scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

The World of Goods

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The World of Goods as mentioned in this paper is a classic of economic anthropology whose insights remain compelling and urgent, arguing that poverty is caused as much by the erosion of local communities and networks as it is by lack of possessions and contrast small-scale with large-scale consumption in the household.
Abstract
It is well-understood that the consumption of goods plays an important, symbolic role in the way human beings communicate, create identity, and establish relationships. What is less well-known is that the pattern of their flow shapes society in fundamental ways. In this book the renowned anthropologist Mary Douglas and economist Baron Isherwood overturn arguments about consumption that rely on received economic and psychological explanations. They ask new questions about why people save, why they spend, what they buy, and why they sometimes-but not always-make fine distinctions about quality. Instead of regarding consumption as a private means of satisfying one’s preferences, they show how goods are a vital information system, used by human beings to fulfill their intentions towards one another. They also consider the implications of the social role of goods for a new vision for social policy, arguing that poverty is caused as much by the erosion of local communities and networks as it is by lack of possessions, and contrast small-scale with large-scale consumption in the household. A radical rethinking of consumerism, inequality and social capital, The World of Goods is a classic of economic anthropology whose insights remain compelling and urgent. This Routledge Classics edition includes a new foreword by Richard Wilk. "Forget that commodities are good for eating, clothing, and shelter; forget their usefulness and try instead the idea that commodities are good for thinking." – Mary Douglas and Baron Isherwood

read more

Citations
More filters
Posted Content

Cultural and Economic Approaches to Fertility : A Proper Marriage or a Mesalliance?

Abstract: Economic models have organized much fertility research particularly over the last 2 decades. The usual formulation of these models assumes that preferences are fixed and fertility differences are explained by differences in opportunities (constraints). Yet some interpretations of evidence of fertility decline inconsistent with economic models and have led to explicit challenges to them. These challenges generally take 2 forms--an emphasis on diffusion and an emphasis on culture. This paper addresses the consistency of the empirical findings and the interpretations drawn from then with economic models. In particular the authors discuss the roles that diffusion may play in economic models and the relationship between cultural and economic explanations of fertility. The fit between diffusion and economic models depends on what is diffusing. Here the literature is diffuse variously identifying new information new attitudes regarding ideal family size or the new values legitimating fertility control within marriage. The distinction is critical for the issue considered here since the diffusion of information about birth control technology is consistent with a household production model. Differences in information about opportunities can explain differences in behavior. The diffusion of preferences ( a new ideal family size or the new legitimacy of fertility control within marriage) on the other hand fits less comfortably within economic models although recent work suggests that it too can be accommodated. Cultural explanations fit rather awkwardly with economic models because culture cuts across the categories of opportunities (including information) and preferences thereby denying the validity of the dichotomous classification scheme underlying economic models. Finally culture may define the types of behaviors that are subject to individual choice in a particular society and thus delimit the areas within which economic or rational actor models are appropriate. (authors)
Journal ArticleDOI

The sacred meanings of money

TL;DR: This paper found that the interpretation of money as either sacred or profane depends on its sources and uses and that traversing the boundaries between the sacred and the profane is possible only with attention to proper context and ritual.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mobile Money: Communication, Consumption and Change in the Payments Space

TL;DR: The emerging field of mobile money is explored in this article, where mobile phone-enabled systems for value transfer and storage, primarily in the developing world, are heralded as signal intervention.
Journal ArticleDOI

Celebrity Contagion and the Value of Objects

TL;DR: The authors examine three potential explanations: mere associations, market demands, and contagion (the belief that these objects contain some remnants of their previous owners) and find that contagion appears to be the critical factor affecting the valuation of celebrity possessions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Consumer Self-Monitoring, Materialism and Involvement in Fashion Clothing:

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the relationship between gender, age, self-monitoring, materialism, fashion clothing consumption motives and fashion clothing involvement, and found that the relationships between age, gender, and age correlated positively with the consumption of fashion clothing.