scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

The motion aftereffect: A modern perspective.

TLDR
More than 200 papers have been published on motion aftereffect (MAE), largely inspired by improved techniques for examining brain electrophysiology and by emerging new theories of motion perception as discussed by the authors.
Abstract
Motion perception lies at the heart of the scientific study of vision. The motion aftereffect (MAE), probably the best known phenomenon in the study of visual illusions, is the appearance of directional movement in a stationary object or scene after the viewer has been exposed to visual motion in the opposite direction. For example, after one has looked at a waterfall for a period of time, the scene beside the waterfall may appear to move upward when ones gaze is transferred to it. Although the phenomenon seems simple, research has revealed surprising complexities in the underlying mechanisms, and offered general lessons about how the brain processes visual information. In the last decade alone, more than 200 papers have been published on MAE, largely inspired by improved techniques for examining brain electrophysiology and by emerging new theories of motion perception. The contributors to this volume are all active researchers who have helped to shape the modern conception of MAE. Contributors: David Alais, Stuart Anstis, Patrick Cavanagh, Jody Culham, John Harris, Michelle Kwas, Timothy Ledgeway, George Mather, Bernard Moulden, Michael Niedeggen, Shin'ya Nishida, Allan Pantle, Robert Patterson, Jane Raymond, Michael Swanston, Peter Thompson, Frans Verstraten, Michael von Grunau, Nicolas Wade, Eugene Wist.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI

TL;DR: An overview of the current state of fMRI is given, and the current understanding of the haemodynamic signals and the constraints they impose on neuroimaging data interpretation are presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects

TL;DR: It is found that exposure to an individual face for a few seconds generated a significant and precise bias in the subsequent perception of face identity, suggesting that the encoding of faces and other complex patterns draws upon contrastive neural mechanisms that reference the central tendency of the stimulus category.
Journal ArticleDOI

Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits.

TL;DR: This review focuses on a rapid form of experience-dependent plasticity that follows adaptation, the presentation of a particular stimulus or ensemble of stimuli for periods ranging from tens of milliseconds to minutes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity

TL;DR: It is reported that after exposure to a fixed audiovisual time lag for several minutes, human participants showed shifts in their subjective simultaneity responses toward that particular lag, suggesting that the brain attempts to adjust subjective simultaneousity across different modalities by detecting and reducing time lags between inputs that likely arise from the same physical events.
Journal ArticleDOI

Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals

TL;DR: It is found that f MRIa provides novel insight into neural representations in the human brain, however, network responses in general and adaptation in particular are more complex than is often assumed, and an unequivocal interpretation of fMRIa results can be achieved only with great care.
Related Papers (5)