Journal ArticleDOI
Two-View Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening with Synthetically Reconstructed Projection Images: Comparison with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Full-Field Digital Mammographic Images
Per Skaane,Andriy I. Bandos,Ellen B. Eben,Ingvild N. Jebsen,Mona Krager,Unni Haakenaasen,Ulrika Ekseth,Mina Izadi,Solveig Hofvind,Randi Gullien +9 more
TLDR
The combination of current reconstructed 2D images and DBT performed comparably to FFDM plus DBT and is adequate for routine clinical use when interpreting screening mammograms.Abstract:
The two-view combination of a synthesized two-dimensional view plus digital breast tomosynthesis should be considered acceptable for routine use in mammographic screening.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
TL;DR: The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the benefits and harms of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) as a primary screening method for breast cancer.
Journal ArticleDOI
Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: Breast, ovarian, and pancreatic, version 2.2021
Mary B. Daly,Tuya Pal,Michael Berry,Saundra S. Buys,Patricia I. Dickson,Susan M. Domchek,Ahmed Elkhanany,Susan Hatters Friedman,Michael Goggins,Mollie L. Hutton,Beth Y. Karlan,Seema A. Khan,Catherine Klein,Wendy Kohlmann,Allison W. Kurian,Christine Laronga,Jennifer K. Litton,Julie S. Mak,Carolyn S. Menendez,Sofia D. Merajver,Barbara S. Norquist,Kenneth Offit,Holly J. Pederson,Gwen Reiser,Leigha Senter-Jamieson,Kristen M. Shannon,Rebecca Shatsky,Kala Visvanathan,Jeffrey N. Weitzel,Myra J. Wick,Kari B. Wisinski,Matthew B. Yurgelun,Susan Darlow,Mary A. Dwyer +33 more
TL;DR: The NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic focus primarily on assessment of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants associated with increased risk of breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancer and recommended approaches to genetic testing/counseling and management strategies as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI
ACR Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening
Martha B. Mainiero,Ana Lourenço,Mary C. Mahoney,Mary S. Newell,Lisa Bailey,Lora D. Barke,Carl J. D'Orsi,Jennifer A. Harvey,Mary Katherine Hayes,Phan Tuong Huynh,Peter M. Jokich,Su-Ju Lee,Constance D. Lehman,David A. Mankoff,David A. Mankoff,Joshua A. Nepute,Samir B. Patel,Handel E. Reynolds,M. Linda Sutherland,Bruce G. Haffty +19 more
TL;DR: The ACR Appropriateness Criteria as mentioned in this paper are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel and used to recommend imaging and treatment procedures.
Journal ArticleDOI
Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening.
TL;DR: A review of current practice guidelines and additional sources of information will improve radiologists' understanding of the relevant subject of breast density and enable them to respond appropriately to questions from patients, clinicians, and the media.
Journal ArticleDOI
Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study
Daniela Bernardi,Petra Macaskill,Marco Pellegrini,Marvi Valentini,Carmine Fantò,Livio Ostillio,Paolina Tuttobene,A. Luparia,Nehmat Houssami +8 more
TL;DR: Integration of 3D mammography (2D-3D or 2D synthetic-3d) detected more cases of breast cancer than 2D Mammography alone, but increased the percentage of false-positive recalls.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Comparison of Digital Mammography Alone and Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in a Population-based Screening Program
Per Skaane,Andriy I. Bandos,Randi Gullien,Ellen B. Eben,Ulrika Ekseth,Unni Haakenaasen,Mina Izadi,Ingvild N. Jebsen,Gunnar Jahr,Mona Krager,Loren Niklason,Solveig Hofvind,David Gur +12 more
TL;DR: The use of mammography plus tomosynthesis in a screening environment resulted in a significantly higher cancer detection rate and enabled the detection of more invasive cancers.
Journal ArticleDOI
Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.
Stefano Ciatto,Nehmat Houssami,Daniela Bernardi,Francesca Caumo,Marco Pellegrini,Silvia Brunelli,Paola Tuttobene,Paola Bricolo,Carmine Fantò,Marvi Valentini,Stefania Montemezzi,Petra Macaskill +11 more
TL;DR: Integrated 2D and 3D mammography improves breast-cancer detection and has the potential to reduce false positive recalls.
Journal ArticleDOI
Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared the image quality of tomosynthesis with that of conventional mammography and estimated the recall rate of screening when Tomosynthesis is used in addition to mammography.
Journal ArticleDOI
Assessing Radiologist Performance Using Combined Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis Compared with Digital Mammography Alone: Results of a Multicenter, Multireader Trial
Elizabeth A. Rafferty,Jeong Mi Park,Liane E. Philpotts,Steven P. Poplack,Jules H. Sumkin,Elkan F. Halpern,Loren Niklason +6 more
TL;DR: Addition of tomosynthesis to digital mammography offers the dual benefit of significantly increased diagnostic accuracy and significantly reduced recall rates for noncancer cases.
Journal ArticleDOI
Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.
David Gur,Gordon S. Abrams,Denise M. Chough,Marie A. Ganott,Christiane M. Hakim,Ronald L. Perrin,Grace Y. Rathfon,Jules H. Sumkin,Margarita L. Zuley,Andriy I. Bandos +9 more
TL;DR: Use of digital breast tomosynthesis for breast imaging may result in a substantial decrease in recall rate, and there was no convincing evidence that use of digital Breast Tomosynthesis alone or in combination with FFDM results in a significant improvement in sensitivity.