scispace - formally typeset
S

Samir Jaber

Researcher at University of Montpellier

Publications -  566
Citations -  35571

Samir Jaber is an academic researcher from University of Montpellier. The author has contributed to research in topics: Intensive care & Mechanical ventilation. The author has an hindex of 88, co-authored 516 publications receiving 27839 citations. Previous affiliations of Samir Jaber include French Institute of Health and Medical Research.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The influence of the airway driving pressure on pulsed pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness

TL;DR: In patients mechanically ventilated with low VT, PPV values <13% do not rule out fluid responsiveness, especially when (Pplat − PEEP) is ≤20 cmH2O, and using a polytomic logistic regression was the sole independent factor associated with a PPV value<13% in responders.
Journal ArticleDOI

Recovery after critical illness: putting the puzzle together-a consensus of 29.

TL;DR: This review seeks to highlight how critical illness and critical care affect longer-term outcomes, to underline the contribution of ICU delirium to cognitive dysfunction several months after ICU discharge, to give new insights into ICU acquired weakness, and to emphasize the importance of value-based healthcare.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of the effects of heat and moisture exchangers and heated humidifiers on ventilation and gas exchange during non-invasive ventilation

TL;DR: During NIV the increased dead space of a HME can negatively affect ventilatory function and gas exchange and the effect of HME dead space may decrease efficiency of NIV in patients with ARF.
Journal ArticleDOI

Expert consensus statements for the management of COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure using a Delphi method.

Prashant Nasa, +53 more
- 16 Mar 2021 - 
TL;DR: Using a Delphi process, an international panel of experts developed clinical practice statements on the respiratory management of COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure (C-ARF) in areas where evidence is absent or limited as discussed by the authors.