Myriad Genetics

About: Myriad Genetics is a company organization based out in Munich, Germany. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Cancer & Breast cancer. The organization has 562 authors who have published 586 publications receiving 56046 citations. The organization is also known as: Myriad Genetics, Inc..

Comparing sensitivity to change using the 6-item versus the 17-item Hamilton depression rating scale in the GUIDED randomized controlled trial

Abstract: Previous research suggests that the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17) is less sensitive in detecting differences between active treatment and placebo for major depressive disorder (MDD) than is the HAM-D6 scale, which focuses on six core depression symptoms. Whether HAM-D6 shows greater sensitivity when comparing two active MDD treatment arms is unknown. This post hoc analysis used data from the intent-to-treat (ITT) cohort (N = 1541) of the Genomics Used to Improve DEpression Decisions (GUIDED) trial, a rater- and patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. GUIDED compared combinatorial pharmacogenomics-guided care with treatment as usual (TAU) in patients with MDD. Percent of symptom improvement, response rate and remission rate from baseline to week 8 were evaluated using both scales. Analyses were performed for the full cohort and for the subset of patients who at baseline were taking medications predicted by the test to have moderate or significant gene-drug interactions. A Mokken scale analysis was conducted to compare the homogeneity of HAM-D17 with that of HAM-D6. At week 8, the guided-care arm demonstrated statistically significant benefit over TAU when the HAM-D6 (∆ = 4.4%, p = 0.023) was used as the continuous measure of symptom improvement, but not when using the HAM-D17 (∆ = 3.2%, p = 0.069). Response rates increased significantly for guided-care compared with TAU when evaluated using both HAM-D6 (∆ = 7.0%, p = 0.004) and HAM-D17 (∆ = 6.3%, p = 0.007). Remission rates also were significantly greater for guided-care versus TAU using both measures (HAM-D6 ∆ = 4.6%, p = 0.031; HAM-D17 ∆ = 5.5%, p = 0.005). Patients in the guided-care arm who at baseline were taking medications predicted to have gene-drug interactions showed further increased benefit over TAU at week 8 for symptom improvement (∆ = 7.3%, p = 0.004) response (∆ = 10.0%, p = 0.001) and remission (∆ = 7.9%, p = 0.005) using HAM-D6. All outcomes showed continued improvement through week 24. Mokken scale analysis demonstrated the homogeneity and unidimensionality of HAM-D6, but not of HAM-D17, across treatment arms. The HAM-D6 scale identified a statistically significant difference in symptom improvement between combinatorial pharmacogenomics-guided care and TAU, whereas the HAM-D17 did not. The demonstrated utility of pharmacogenomics-guided treatment over TAU as detected by the HAM-D6 highlights its value for future biomarker-guided trials comparing active treatment arms. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02109939. Registered 10 April 2014.

Methods and materials for assessing homologous recombination deficiency

Abstract: This document provides methods and materials involved in assessing samples (e.g., cancer cells) for the presence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) or an HRD signature. For example, methods and materials for determining whether or not a cell (e.g., a cancer cell) contains an HRD signature are provided. Materials and methods for identifying cells (e.g., cancer cells) having a deficiency in homology directed repair (HDR) as well as materials and methods for identifying cancer patients likely to respond to a particular cancer treatment regimen also are provided.

Method of treating brain cancer

Abstract: Disclosed are 4-arylamino-quinazolines and analogs thereof effective as activators of caspases and inducers of apoptosis. The compounds of this invention are useful in the treatment of a variety of clinical conditions in which uncontrolled growth and spread of abnormal cells occurs, and in particular to the use of these compounds in treating brain cancer.

Abstract S6-01:BRCA1methylation status, silencing and treatment effect in the TNT trial: A randomized phase III trial of carboplatin compared with docetaxel for patients with metastatic or recurrent locally advanced triple negative or BRCA1/2 breast cancer (CRUK/07/012)

Abstract: Background TNT previously reported that patients(pts) with advanced triple negative breast cancer(TNBC) and germline BRCA1/2(gBRCA+) mutations are more likely to respond to carboplatin(C) than to docetaxel(D), and have longer progression-free survival with C. Here, we report results from a pre-planned biological analysis to test whether BRCA silencing or methylation status confer sensitivity to platinum. Methods Pts eligible for TNT had ER-, PgR-, HER2- BC or were known gBRCA+(any ER/PgR/HER2). Pts were randomized to C(AUC 6 q3wk) or D(100mg/m2 q3wk) for 6-8 cycles or until disease progression if sooner, with crossover possible on progression. Blood and archival tissue samples were requested for BRCA1/2 genotyping, central analysis of TN and DNA repair deficiency biomarkers. Primary endpoint was intention-to-treat objective response rate(ORR) up to cycle 6. BRCA1 mRNA level was estimated from whole-genome total RNA sequencing(RNA-Seq). BRCA1 methylation analysis was quantified by bisulfite sequencing. A methylation score for the sample was computed as percentage of methylated reads relative to total number of reads that were either methylated or not methylated for CpG sites. A sample with a score >10% was considered methylated(BRCA1meth)? a BRCA1 mRNA level "silenced" subgroup(BRCA1 silencing) was defined as value of log2(mRNA) Results 212 and 191 pts9 samples were assessed for BRCA1 methylation and mRNA levels. 33 pts (15.6%) were found to be BRCA1meth. Pts with BRCA1meth had a better response to D (42%, 95%CI: 20, 64) than C (21%, 95%CI: -0.1, 43)? absolute difference (C-D) -21% (95%CI: -52, 10)? p=0.28), but not statistically significant. There was no evidence of a difference when gBRCA+ tumours were excluded. 31 pts (16%) had BRCA1 silencing. Concordant with BRCA1meth, pts with BRCA1 silencing had a better response to D (65%, 95%CI: 42, 87) than C (29%, 95%CI: 4.9, 52)? absolute difference (C-D) -36% (95%CI: -69, -3.3)? p=0.07), with an odds ratio 0.22 (95%CI: 0.035, 1.2) in favor of D, interaction with treatment not significant (p=0.066). 19 pts with BRCA1meth and BRCA1 silencing had a better response to D (60%, 95%CI: 30, 90) than C (22%, 95%CI: -5.0, 49)? absolute difference (C-D) -38% (95%CI: -79, 2.9) in favor of D (p=0.17), and the interaction was not significant (p=0.15). Further exploratory analyses examining any relationship between a response to C and new cutpoints for BRCA1meth or BRCA1 mRNA level did not suggest any evidence of a signal. Conclusion Our data did not support a priori hypotheses that BRCA1 methylation or silencing would be associated with a greater response to C than D, which is consistent with other reports in ovarian cancer. As BRCA1 methylation will not always lead to significant silencing or be the only cause of low BRCA1 gene expression, exploratory analysis is investigating the interaction of BRCA silenced group with D sensitivity. RNA-seq is ongoing and results from the final database will be presented. Citation Format: Tutt A, Cheang MCU, Kilburn L, Tovey H, Gillett C, Pinder S, Lanchbury J, Abraham J, Barrett S, Barrett-Lee P, Chan S, Gazinska P, Grigoriadis A, Kernaghan S, Hoadley K, Gutin A, Harper-Wynne C, Hatton M, Owen J, Parker P, Roylance R, Shaw A, Smith I, Thompson R, Timms K, Wardley A, Wilson G, Harries M, Ellis P, Ashworth A, Perou C, Bliss J, Rahman N, Brown R, On Behalf of the TNT Trial Management Group and Investigators. BRCA1 methylation status, silencing and treatment effect in the TNT trial: A randomized phase III trial of carboplatin compared with docetaxel for patients with metastatic or recurrent locally advanced triple negative or BRCA1/2 breast cancer (CRUK/07/012) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr S6-01.

Adjustment of the multi-biomarker disease activity score to account for age, sex and adiposity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Abstract: Objective To develop and evaluate an adjusted score for the multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) test to account for the effects of age, sex and adiposity in patients with RA. Methods Two models were developed to adjust MBDA score for age, sex and adiposity, using either serum leptin concentration or BMI as proxies for adiposity. Two cohorts were studied. A cohort of 325 781 RA patients who had undergone commercial MBDA testing and had data for age, sex and serum leptin concentration was used for both models. A cohort of 1411 patients from five studies/registries with BMI data was used only for the BMI-adjusted MBDA score. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses evaluated the adjusted MBDA scores and conventional clinical measures as predictors of radiographic progression, assessed in terms of modified total Sharp score (ΔmTSS). Results Two models were developed, based on findings that MBDA score was higher in females than males and increased with age, leptin concentration and BMI. In pairwise regression analyses, the leptin-adjusted (P = 0.00066) and BMI-adjusted (P = 0.0027) MBDA scores were significant independent predictors of ΔmTSS after adjusting for DAS28-CRP, whereas DAS28-CRP was not, after adjusting for leptin-adjusted (P = 0.74) or BMI-adjusted (P = 0.87) MBDA score. Moreover, the leptin-adjusted MBDA score was a significant predictor of ΔmTSS after adjusting for the BMI-adjusted MBDA score (P = 0.025) or the original MBDA score (0.027), whereas the opposite was not true. Conclusion Leptin-adjusted MBDA score significantly adds information to DAS28-CRP and the original MBDA score in predicting radiographic progression. It may offer improved clinical utility for personalized management of RA.