Suffolk University

About: Suffolk University is a education organization based out in Boston, Massachusetts, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Sugar beet. The organization has 6462 authors who have published 9321 publications receiving 235328 citations.

Heart murmurs and valvular regurgitation in thoroughbred racehorses: epidemiology and associations with athletic performance.

Abstract: Background: Cardiac murmurs associated with valvular regurgitation occur commonly in conditioned performance horses, but their association with athletic performance is unknown. Hypothesis: Cardiac valvular regurgitation has a negative association with race performance. Animals: Five hundred and twenty-six “race fit” Thoroughbred racehorses engaged in either flat (race distance 1,000–2,500 m) or jump racing (race distance 3,200–6,400 m). Methods: Cardiac auscultation and color flow Doppler (CFD) echocardiography were performed on 777 occasions. The associations between the presence and severity of either an audible cardiac murmur or valvular regurgitation assessed by CFD, and published, objective measures of race performance were determined using a standard regression approach. Results: The prevalence of murmurs and of regurgitation varied significantly between racetypes (P<.02), generally increasing from 2-year olds to chasers. There were no consistent associations between racing performance and either grade of murmur or regurgitation, whether the presence or absence of regurgitation or murmur, or only murmurs ≥3/6 or regurgitation ≥6/9, were considered. Conclusions and Clinical Importance: There were differences in prevalence and severity of murmurs of atrioventricular and aortic valve regurgitation between racehorses in different disciplines. Data also showed that neither regurgitation nor murmurs were negatively associated with Timeform rating, an index of UK racehorse quality, in any of the groups of racehorses studied.

Are we underestimating diabetes-related lower-extremity amputation rates? Results and benefits of the first prospective study.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE —The objective of this study was to accurately determine the incidence of lower-extremity amputation using prospective data collection and to compare the results with those obtained by retrospective methods. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS —The study was carried out over a 3-year period in a large district general hospital covering a clearly defined and relatively static population. All diabetic inpatients with foot problems were identified and followed-up until discharge or death. The demographic and admission details, medical history, investigations, procedures, and history and etiology of the foot lesion were collected twice weekly by a specialist nurse and podiatrist from all relevant wards. Thus, all subjects who underwent amputation could be identified. For comparison, retrospective data were collected from the hospital coding activities database, operating theater log books, anesthetic database, and limb-fitting records. RESULTS —The total population of the region in 2000 was 337,859, of which 9,183 were known to have diabetes. The total number of amputations during the 3-year survey period was 79, of which 45 were major and 34 minor. In our local population, the mean incidence during the survey period (1997–2000) equates to 7.8/100,000 general population and 2.85/1,000 diabetic population for all amputations, 4.5/100,000 general population and 1.62/1,000 diabetic population for major amputations, and 3.3/100,000 general population and 1.23/1,000 diabetic population for minor amputations. The prospective survey detected all lower-extremity amputations identified by the various retrospective methods; however, for the reverse, this was not the case. All of the retrospective methods, including the most commonly used (ICD-9 and OPCS-4 coding), failed to detect all of the cases revealed by the prospective survey (error rate ranging from 4.2 to 90.6%), and between 4.5 and 17.4% of amputations were misclassified. CONCLUSIONS —This study demonstrates the advantages of prospective data collection as a means of determining the incidence of lower-extremity amputations and highlights the limitations of retrospective data collection methods, which underestimate the incidence. In particular, the operating theater records, which have been the gold standard for many surveys, were found to be unreliable. Moreover, we have shown a 47% reduction in the major amputations during the survey period. Thus, we recommend that a prospective audit be incorporated into the activities of the specialist foot care team as a means of assessing and improving clinical care.

Impaired cognition and decision-making in bipolar depression but no 'affective bias' evident.

Abstract: Background Depression is usually the predominant affective state in bipolar disorder. There are few studies, with discrepant views, examining the extent of cognitive impairment in patients with bipolar depression. To our knowledge, there are no previous studies examining decision-making ability or whether there is an affective attentional bias in bipolar depression. Method We ascertained 24 depressed bipolar I patients from acute psychiatric hospital wards and out-patient clinics and 26 age- and IQ-matched healthy controls. Using computerized tests we evaluated their performance on 'neutral' (non-emotional) cognitive tasks (i.e. memory, attention and executive function) and on novel tasks of emotional cognition (i.e. the decision-making task and the affective go/no-go task). Results Accuracy measures were significantly impaired on tests of visual and spatial recognition and attentional set-shifting in bipolar depression compared with age- and IQ-matched controls. The quality of decision-making was also significantly impaired in the patients. A mood-congruent attentional bias for 'sad' targets was not evident on the affective go/no-go task. Conclusions We found widespread evidence of significant cognitive impairment and impaired quality of decision-making in symptomatically severe depressed bipolar patients. This cognitive impairment may contribute to difficulties with daily living, decision-making and the ability to engage and comply with psychological and drug treatments.