Institution
Society for Women's Health Research
Nonprofit•Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States•
About: Society for Women's Health Research is a nonprofit organization based out in Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Sex characteristics & Disease. The organization has 43 authors who have published 59 publications receiving 3104 citations.
Topics: Sex characteristics, Disease, Health care, Mental health, MEDLINE
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: Methods and procedures are described to assist scientists new to the field in designing and conducting experiments to investigate sex differences in research involving both laboratory animals and humans.
Abstract: Female and male brains differ. Differences begin early during development due to a combination of genetic and hormonal events and continue throughout the lifespan of an individual. Although researchers from a myriad of disciplines are beginning to appreciate the importance of considering sex differences in the design and interpretation of their studies, this is an area that is full of potential pitfalls. A female's reproductive status and ovarian cycle have to be taken into account when studying sex differences in health and disease susceptibility, in the pharmacological effects of drugs, and in the study of brain and behavior. To investigate sex differences in brain and behavior there is a logical series of questions that should be answered in a comprehensive investigation of any trait. First, it is important to determine that there is a sex difference in the trait in intact males and females, taking into consideration the reproductive cycle of the female. Then, one must consider whether the sex difference is attributable to the actions of gonadal steroids at the time of testing and/or is sexually differentiated permanently by the action of gonadal steroids during development. To answer these questions requires knowledge of how to assess and/or manipulate the hormonal condition of the subjects in the experiment appropriately. This article describes methods and procedures to assist scientists new to the field in designing and conducting experiments to investigate sex differences in research involving both laboratory animals and humans.
723 citations
••
Stanford University1, University of Maryland, Baltimore2, Baylor College of Medicine3, University of Pittsburgh4, University of California, Los Angeles5, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific6, University of Chicago7, University of Texas at Austin8, Durham University9, University of Alabama10, Society for Women's Health Research11, University of Bologna12, Gannon University13, Brigham and Women's Hospital14, Mayo Clinic15, University of Washington16
TL;DR: There is consensus among experts regarding some indicators of sleep quality among otherwise healthy individuals, but overall, there was less or no consensus regarding sleep architecture or nap‐related variables as elements of good sleep quality.
688 citations
••
TL;DR: Sex and gender have not yet been adequately integrated into many of the precision medicine methodologies and approaches used in the management of Alzheimer's disease dementia.
Abstract: Introduction Precision medicine methodologies and approaches have advanced our understanding of the clinical presentation, development, progression, and management of Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia. However, sex and gender have not yet been adequately integrated into many of these approaches. Methods The Society for Women's Health Research Interdisciplinary Network on AD, comprised of an expert panel of scientists and clinicians, reviewed ongoing and published research related to sex and gender differences in AD. Results The current review is a result of this Network's efforts and aims to: (1) highlight the current state-of-the-science in the AD field on sex and gender differences; (2) address knowledge gaps in assessing sex and gender differences; and (3) discuss 12 priority areas that merit further research. Discussion The exclusion of sex and gender has impeded faster advancement in the detection, treatment, and care of AD across the clinical spectrum. Greater attention to these differences will improve outcomes for both sexes.
406 citations
••
TL;DR: To understand the role of sex differences in sleep and the state of women's sleep health research, the Society for Women's Health Research convened an interdisciplinary expert panel of well-established sleep researchers and clinicians for a roundtable meeting.
Abstract: Previous attempts have been made to address sleep disorders in women; however, significant knowledge gaps in research and a lack of awareness among the research community continue to exist. There is a great need for scientists and clinicians to consider sex and gender differences in their sleep research to account for the unique biology of women. To understand the role of sex differences in sleep and the state of women's sleep health research, the Society for Women's Health Research convened an interdisciplinary expert panel of well-established sleep researchers and clinicians for a roundtable meeting. Focused discussions on basic and clinical research along with a focus on specific challenges facing women with sleep-related problems and effective therapies led to the identification of knowledge gaps and the development of research-related recommendations. Additionally, sex differences in sleep disorders were noted and discussed in the context of underlying hormonal differences. Differences in sleep behavior and sleep disorders may not only be driven by biological factors but also by gender differences in the way women and men report symptoms. Progress has been made in identifying sex and gender differences in many areas of sleep, but major research gaps in the areas of epidemiology, sleep regulation, sleep quality, diagnosis, and treatment need to be addressed. Identifying the underlying nature of sex and gender differences in sleep research has potential to accelerate improved care for both men and women facilitating better diagnosis, treatment, and ultimately prevention of sleep disorders and related comorbid conditions.
310 citations
••
TL;DR: Women were significantly more likely than men to use one or more medications during the analysis period and be prescribed guideline-based treatment for diabetes and select cardiovascular conditions.
Abstract: Background: This study evaluates the differences between women and men in medication use, medication adherence, and prescribing alignment with clinical guidelines. Methods: We conducted an analysis of pharmacy and medical claims for 29.5 million adults with prescription benefits administered by a pharmacy benefits manager in the United States, age 18 and older, between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2010. Prevalence and intensity of medication use were evaluated by sex, age group, and medication type (acute vs. chronic). Medication adherence was measured by the percentage of patients with a medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥80%. The percentage of patients receiving guideline-based treatment was measured for diabetes and select cardiovascular conditions. Results: The study population comprised 16.0 million women and 13.5 million men with continuous pharmacy benefit eligibility. Women were significantly more likely than men to use one or more medications during the analysis period (68% vs. 59%,...
265 citations
Authors
Showing all 44 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Barbara D. Boyan | 91 | 468 | 31098 |
Roger M. Enoka | 85 | 366 | 25130 |
Kathleen A. Sluka | 81 | 282 | 19154 |
Wendy M. Kohrt | 72 | 282 | 16851 |
David A. Hart | 59 | 356 | 10744 |
Karen J. Berkley | 53 | 118 | 10932 |
C. Kent Kwoh | 52 | 168 | 7924 |
Richard D. Coutts | 40 | 62 | 5120 |
Mary I. O'Connor | 37 | 143 | 4232 |
Laura L. Tosi | 22 | 45 | 2808 |
Lorena M. Havill | 21 | 42 | 1335 |
Daniel P. Nicolella | 15 | 41 | 475 |
Laura L. Tosi | 15 | 44 | 592 |
Monica P. Mallampalli | 10 | 13 | 1352 |
Sherry A. Marts | 9 | 21 | 1030 |