scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Results suggest the K-SADS-PL generates reliable and valid child psychiatric diagnoses.
Abstract
Objective To describe the psychometric properties of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime version (K-SADS-PL) interview, which surveys additional disorders not assessed in prior K-SADS, contains improved probes and anchor points, includes diagnosis-specific impairment ratings, generates DSM-III-R and DSM-IV diagnoses, and divides symptoms surveyed into a screening interview and five diagnostic supplements. Method Subjects were 55 psychiatric outpatients and 11 normal controls (aged 7 through 17 years). Both parents and children were used as informants. Concurrent validity of the screen criteria and the K-SADS-PL diagnoses was assessed against standard self-report scales. Interrater ( n = 15) and test-retest ( n = 20) reliability data were also collected (mean retest interval: 18 days; range: 2 to 38 days). Results Rating scale data support the concurrent validity of screens and K-SADS-PL diagnoses. Interrater agreement in scoring screens and diagnoses was high (range: 93% to 100%). Test-retest reliability κ coefficients were in the excellent range for present and/or lifetime diagnoses of major depression, any bipolar, generalized anxiety, conduct, and oppositional defiant disorder (.77 to 1.00) and in the good range for present diagnoses of posttraumatic stress disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (.63 to .67). Conclusion Results suggest the K-SADS-PL generates reliable and valid child psychiatric diagnoses. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry , 1997, 36(7): 980–988.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Lifetime and 12-Month Prevalence of Bipolar Spectrum Disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication

TL;DR: This study presents the first prevalence estimates of the BPD spectrum in a probability sample of the United States, and finds subthreshold BPD is common, clinically significant, and underdetected in treatment settings.
Journal ArticleDOI

Twelve‐month and lifetime prevalence and lifetime morbid risk of anxiety and mood disorders in the United States.

TL;DR: Estimates of 12‐month and lifetime prevalence and of lifetime morbid risk (LMR) of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM‐IV‐TR) anxiety and mood disorders are presented based on US epidemiological surveys among people aged 13+.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comorbid Psychiatric Disorders in Children with Autism: Interview Development and Rates of Disorders

TL;DR: The Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia was modified for use in children and adolescents with autism by developing additional screening questions and coding options that reflect the presentation of psychiatric disorders in autism spectrum disorders.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cognitive impairment in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

TL;DR: It is argued that remediation of cognitive impairment and alleviation of depressive symptoms each play an important role in improving outcome for patients with depression, and cognitive impairment represents a core feature of depression that cannot be considered an epiphenomenon that is entirely secondary to symptoms of low mood.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A comparison of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III—R and clinical diagnoses.

TL;DR: The patient version of the SCID appears to produce results that are very different from clinical practice, which, in turn, may be influenced strongly by location, and there was considerable variability among the major diagnostic categories.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents for use in general population samples

TL;DR: Evaluative data on the use of the Diagnostic Interview for Children and AdolescentsRevised (DICAR) to classify DSM-IIIR disorders in the general population suggest that these disorders may be overidentified.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rules for making psychiatric diagnoses in children on the basis of multiple sources of information: preliminary strategies.

TL;DR: In this study, the authors review the decision-making process used in the assignment of summary psychiatric diagnoses based on the child and parent reports, as well as a number of other sources of information about the child.
Journal ArticleDOI

Screening for childhood psychopathology in the community using the Child Behavior Checklist.

TL;DR: The data indicate that in using the CBCL for screening for psychopathology in children, parent information is most informative, particularly for children in the adolescent age group, Nevertheless, the data also reinforce the need to obtain teacher information with the Teacher Report Form to enhance screening purposes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Issues of validity in the diagnostic interview schedule

TL;DR: The article presents a general framework organizing the process of diagnostic validation and discusses strategies for research seeking to validate psychiatric diagnoses achieved through the Diagnostic Interview Schedule.