N
Natalie S Blencowe
Researcher at University of Bristol
Publications - 136
Citations - 11804
Natalie S Blencowe is an academic researcher from University of Bristol. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Randomized controlled trial. The author has an hindex of 24, co-authored 107 publications receiving 4795 citations. Previous affiliations of Natalie S Blencowe include National Institute for Health Research & University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
Jonathan A C Sterne,Jelena Savović,Jelena Savović,Matthew J. Page,Roy G Elbers,Natalie S Blencowe,Isabelle Boutron,Isabelle Boutron,Isabelle Boutron,Christopher J Cates,Hung-Yuan Cheng,Mark Corbett,Sandra Eldridge,Jonathan Emberson,Miguel A. Hernán,Sally Hopewell,Asbjørn Hróbjartsson,Asbjørn Hróbjartsson,Daniela R Junqueira,Peter Jüni,Jamie J Kirkham,Toby J Lasserson,Tianjing Li,Alexandra McAleenan,Barnaby C Reeves,Sasha Shepperd,Ian Shrier,Lesley A. Stewart,Kate Tilling,Ian R. White,Penny Whiting,Penny Whiting,Julian P T Higgins,Julian P T Higgins +33 more
TL;DR: The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool has been updated to respond to developments in understanding how bias arises in randomised trials, and to address user feedback on and limitations of the original tool.
Journal ArticleDOI
No Surgical Innovation Without Evaluation: Evolution and Further Development of the IDEAL Framework and Recommendations
Allison Hirst,Yiannis Philippou,Jane M Blazeby,Bruce Campbell,Marion K Campbell,Joshua Feinberg,Maroeska M. Rovers,Natalie S Blencowe,Christopher Pennell,Tom Quinn,Wendy A Rogers,Jonathan Cook,Angelos G. Kolias,Riaz Agha,Philipp Dahm,Art Sedrakyan,Peter McCulloch +16 more
TL;DR: This article updates and extends the IDEAL Recommendations, identifies areas for future research, and discusses the ethical problems faced by investigators at each IDEAL stage, to widen the practical use of IDEAL.
Journal ArticleDOI
Reporting of Short-Term Clinical Outcomes After Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review
Natalie S Blencowe,Sean Strong,Angus G K McNair,Sara T Brookes,Tom Crosby,S. Michael Griffin,Jane M Blazeby +6 more
TL;DR: Outcome reporting after esophageal cancer surgery is heterogeneous and inconsistent, and it lacks methodological rigor, so at the minimum it is recommended that a “core outcome set” is defined and used in all studies reporting outcomes of esophagectomy for cancer.
Journal ArticleDOI
Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies.
Kerry N L Avery,Paula R Williamson,Carrol Gamble,Elaine O'Connell Francischetto,Chris Metcalfe,Peter Davidson,Hywel C Williams,Jane M Blazeby,Natalie S Blencowe,Carol Bugge,Michael J. Campbell,Michelle Collinson,Cindy Cooper,Janet Darbyshire,Munya Dimairo,Caroline J Doré,Sandra Eldridge,Amanda Farrin,Nadine E. Foster,Simon Gilbody,Steve Goodacre,Lisa V. Hampson,Angelos G. Kolias,Sallie Lamb,Athene Lane,Lisa Maguire,John Norrie,Ruth M. Pickering,Gillian W Shorter,Shaun Treweek +29 more
TL;DR: Systematic and transparent reporting of the design, results and evaluation of internal pilot trials in the literature should be encouraged in order to facilitate understanding in the research community and to inform future trials.
Reference EntryDOI
Dressings for the prevention of surgical site infection.
Jo C Dumville,Trish A Gray,Catherine J. Walter,Catherine A Sharp,Tamara Page,Rhiannon C Macefield,Natalie S Blencowe,Tom Milne,Barnaby C Reeves,Jane M Blazeby +9 more
TL;DR: No evidence was identified to suggest that any dressing significantly reduced the risk of developing an SSI compared with leaving wounds exposed or compared with alternative dressings in people who had surgical wounds healing by secondary intention and decisions on wound dressing should be based on dressing costs and the symptom management properties offered by each dressing type.