scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The objective of this article is to introduce the primary care physicians about the concept of systematic reviews and meta-analysis, outlining why they are important, describing their methods and terminologies used, and helping them with the skills to recognize and understand a reliable review which will be helpful for their day-to-day clinical practice and research activities.
Abstract
Healthcare decisions for individual patients and for public health policies should be informed by the best available research evidence. The practice of evidence-based medicine is the integration of individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research and patient's values and expectations. Primary care physicians need evidence for both clinical practice and for public health decision making. The evidence comes from good reviews which is a state-of-the-art synthesis of current evidence on a given research question. Given the explosion of medical literature, and the fact that time is always scarce, review articles play a vital role in decision making in evidence-based medical practice. Given that most clinicians and public health professionals do not have the time to track down all the original articles, critically read them, and obtain the evidence they need for their questions, systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines may be their best source of evidence. Systematic reviews aim to identify, evaluate, and summarize the findings of all relevant individual studies over a health-related issue, thereby making the available evidence more accessible to decision makers. The objective of this article is to introduce the primary care physicians about the concept of systematic reviews and meta-analysis, outlining why they are important, describing their methods and terminologies used, and thereby helping them with the skills to recognize and understand a reliable review which will be helpful for their day-to-day clinical practice and research activities.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Guidelines for including grey literature and conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering

TL;DR: The provided MLR guidelines will support researchers to effectively and efficiently conduct new MLRs in any area of SE and are recommended to utilize in their MLR studies and then share their lessons learned and experiences.
Journal ArticleDOI

Long-term Systemic Corticosteroid Exposure: A Systematic Literature Review.

TL;DR: Although doses of long-term corticosteroids have fallen over the past several decades in response to AEs, dose reduction may not be a sufficient solution, suggesting a need for further research to fill current data gaps, as well as a potential need for alternative treatment options.
Journal ArticleDOI

Integrated STEM Education: A Systematic Review of Instructional Practices in Secondary Education

TL;DR: In this article, a well-defined framework for instructional practices in integrated STEM in secondary education is provided, based on the results of a systematic review of existing literature, which contains five key principles: integration of STEM content, problem-centered learning, inquiry-based learning, designbased learning and cooperative learning.
Journal ArticleDOI

Blockchain in healthcare: A systematic literature review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda

TL;DR: It is suggested that future research can facilitate the widespread deployment of blockchain applications to address critical issues related to medical diagnostics, legal compliance, avoiding fraud, and improving patient care in cases of remote monitoring or emergencies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Diseases diagnosis using fuzzy logic methods: A systematic and meta-analysis review.

TL;DR: This study approved the effectiveness of applying different fuzzy methods in diseases diagnosis process, presenting new insights for researchers about what kind of diseases which have been more focused will help to determine the diagnostic aspects of medical disciplines that are being neglected.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

TL;DR: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is introduced, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.

TL;DR: Evidence Based Medicine (IBM) as discussed by the authors is the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients, which is a hot topic for clinicians, public health practitioners, purchasers, planners and the public.
Related Papers (5)