Institution
Oncology Nursing Society
Nonprofit•Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States•
About: Oncology Nursing Society is a nonprofit organization based out in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Oncology nursing & Health care. The organization has 105 authors who have published 184 publications receiving 9983 citations.
Topics: Oncology nursing, Health care, Cancer, Evidence-based practice, MEDLINE
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
Johns Hopkins University1, University of Michigan2, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center3, Georgetown University4, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust5, Roswell Park Cancer Institute6, Oncology Nursing Society7, University of Washington8, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center9, Harvard University10, University of Oklahoma11, American Society of Clinical Oncology12, New York University13, Ohio State University14
TL;DR: Recommendations for specific organ system-based toxicity diagnosis and management are presented and, in general, permanent discontinuation of ICPis is recommended with grade 4 toxicities, with the exception of endocrinopathies that have been controlled by hormone replacement.
Abstract: PurposeTo increase awareness, outline strategies, and offer guidance on the recommended management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi) therapyMethodsA multidisciplinary, multi-organizational panel of experts in medical oncology, dermatology, gastroenterology, rheumatology, pulmonology, endocrinology, urology, neurology, hematology, emergency medicine, nursing, trialist, and advocacy was convened to develop the clinical practice guideline Guideline development involved a systematic review of the literature and an informal consensus process The systematic review focused on guidelines, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and case series published from 2000 through 2017ResultsThe systematic review identified 204 eligible publications Much of the evidence consisted of systematic reviews of observational data, consensus guidelines, case series, and case reports Due to the paucity of high-quality evidence on management
2,386 citations
••
TL;DR: The roundtable concluded that exercise training is safe during and after cancer treatments and results in improvements in physical functioning, quality of life, and cancer-related fatigue in several cancer survivor groups, sufficient for the recommendation that cancer survivors follow the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.
Abstract: to physical functioning and quality of life are sufficient for the recommendation that cancer survivors follow the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, with specific exercise programming adaptations based on disease and treatment-related adverse effects. The advice to ‘‘avoid inactivity,’’ even in cancer patients with existing disease or undergoing difficult treatments, is likely helpful.
2,202 citations
••
Roswell Park Cancer Institute1, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center2, Merck & Co.3, Johns Hopkins University4, Bristol-Myers Squibb5, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center6, Brigham and Women's Hospital7, Washington University in St. Louis8, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis9, Harvard University10, University of Chicago11, Oncology Nursing Society12
TL;DR: A multidisciplinary Toxicity Management Working Group met for a full-day workshop to develop recommendations to standardize management of immune-related adverse events, and presents their consensus recommendations on managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.
Abstract: Cancer immunotherapy has transformed the treatment of cancer. However, increasing use of immune-based therapies, including the widely used class of agents known as immune checkpoint inhibitors, has exposed a discrete group of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Many of these are driven by the same immunologic mechanisms responsible for the drugs' therapeutic effects, namely blockade of inhibitory mechanisms that suppress the immune system and protect body tissues from an unconstrained acute or chronic immune response. Skin, gut, endocrine, lung and musculoskeletal irAEs are relatively common, whereas cardiovascular, hematologic, renal, neurologic and ophthalmologic irAEs occur much less frequently. The majority of irAEs are mild to moderate in severity; however, serious and occasionally life-threatening irAEs are reported in the literature, and treatment-related deaths occur in up to 2% of patients, varying by ICI. Immunotherapy-related irAEs typically have a delayed onset and prolonged duration compared to adverse events from chemotherapy, and effective management depends on early recognition and prompt intervention with immune suppression and/or immunomodulatory strategies. There is an urgent need for multidisciplinary guidance reflecting broad-based perspectives on how to recognize, report and manage organ-specific toxicities until evidence-based data are available to inform clinical decision-making. The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) established a multidisciplinary Toxicity Management Working Group, which met for a full-day workshop to develop recommendations to standardize management of irAEs. Here we present their consensus recommendations on managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.
1,325 citations
••
TL;DR: It is imperative that health professionals explore the use of CAM with their cancer patients, educate them about potentially beneficial therapies in light of the limited available evidence of effectiveness, and work towards an integrated model of health-care provision.
1,020 citations
••
Florida International University1, American Cancer Society2, University of Miami3, Oncology Nursing Society4, George Washington University5, University of Pennsylvania6, City of Hope National Medical Center7, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill8, University of Toronto9, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center10, University of California, Los Angeles11
TL;DR: Recommendations on surveillance for breast cancer recurrence, screening for second primary cancers, assessment and management of physical and psychosocial long-term and late effects of breast cancer and its treatment, health promotion, and care coordination/practice implications are made.
Abstract: The purpose of the American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline is to provide recommendations to assist primary care and other clinicians in the care of female adult survivors of breast cancer. A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed through April 2015. A multidisciplinary expert workgroup with expertise in primary care, gynecology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, and nursing was formed and tasked with drafting the Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline. A total of 1,073 articles met inclusion criteria; and, after full text review, 237 were included as the evidence base. Patients should undergo regular surveillance for breast cancer recurrence, including evaluation with a cancer-related history and physical examination, and should be screened for new primary breast cancer. Data do not support performing routine laboratory tests or imaging tests in asymptomatic patients to evaluate for breast cancer recurrence. Primary care clinicians should counsel patients about the importance of maintaining a healthy lifestyle, monitor for post-treatment symptoms that can adversely affect quality of life, and monitor for adherence to endocrine therapy. Recommendations provided in this guideline are based on current evidence in the literature and expert consensus opinion. Most of the evidence is not sufficient to warrant a strong evidence-based recommendation. Recommendations on surveillance for breast cancer recurrence, screening for second primary cancers, assessment and management of physical and psychosocial long-term and late effects of breast cancer and its treatment, health promotion, and care coordination/practice implications are made.This guideline was developed through a collaboration between the American Cancer Society and the American Society of Clinical Oncology and has been published jointly by invitation and consent in both CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians and Journal of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission by the American Cancer Society or the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
795 citations
Authors
Showing all 108 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Christine Miaskowski | 85 | 669 | 35199 |
Aung Naing | 54 | 448 | 12340 |
Lisa M. Klesges | 45 | 126 | 7950 |
Anna L. Schwartz | 32 | 66 | 7539 |
Elisabeth Patiraki | 31 | 74 | 3331 |
Jennifer T. Loud | 29 | 75 | 4041 |
Daniel Kelly | 29 | 205 | 3078 |
Colin K. W. Watts | 29 | 45 | 2932 |
Winnie K.W. So | 27 | 157 | 2812 |
Mi Kyung Song | 26 | 96 | 2498 |
Mary E. Cooley | 23 | 78 | 1801 |
Linda H. Eaton | 17 | 38 | 752 |
Gail Mallory | 12 | 14 | 609 |
Brenda Nevidjon | 11 | 34 | 570 |
Brittany E. Harvey | 11 | 12 | 2090 |