scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

What is job satisfaction

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Using Rand's theory of emotions as a starting point, the concepts of satisfaction, dissatisfaction, value, emotion, and appraisal, and their interrelationships are discussed, and the present theory of job satisfaction is contrasted with previous theories.
About
This article is published in Organizational Behavior and Human Performance.The article was published on 1969-11-01. It has received 1956 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Job satisfaction & Job design.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions

TL;DR: In this paper, a model is proposed which expresses consumer satisfaction as a function of expectation and expectancy disconfirmation, in turn, is believed to influence attitude change and purchase i...
Journal ArticleDOI

Consequences of individuals' fit at work: a meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit

TL;DR: In this article, a meta-analysis investigated the relationships between person-job (PJ), person-organization (PO), person group, and person-supervisor fit with pre-entry (applicant attraction, job acceptance, intent to hire, job offer) and postentry individual-level criteria (attitudes, performance, withdrawal behaviors, strain, tenure).
Journal ArticleDOI

The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs

TL;DR: The authors compared the predictive validity of single-item and multiple-item measures of attitude toward the ad (AAd) and attitude towards the brand (ABrand), which are two of the most widely measured constructs in marketing.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Relationship of success and expectation to affect on goal-seeking tasks.

TL;DR: Locke et al. as mentioned in this paper examined the relationship between deviation of outcome from expectation and affect using goal-seeking tasks on which S was responsible for the outcome, and found that positive deviations (where S did better than expected) were valued more than negative deviations where S did worse than expected.
Related Papers (5)