scispace - formally typeset
J

John deCaestecker

Researcher at University of Leicester

Publications -  18
Citations -  946

John deCaestecker is an academic researcher from University of Leicester. The author has contributed to research in topics: Barrett's esophagus & Dysplasia. The author has an hindex of 9, co-authored 18 publications receiving 868 citations. Previous affiliations of John deCaestecker include University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust & Leicester General Hospital.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Consensus Statements for Management of Barrett's Dysplasia and Early-Stage Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Based on a Delphi Process

Cathy Bennett, +92 more
- 01 Aug 2012 - 
TL;DR: An international, multidisciplinary, systematic, evidence-based review of different management strategies for patients with Barrett's esophagus and dysplasia or early-stage EA and developed a data-sifting platform and used the Delphi process to create evidence- based consensus statements.
Journal ArticleDOI

BOB CAT: A Large-Scale Review and Delphi Consensus for Management of Barrett’s Esophagus With No Dysplasia, Indefinite for, or Low-Grade Dysplasia

Cathy Bennett, +51 more
TL;DR: An international, multidisciplinary, systematic search and evidence-based review of Barrett’s esophagus and provided consensus recommendations for clinical use in patients with nondysplastic, indefinite, and low-grade dysplasia (LGD).
Journal ArticleDOI

Polymorphisms Near TBX5 and GDF7 Are Associated With Increased Risk for Barrett's Esophagus

Claire Palles, +99 more
- 01 Feb 2015 - 
TL;DR: 2 loci associated with risk of Barrett's esophagus encode transcription factors involved in thoracic, diaphragmatic, and esophageal development or proteins involved in the inflammatory response.
Journal ArticleDOI

Management of Barrett's esophagus in the UK: overtreated and underbiopsied but improved by the introduction of a national randomized trial.

TL;DR: The improvement in practice in centers taking part in the AspECT trial indicates an additional value of large international RCTs, and wide variation in practice and poor compliance with guidelines are indicated.