in the sustainable management of this natural resource.
64
Phosphorus (P) is a major nutrient contaminant in water. It enters water bodies
65
through mining, industrial and agricultural activities, and sewage discharges. Excessive
66
concentrations of P in water cause eutrophication (Hussain et al. 2011; Paleka and Deliyanni
67
2009; Xu et al. 2010a), which is defined as the enrichment of water bodies by nutrients and
68
the consequent deterioration of quality due to the luxuriant growth of plants such as algae and
69
its repercussions on the ecological balance of the waters affected (Yeoman et al. 1988).
70
Although both nitrogen (N) and P are considered to be the limiting nutrients for
71

4
eutrophication, some algae are efficient in the fixation of atmospheric N and hence P often
72
becomes the potentially limiting nutrient in freshwaters (Yeoman et al. 1988; Zeng et al.
73
2004). In advanced stages of eutrophication, dissolved oxygen can become depleted to
74
dangerously low levels causing fish death when algae decay (Awual et al. 2011; Long et al.
75
2011). The large algae biomass produced by eutrophication can also affect water treatment by
76
blocking filters or passing through them causing bad odour and taste in treated water
77
(Collingwood 1977). Blue-green algae can produce compounds that are toxic to fish and
78
other aquatic life (Davis 1980). These conditions are also potentially risky to human health,
79
resulting from consumption of shellfish contaminated with algal toxins or direct exposure to
80
waterborne toxins (EPA 2009).
81
To control eutrophication the US EPA has recommended that total P should not
82
exceed 0.05 mg P/L in a stream at a point where it enters a lake or reservoir and should not
83
exceed 0.1 mg/L in streams that do not discharge directly into lakes or reservoirs (Mueller
84
and Helsel 1996). The European Union (EU) considers that the cut-off for total P
85
concentration between at risk and not risk of eutrophication in lakes is < 10 µg/L to > 100
86
µg/L, and for rivers, total P concentration below 0.01-0.07 µg/L is considered excellent
87
waters (European Commission 2009). The Australian and New Zealand water quality
88
guidelines recommend that Australian upland rivers, depending on the region, should have a
89
total P concentration < 0.01-0.02 mg P/L, low land rivers < 0.005-0.01 mg P/L, freshwater
90
lakes and reservoirs < 0.01-0.025 mg P/L, and estuaries < 0.02-0.10 mg P/L (ANZECC
91
2000). The corresponding limits for New Zealand are 0.026 mg P/L for upland rivers and
92
0.033 mg P/L for lowland rivers (ANZECC 2000).
93
Phosphorus commonly originates from human and animal wastes, food-processing
94
effluents, commercial fertilisers, agricultural land runoffs and household detergents. In water
95
and wastewater, P is present in the form of orthophosphate, polyphosphates and organic
96

5
phosphorus. Polyphosphates and organic P are converted to orthophosphate by hydrolysis/or
97
microbial mobilisation (Weiner 2008). Orthophosphate is soluble and considered to be the
98
only type of P that is directly assimilated by most plants, including algae. Due to their strong
99
adsorption onto inorganic particles they also occur adsorbed onto particulate
100
matter/sediments in water. A proportion of P in detergents and cleaning compounds contains
101
tripolyphosphate, which is slowly mineralised to orthophosphate (Zhou et al. 2011). Early
102
work by Clescere and Lee (1965) showed that the hydrolysis of condensed phosphates to
103
orthophosphate can take hours or days in the presence of various microorganisms. The
104
chemical form and ionic charge of orthophosphate change with the pH of water in accordance
105
with their pK values (pK
1
= 2.15, pK
2
= 7.20, pK
3
= 12.33) (Chitrakar et al. 2006b; Streat et
106
al. 2008; Weiner 2008). The pH also influences the surface charge characteristics of soils and
107
sediments, thereby controlling P sorption onto these materials. Raising pH decreases the
108
positive charges and increases the negative charges on the surfaces of soils and sediments,
109
affecting the energies (coulombic attraction vs coulombic repulsion) of P binding.
110
Consequently, pH is expected to influence the physicochemical behaviour of P in water.
111
112
Phosphorus in wastewater sources must be removed or reduced to avoid
113
eutrophication of receiving waters such as rivers and lakes. The ecological recovery of the
114
receiving water bodies after prolonged eutrophication can be very slow even after the
115
solution P is reduced (Vollenweider 1968; Yeoman et al. 1988). This is because much of the
116
P may be temporally trapped in the sediments in water bodies and released slowly into the
117
water.
118
Phosphorus removed from water can be a source of raw material for the phosphate
119
industry, especially the production of phosphate fertilisers for agriculture. If a successful
120
method is developed for effective and economical recovery of P, the current thinking that P is
121

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Relevance of Phosphorus and Iron Chemistry to the Recovery of Phosphorus from Wastewater: A Review

TL;DR: It is suggested that the current poor understanding of iron and phosphorus chemistry in wastewater systems is preventing processes being developed to recover phosphorus from iron-phosphorus rich wastes like municipal wastewater sludge.
Journal ArticleDOI

Selective Phosphate Removal from Water and Wastewater using Sorption: Process Fundamentals and Removal Mechanisms.

TL;DR: The most fundamental aspects of selective phosphate removal processes are discussed and gains from the latest developments of phosphate-selective sorbents are highlighted, along with a discussion of some overlooked facts regarding the development of high-performance sor bents for selective phosphate Removal from water and wastewater.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effectiveness and mechanisms of phosphate adsorption on iron-modified biochars derived from waste activated sludge.

TL;DR: Different iron modification was used to improve the phosphate adsorption capacity of waste activated sludge (WAS)-based biochar, and X-ray diffraction analyzes indicated that the iron in FeCl3-impregnated WAS-basedBiochar existed mainly in amorphous phase, as hematite andAmorphous hydroxides forms, which was of great benefit to the phosphate Adsorption.
Journal ArticleDOI

Performance and prospects of different adsorbents for phosphorus uptake and recovery from water

TL;DR: A review of the literature about phosphate removal from water through adsorption and subsequent recovery through desorption or direct use of the phosphorus-loaded adsorbent as a fertilizer can be found in this article.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—A critical review

TL;DR: Strong acids and bases seem to be the best desorbing agents to produce arsenic concentrates, and some commercial adsorbents which include resins, gels, silica, treated silica tested for arsenic removal come out to be superior.
Journal ArticleDOI

A handful of carbon

TL;DR: On the climate change mitigation front, the incorporation of ‘biochar’ into the soil is one idea gaining support, and Johannes Lehmann argues that trapping biomass carbon in this way is more effective than storing it in plants and trees that will one day decompose.
Journal ArticleDOI

Transitional Adsorption and Partition of Nonpolar and Polar Aromatic Contaminants by Biochars of Pine Needles with Different Pyrolytic Temperatures

TL;DR: Biochars, produced by pyrolysis of pine needles at different temperatures, were characterized by elemental analysis, BET-N2 surface areas and FTIR, and Sorption isotherms of naphthalene, nitrobenzene, and m-dinitrobenZene from water to the biochars were compared.
Journal ArticleDOI

Application of layered double hydroxides for removal of oxyanions: A review

TL;DR: This review critically identifies the shortcomings in current research on LDHs, such as the common weaknesses in the adopted methodology, discrepancies among reported results and ambiguous conclusions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Recent advances in removing phosphorus from wastewater and its future use as fertilizer (1997-2003).

TL;DR: This comprehensive review summarizes the current status in phosphorus-removal technologies from the most common approaches, like metal precipitation, constructed wetland systems, adsorption by various microorganisms either in a free state or immobilized in polysaccharide gels, to enhanced biological phosphorus removal using activated sludge systems, and several innovative engineering solutions.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (1)
Q1. What are the contributions in this paper?

The authors present a comprehensive and critical review of the literature on 14 the effectiveness of a number of sorbents, especially some novel ones that have recently 15 emerged, in removing and recovering phosphate.