抗原变异可使得多种致病微生物易于逃避宿主免疫应答。表达在感染红细胞表面的恶性疟原虫红细胞表面蛋白1（PfPMP1）与感染红细胞、内皮细胞、树突状细胞以及胎盘的单个或多个受体作用，在黏附及免疫逃避中起关键的作用。每个单倍体基因组var基因家族编码约60种成员，通过启动转录不同的var基因变异体为抗原变异提供了分子基础。

疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]／Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

Autophagy in the Pathogenesis of Disease

Autophagy, or cellular self-digestion, is a cellular pathway involved in protein and organelle degradation, with an astonishing number of connections to human disease and physiology. For example, autophagic dysfunction is associated with cancer, neurodegeneration, microbial infection and ageing. Paradoxically, although autophagy is primarily a protective process for the cell, it can also play a role in cell death. Understanding autophagy may ultimately allow scientists and clinicians to harness this process for the purpose of improving human health.

/pdf/autophagy-fights-disease-through-cellular-self-digestion-5i6zc9bv8a.pdf

Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion

In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes.

For example, a key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process versus those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process including the amount and rate of cargo sequestered and degraded). In particular, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation must be differentiated from stimuli that increase autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. It is worth emphasizing here that lysosomal digestion is a stage of autophagy and evaluating its competence is a crucial part of the evaluation of autophagic flux, or complete autophagy.

Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation, it is imperative to target by gene knockout or RNA interference more than one autophagy-related protein. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways implying that not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.

/pdf/guidelines-for-the-use-and-interpretation-of-assays-for-ijf2t30pbq.pdf

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.

/pdf/guidelines-for-the-use-and-interpretation-of-assays-for-28d1pi1jvo.pdf

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

One goal of chemical biology is to document and understand the macromolecular interactions that take place in the cell. In this review, we discuss the classic yeast two-hybrid method (and its derivatives) and how this method continues to provide insight into the number of protein–protein partnerships in a cell. In turn, these platforms have been adapted to explore a variety of interactions, such as those between proteins and small molecules. These systems collectively are called three-hybrid assays, and they provide new opportunities for the discovery of potential binding pairs. However, two- and three-hybrid assays also have significant disadvantages, such as incomplete coverage and high rates of false positives. With these issues in mind, we discuss emerging ways of minimizing the impact of these limitations using microarrays and mass spectrometry. Finally, chemical probes related to the three-hybrid concept are going beyond observation and providing active, rational control over individual protein–protein contacts. In these systems, bifunctional compounds are used to homo- or heterodimerize target proteins reversibly, thus altering their colocalization. By purposefully controlling protein–protein contacts, these chemical dimerization methods have progressed beyond observation and towards synthetic manipulation of protein function.

Two‐ and Three‐Hybrid Systems

Nachweis von Liganden unter Verwendung von lichtbrechenden Oberflächen-Verfahren

The condition of having a healthy, functional proteome is known as protein homeostasis, or proteostasis. Establishing and maintaining proteostasis is the province of the proteostasis network, approximately 2,700 components that regulate protein synthesis, folding, localization, and degradation. The proteostasis network is a fundamental entity in biology that is essential for cellular health and has direct relevance to many diseases of protein conformation. However, it is not well defined or annotated, which hinders its functional characterization in health and disease. In this series of manuscripts, we aim to operationally define the human proteostasis network by providing a comprehensive, annotated list of its components. We provided in a previous manuscript a list of chaperones and folding enzymes as well as the components that make up the machineries for protein synthesis, protein trafficking into and out of organelles, and organelle-specific degradation pathways. Here, we provide a curated list of 838 unique high-confidence components of the autophagy-lysosome pathway, one of the two major protein degradation systems in human cells.

/pdf/a-comprehensive-enumeration-of-the-human-proteostasis-i19rr6t0.pdf

A Comprehensive Enumeration of the Human Proteostasis Network. 2. Components of the Autophagy-Lysosome Pathway

Molecular recognition of pathological tau fibril conformations


 We previously demonstrated that upregulation of A20 in TNBC subtype in response to TNFα protects these cells from cytotoxic cell death by upregulating HSP70 protein and maintaining EMT/CSC phenotype. In contrast, luminal MCF7 or ZR75-1 cells display approximately 70% apoptosis when treated with TNFα. Overexpression of A20 in luminal cells not only protected them from TNFα-induced cytotoxicity by upregulating HSP70 and EMT/CSC phenotype, but also exhibited aggressive metastatic properties in mouse xenograft models.
 We determined that TNFα-induced HSP70 upregulation in TNBC cell lines was dependent on A20 de-ubiquitinase activity that protected its degradation. Interestingly, our preliminary findings also suggested that A20 protein upregulation may be dependent on HSP70 chaperone activity. We show significant overexpression of HSP70 and A20 proteins in 4T1 cell line when treated with TNFα or chemotherapeutic agents. However, A20 expression is significantly reduced when we block HSP70 activity in cells treated with TNFα or chemotherapeutic agents (Docetaxel-DTX or Doxorubicin-DOX). We proposed that A20 transcriptional upregulation upon TNFα stimulation leads to suppression of E3-ligase and accumulation of HSP70 which then stabilizes A20 with chaperone activity. Based on our reasoning, we performed the LIMBO chaperone binding assay which predicted A20 being the potential HSP70 client protein.
 Furthermore, we show that A20/HSP70 pathway attracts tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) while inducing the accumulation of immunosuppressive MDSCs in syngeneic mouse models. Interestingly, pulmonary DTCs as well as the immune infiltrates from 4T1 tumor-bearing mice exhibited significantly higher HSP70 expression. Therefore, targeting HSP70 will have a dual activity on tumors and MDSCs and thus it may potentiate the efficacy of immunotherapy in preclinical models of breast cancer. As previously reported, murine 4T1 tumors fail to respond to check point inhibitors. We reasoned that this may be an appropriate model to test the efficacy of HSP70 inhibitor, JG-231. Expectedly, there was no difference in tumor growth and metastasis between control and anti-PDL1 treated animals, however, combination of anti-PDL1 antibody with JG-231 and chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide-CTX) significantly reduced primary tumor growth (>10 fold) and eliminated metastasis. Collectively, our pilot experiments provide a strong rationale for testing our hypothesis and may lead to a rapid translation into the clinical utility.
 Citation Format: Fulya Koksalar Alkan, Justin Wilson, Elayne Benson, Tulshi Patel, Virginia McEvoy, Nate Francois, Emma Nguyen, Hilmi Kaan Alkan, Ahmed Chadli, Jason Gestwicki, Hasan Korkaya. Heat shock proteins in immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 4606.

Jason E. Gestwicki

Papers

Two‐ and Three‐Hybrid Systems

Nachweis von Liganden unter Verwendung von lichtbrechenden Oberflächen-Verfahren

A Comprehensive Enumeration of the Human Proteostasis Network. 2. Components of the Autophagy-Lysosome Pathway

Molecular recognition of pathological tau fibril conformations

Abstract 4606: Heat shock proteins in immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment