scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Use of the English urgent referral pathway for suspected cancer and mortality in patients with cancer: cohort study.

TLDR
Use of the urgent referral pathway could be efficacious and general practices that consistently have a low propensity to use urgent referrals could consider increasing the use of this pathway to improve the survival of their patients with cancer.
Abstract
Objective To assess the overall effect of the English urgent referral pathway on cancer survival. Setting 8049 general practices in England. Design Cohort study. Linked information from the national Cancer Waiting Times database, NHS Exeter database, and National Cancer Register was used to estimate mortality in patients in relation to the propensity of their general practice to use the urgent referral pathway. Participants 215 284 patients with cancer, diagnosed or first treated in England in 2009 and followed up to 2013. Outcome measure Hazard ratios for death from any cause, as estimated from a Cox proportional hazards regression. Results During four years of follow-up, 91 620 deaths occurred, of which 51 606 (56%) occurred within the first year after diagnosis. Two measures of the propensity to use urgent referral, the standardised referral ratio and the detection rate, were associated with reduced mortality. The hazard ratio for the combination of high referral ratio and high detection rate was 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.94 to 0.99), applying to 16% (n=34 758) of the study population. Patients with cancer who were registered with general practices with the lowest use of urgent referral had an excess mortality (hazard ratio 1.07 (95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.08); 37% (n=79 416) of the study population). The comparator group for these two hazard ratios was the remaining 47% (n=101 110) of the study population. This result in mortality was consistent for different types of cancer (apart from breast cancer) and with other stratifications of the dataset, and was not sensitive to adjustment for potential confounders and other details of the statistical model. Conclusions Use of the urgent referral pathway could be efficacious. General practices that consistently have a low propensity to use urgent referrals could consider increasing the use of this pathway to improve the survival of their patients with cancer.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Improving early diagnosis of symptomatic cancer

TL;DR: This Review examines expedited diagnosis of cancer from four perspectives, focusing on data from the UK, where extensive awareness campaigns have been conducted, and initiatives in the primary-care setting have all occurred during a period of considerable national policy change.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evidence of advanced stage colorectal cancer with longer diagnostic intervals: a pooled analysis of seven primary care cohorts comprising 11 720 patients in five countries

TL;DR: This study provides evidence that longer diagnostic intervals are associated with more advanced CRC, and cannot define a specific ‘safe’ waiting time as the length of the primary care interval appears to have negative impact from day one.
Journal ArticleDOI

Recognizing Gynecological Cancer in Primary Care: Risk Factors, Red Flags, and Referrals.

TL;DR: Key risk factors are outlined, prevention and screening strategies are briefly discussed, and practical guidance is offered on the recognition of symptoms and signs and the investigation and referral of women with suspected cancer are offered.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Routes to diagnosis for cancer – determining the patient journey using multiple routine data sets

TL;DR: Linked cancer registration and administrative data can be used to robustly categorise the route to a cancer diagnosis for all patients to enhance understanding of and explore possible reasons for delayed diagnosis.
Journal ArticleDOI

The influence on survival of delay in the presentation and treatment of symptomatic breast cancer.

TL;DR: Multivariate analyses indicated that the adverse impact of delay in presentation on survival was attributable to an association between longer delays and more advanced stage, however, within individual stages, longer delay had no adverse impact on survival.
Journal ArticleDOI

Tumor progression in waiting time for radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

TL;DR: A negative impact of waiting time in patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck is shown, with the majority of the patients developed significant signs of tumor progression within an average time of 4 weeks.
Journal ArticleDOI

Delay in diagnosis: the experience in Denmark.

TL;DR: In future, fast-track diagnosis and treatment will be provided for suspected cancers and access to general diagnostic investigations will be improved.
Related Papers (5)