scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center

NonprofitTexcoco, Mexico
About: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center is a nonprofit organization based out in Texcoco, Mexico. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Agriculture. The organization has 1976 authors who have published 4799 publications receiving 218390 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, marker effects estimated in 255 diverse maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids were used to predict grain yield, anthesis date, and anthesis-silking interval within the diversity panel and testcross progenies of 30 F2-derived lines from each of five populations.
Abstract: Genomic prediction is expected to considerably increase genetic gains by increasing selection intensity and accelerating the breeding cycle. In this study, marker effects estimated in 255 diverse maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids were used to predict grain yield, anthesis date, and anthesis-silking interval within the diversity panel and testcross progenies of 30 F2-derived lines from each of five populations. Although up to 25% of the genetic variance could be explained by cross validation within the diversity panel, the prediction of testcross performance of F2-derived lines using marker effects estimated in the diversity panel was on average zero. Hybrids in the diversity panel could be grouped into eight breeding populations differing in mean performance. When performance was predicted separately for each breeding population on the basis of marker effects estimated in the other populations, predictive ability was low (i.e., 0.12 for grain yield). These results suggest that prediction resulted mostly from differences in mean performance of the breeding populations and less from the relationship between the training and validation sets or linkage disequilibrium with causal variants underlying the predicted traits. Potential uses for genomic prediction in maize hybrid breeding are discussed emphasizing the need of (1) a clear definition of the breeding scenario in which genomic prediction should be applied (i.e., prediction among or within populations), (2) a detailed analysis of the population structure before performing cross validation, and (3) larger training sets with strong genetic relationship to the validation set.

241 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Most SNPs used in this GoldenGate assay appear to be equally useful for diversity analysis, marker-trait association studies, and marker-aided breeding.
Abstract: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are abundant and evenly distributed throughout the genomes of most plant species. They have become an ideal marker system for genetic research in many crops. Several high throughput platforms have been developed that allow rapid and simultaneous geno- typing of up to a million SNP markers. In this study, a custom GoldenGate assay containing 1,536 SNPs was developed based on public SNP information for maize and used to genotype two recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations (Zong3 x 87-1, and B73 x By804) and a panel of 154 diverse inbred lines. Over 90% of the SNPs were successfully scored in the diversity panel and the two RIL populations, with a genotyping error rate of less than 2%. A total of 975 SNP markers detected polymorphism in at least one of the two mapping populations, with a polymorphic rate of 38.5% in Zong3 x 87-1 and 52.6% in B73 x By804. The polymorphic SNPs in B73 x By804 have been integrated with previously mapped simple sequence repeat markers to construct a high-density linkage map containing 662 markers with a total length of 1,673.7 cM and an average of 2.53 cM between two markers. The minor allelic frequency (MAF) was distributed evenly across 10 continued classes from 0.05 to 0.5, and about 16% of the SNP markers had a MAF below 10% in the diversity panel. Polymorphism rates for individual SNP mark- ers in pair-wise comparisons of genotypes tested ranged from 0.3 to 63.8% with an average of 36.3%. Most SNPs used in this GoldenGate assay appear to be equally useful for diversity analysis, marker-trait association studies, and marker-aided breeding.

241 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: SSR markers provide a powerful tool for grouping of germplasm and are a valuable complementation to field trials for identifying groups with satisfactory heterotic response.
Abstract: Heterotic groups and patterns are of fundamental importance in hybrid breeding of maize (Zea mays L.). The major goal of this study was to investigate the relationship between heterosis and genetic distance determined with simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. The objectives of our research were to (i) compare the genetic diversity within and between seven tropical maize populations, (ii) test alternative hypotheses on the relationship between panmictic midparent heterosis (PMPH) and genetic distances determined with SSR markers, and (iii) evaluate the use of SSR markers for grouping of germplasm and establishing heterotic patterns in hybrid breeding of tropical maize. Published data of a diallel of seven tropical maize populations evaluated for agronomic traits in seven environments were reanalyzed to calculate PMPH in population hybrids. In addition, 48 individuals from each population were sampled and assayed with 85 SSR markers covering the entire maize genome. A total of 532 alleles in the 7 × 48 genotypes assayed were detected. The analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed that 89.8% of the variation was found within populations and only 10.2% between populations. The correlation between PMPH and the squared modified Roger's distance (MRD) based on SSR markers was significantly positive (P < 0.05) only for grain yield (r = 0.63). With SSR analyses, it was possible to assign Population 29 (Pop29) to the established Heterotic Group A and propose new heterotic groups (Pop25, Pop43). We conclude that SSR markers provide a powerful tool for grouping of germplasm and are a valuable complementation to field trials for identifying groups with satisfactory heterotic response.

240 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Tolerance to combined drought and heat stress in maize was genetically dis- tinct from tolerance to individual stresses, and tolerance to either stress alone did not confer tolerance to Combined drought andHeat stress, which has major implications for maize drought breeding.
Abstract: Low maize (Zea mays L.) yields and the impacts of climate change on maize production highlight the need to improve yields in eastern and south - ern Africa. Climate projections suggest higher temperatures within drought-prone areas. research in model species suggests that tol - erance to combined drought and heat stress is genetically distinct from tolerance to either stress alone, but this has not been confirmed in maize. In this study we evaluated 300 maize inbred lines testcrossed to CML539. Experiments were conducted under optimal conditions, reproduc - tive stage drought stress, heat stress, and com - bined drought and heat stress. Lines with high levels of tolerance to drought and combined drought and heat stress were identified. Signifi - cant genotype × trial interaction and very large plot residuals were observed; consequently, the repeatability of individual managed stress trials was low. Tolerance to combined drought and heat stress in maize was genetically dis - tinct from tolerance to individual stresses, and tolerance to either stress alone did not confer tolerance to combined drought and heat stress. This finding has major implications for maize drought breeding. Many current drought donors and key inbreds used in widely grown African hybrids were susceptible to drought stress at elevated temperatures. Several donors toler - ant to drought and combined drought and heat stress, notably La p osta Sequia C7-F64-2-6-2-2 and DTpYC9-F46-1-2-1-2, need to be incorpo - rated into maize breeding pipelines.

240 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a double-hurdle model for the adoption of improved, high yielding maize (IHYM) varieties for each group of households was used to identify the factors influencing the adoption and use intensity of IHYM varieties.

240 citations


Authors

Showing all 2012 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Rajeev K. Varshney10270939796
Scott Chapman8436223263
Matthew P. Reynolds8328624605
Ravi P. Singh8343323790
Albrecht E. Melchinger8339823140
Pamela A. Matson8218848741
José Crossa8151923652
Graeme Hammer7731520603
José Luis Araus6222614128
Keith Goulding6126217484
John W. Snape6121413695
Bruce R. Hamaker6133313629
Zhonghu He5924510509
Rosamond L. Naylor5915530677
Wei Xiong5836410835
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
21.3K papers, 748.1K citations

88% related

University of Hohenheim
16.4K papers, 567.3K citations

88% related

Agricultural Research Service
58.6K papers, 2.1M citations

87% related

Wageningen University and Research Centre
54.8K papers, 2.6M citations

86% related

Institut national de la recherche agronomique
68.3K papers, 3.2M citations

85% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20239
202261
2021459
2020410
2019387
2018306