scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers in "Liver cancer in 2021"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Clinical Practice Manual for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) as mentioned in this paper was published by the Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) expert panel in 2007, with emphasis on the consensus statements and recommendations for the management of HCC.
Abstract: The Clinical Practice Manual for Hepatocellular Carcinoma was published based on evidence confirmed by the Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hepatocellular Carcinoma along with consensus opinion among a Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) expert panel on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Since the JSH Clinical Practice Guidelines are based on original articles with extremely high levels of evidence, expert opinions on HCC management in clinical practice or consensus on newly developed treatments are not included. However, the practice manual incorporates the literature based on clinical data, expert opinion, and real-world clinical practice currently conducted in Japan to facilitate its use by clinicians. Alongside each revision of the JSH Guidelines, we issued an update to the manual, with the first edition of the manual published in 2007, the second edition in 2010, the third edition in 2015, and the fourth edition in 2020, which includes the 2017 edition of the JSH Guideline. This article is an excerpt from the fourth edition of the HCC Clinical Practice Manual focusing on pathology, diagnosis, and treatment of HCC. It is designed as a practical manual different from the latest version of the JSH Clinical Practice Guidelines. This practice manual was written by an expert panel from the JSH, with emphasis on the consensus statements and recommendations for the management of HCC proposed by the JSH expert panel. In this article, we included newly developed clinical practices that are relatively common among Japanese experts in this field, although all of their statements are not associated with a high level of evidence, but these practices are likely to be incorporated into guidelines in the future. To write this article, coauthors from different institutions drafted the content and then critically reviewed each other's work. The revised content was then critically reviewed by the Board of Directors and the Planning and Public Relations Committee of JSH before publication to confirm the consensus statements and recommendations. The consensus statements and recommendations presented in this report represent measures actually being conducted at the highest-level HCC treatment centers in Japan. We hope this article provides insight into the actual situation of HCC practice in Japan, thereby affecting the global practice pattern in the management of HCC.

202 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Combination of TKI/anti-PD-1 antibodies is a feasible conversion therapy for patients with unresectable HCC to become resectable, and represents the largest patient cohort on downstaging role of combinational systemic therapy on TKI and PD-1 antibody for HCC.
Abstract: Background Combined therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and anti-PD-1 antibodies has shown high tumor response rates for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, using this treatment strategy to convert initially unresectable HCC to resectable HCC was not reported. Methods Consecutive patients with unresectable HCC who received first-line therapy with combined TKI/anti-PD-1 antibodies were analyzed. Tumor response and resectability were evaluated via imaging every 2 months (±2 weeks) using RECIST v1.1. Resectability criteria were (1) R0 resection could be achieved with sufficient remnant liver volume and function; (2) intrahepatic lesions were evaluated as partial responses or stable disease for at least 2 months; (3) no severe or persistent adverse effects occurred; and (4) hepatectomy was not contraindicated. Results Sixty-three consecutive patients were enrolled. Of them, 10 (15.9%) underwent R0 resection in 3.2 months (range: 2.4-8.3 months) after the initiation of combination therapy. At baseline, these 10 patients had a median largest tumor diameter of 9.3 cm, 7 had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C (vascular invasion) disease, 2 had stage B, and 1 had stage A. Before surgery, 6 patients were evaluated as a partial response, 3 stable disease, and 1 partial response in the intrahepatic lesion but a new metastatic lesion in the right adrenal gland. Six patients (60%) achieved a pathological complete response. One patient died from immune-related adverse effects 2.4 months after hepatectomy. After a median follow-up of 11.2 months (range: 7.8-15.9 months) for other 9 patients, 8 survived without disease recurrence, and 1 experienced tumor recurrence. Conclusions Combination of TKI/anti-PD-1 antibodies is a feasible conversion therapy for patients with unresectable HCC to become resectable. This study represents the largest patient cohort on downstaging role of combinational systemic therapy on TKI and PD-1 antibody for HCC.

78 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate the meta-analytic pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each MRI feature for diagnosing MVI in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Abstract: Purpose Microvascular invasion (MVI) is an important prognostic factor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the reported results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features for predicting MVI of HCC are variable and conflicting. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to identify the significant MRI features for MVI of HCC and to determine their diagnostic value. Methods Original studies reporting the diagnostic performance of MRI for predicting MVI of HCC were identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE up until January 15, 2020. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. A bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate the meta-analytic pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each MRI feature for diagnosing MVI in HCC. The meta-analytic pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the significant MRI features. Results Among 235 screened articles, we found 36 studies including 4,274 HCCs. Of the 15 available MRI features, 7 were significantly associated with MVI: larger tumor size (>5 cm) (DOR = 5.2, 95% CI [3.0-9.0]), rim arterial enhancement (4.2, 95% CI [1.7-10.6]), arterial peritumoral enhancement (4.4, 95% CI [2.8-6.9]), peritumoral hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase imaging (HBP) (8.2, 95% CI [4.4-15.2]), nonsmooth tumor margin (3.2, 95% CI [2.2-4.4]), multifocality (7.1, 95% CI [2.6-19.5]), and hypointensity on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) (4.9, 95% CI [2.5-9.6]). Both peritumoral hypointensity on HBP and multifocality showed very high meta-analytic pooled specificities for diagnosing MVI (91.1% [85.4-94.8%] and 93.3% [74.5-98.5%], respectively). Conclusions Seven MRI features including larger tumor size, rim arterial enhancement, arterial peritumoral enhancement, peritumoral hypointensity on HBP, nonsmooth margin, multifocality, and hypointensity on T1WI were significant predictors for MVI of HCC. These MRI features predictive of MVI can be useful in the management of HCC.

55 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The IMbrave150 study as mentioned in this paper showed that atezolizumab-plus-bevacizumaab significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Chinese patients.
Abstract: Introduction Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in IMbrave150. Efficacy and safety data from the Chinese subpopulation are reported. Methods IMbrave150, a global, randomized, open-label, phase 3 study in patients with systemic treatment-naive unresectable HCC, included an extension phase that enrolled additional patients from mainland China. Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive intravenous atezolizumab 1,200 mg plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg once every 3 weeks or sorafenib 400 mg twice a day until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit. Co-primary endpoints were OS and independent review facility-assessed PFS per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 in the intention-to-treat population. Results Of 194 Chinese patients enrolled from April 16, 2018, to April 8, 2019 (137 in the global study and 57 in the China extension phase), 133 received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and 61 received sorafenib. At the data cutoff (August 29, 2019), the stratified hazard ratio for OS was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.25-0.76) and for PFS was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.40-0.90). The respective median OS and PFS with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab were not reached (NR; 95% CI, 13.5 months to NR) and 5.7 months (95% CI, 4.2-8.3) versus 11.4 months (95% CI, 6.7 to NR) and 3.2 months (95% CI, 2.6-4.8) with sorafenib. Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 78 of 132 (59.1%) atezolizumab plus bevacizumab-treated and 27 of 58 (46.6%) sorafenib-treated patients. The most common grade 3-4 AE with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was hypertension, occurring in 15.2% of patients; however, other high-grade AEs were infrequent. Conclusion Clinically meaningful improvements in OS and PFS observed with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib suggest that atezolizumab plus bevacizumab may become a practice-changing treatment for Chinese patients with unresectable HCC.

51 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Treatment with avelumab plus axitinib was associated with a manageable toxicity profile and showed antitumor activity in patients with aHCC, reports the final analysis from VEGF Liver 100.
Abstract: Introduction Combining an immune checkpoint inhibitor with a targeted antiangiogenic agent may leverage complementary mechanisms of action for the treatment of advanced/metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) Avelumab is a human anti-PD-L1 IgG1 antibody with clinical activity in various tumor types; axitinib is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3 We report the final analysis from VEGF Liver 100 (NCT03289533), a phase 1b study evaluating safety and efficacy of avelumab plus axitinib in treatment-naive patients with aHCC Methods Eligible patients had confirmed aHCC, no prior systemic therapy, ≥1 measurable lesion, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1, and Child-Pugh class A disease Patients received avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks plus axitinib 5 mg orally twice daily until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal Endpoints included safety and investigator-assessed objective response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 11 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) for HCC Results Twenty-two Japanese patients were enrolled and treated with avelumab plus axitinib The minimum follow-up was 18 months as of October 25, 2019 (data cutoff) Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 16 patients (727%); the most common (≥3 patients) were hypertension (n = 11 [500%]), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (n = 5 [227%]), and decreased appetite (n = 3 [136%]) No grade 4 TRAEs or treatment-related deaths occurred Ten patients (455%) had an immune-related AE (irAE) of any grade; 3 patients (136%) had an infusion-related reaction (IRR) of any grade, and no grade ≥3 irAE and IRR were observed The objective response rate was 136% (95% CI: 29-349%) per RECIST 11 and 318% (95% CI: 139-549%) per mRECIST for HCC Conclusion Treatment with avelumab plus axitinib was associated with a manageable toxicity profile and showed antitumor activity in patients with aHCC

48 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: CD8 T-cell exhaustion in tumor microenvironment may predict better efficacy of ICI therapy for HCC, consistent with prior observation that patients with lung metastatic HCC may have higher probability of response to ICI Therapy.
Abstract: Background Reversal of CD8 T-cell exhaustion was considered a major antitumor mechanism of anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/ anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)-based immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Objectives The aim of this study was to identify markers of T-cell exhaustion that is best associated with ICI treatment efficacy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods Immune cell composition of archival tumor samples was analyzed by transcriptomic analysis and multiplex immunofluorescence staining. Results HCC patients with objective response after anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1-based ICI therapy (n = 42) had higher expression of genes related to T-cell exhaustion. A 9-gene signature (LAG3, CD244, CCL5, CXCL9, CXCL13, MSR1, CSF3R, CYBB, and KLRK1) was defined, whose expression was higher in patients with response to ICI therapy, correlated with density of CD8+LAG3+ cells in tumor microenvironment, and independently predicted better progression-free and overall survival. This 9-gene signature had similar predictive values for patients who received single-agent or combination ICI therapy and was not associated with prognosis in HCC patients who received surgery, suggesting that it may outperform other T-cell signatures for predicting efficacy of ICI therapy for HCC. For HCC patients who underwent surgery for both the primary liver and metastatic lung tumors (n = 31), lung metastatic HCC was associated with a higher exhausted CD8 T-cell signature, consistent with prior observation that patients with lung metastatic HCC may have higher probability of response to ICI therapy. Conclusions CD8 T-cell exhaustion in tumor microenvironment may predict better efficacy of ICI therapy for HCC.

47 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Atezolizumab-bevacizumAB is the new standard of care for first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the optimal sequence of therapy after disease prognosis is still unclear.
Abstract: 272Background: Atezolizumab-bevacizumab is the new standard of care for first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the optimal sequence of therapy after disease progr...

43 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a clinical-radiomic model (CR model) was developed for preoperatively predicting treatment response to first transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with intermediate-stage HCC.
Abstract: Background: The preoperative selection of patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are likely to have an objective response to first transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains challenging. Objective: To develop and validate a clinical-radiomic model (CR model) for preoperatively predicting treatment response to first TACE in patients with intermediate-stage HCC. Methods: A total of 595 patients with intermediate-stage HCC were included in this retrospective study. A tumoral and peritumoral (10 mm) radiomic signature (TPR-signature) was constructed based on 3,404 radiomic features from 4 regions of interest. A predictive CR model based on TPR-signature and clinical factors was developed using multivariate logistic regression. Calibration curves and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were used to evaluate the model’s performance. Results: The final CR model consisted of 5 independent predictors, including TPR-signature ( p < 0.001), AFP ( p = 0.004), Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer System Stage B (BCLC B) subclassification ( p = 0.01), tumor location ( p = 0.039), and arterial hyperenhancement ( p = 0.050). The internal and external validation results demonstrated the high-performance level of this model, with internal and external AUCs of 0.94 and 0.90, respectively. In addition, the predicted objective response via the CR model was associated with improved survival in the external validation cohort (hazard ratio: 2.43; 95% confidence interval: 1.60–3.69; p < 0.001). The predicted treatment response also allowed for significant discrimination between the Kaplan-Meier curves of each BCLC B subclassification. Conclusions: The CR model had an excellent performance in predicting the first TACE response in patients with intermediate-stage HCC and could provide a robust predictive tool to assist with the selection of patients for TACE.

43 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The combined score including Wnt/β-catenin activation, CPS of PD-L1, and degree of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in HCC is informative for predicting the response to ICI in H CC cases.
Abstract: Introduction Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been considered as promising agents for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), previous clinical trials revealed that the response to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) monotherapy was as low as 20%. Identifying subgroups that respond well to ICIs is clinically important. Here, we studied the prognostic factors for anti-PD-1 antibody treatment based on the molecular and immunological features of HCC. Methods Patients who were administered anti-PD1 antibody for advanced HCC at Kindai University Hospital were included. Clinicopathological backgrounds and antitumor responses were examined in 34 cases where tumor tissues before treatment were available. Transcriptome analysis was performed using 40 HCC samples obtained from surgical resection, and immune status was compared between 20 HCCs with activating mutations in β-catenin and those without the mutations using transcriptome-based immunogram. Results Univariate analysis showed that the disease control rate was significantly better in patients with α-fetoprotein < 400 ng/mL, negative for β-catenin/glutamate synthetase (GS) staining, high combined positive score (CPS) of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and increased infiltration of CD8+ cells in tumor tissues. Among them, negative staining of β-catenin/GS, CPS of PD-L1 ≥ 1, and high degree of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were significantly associated with longer survival in both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The combination of these factors well stratified the survival of the patients on anti-PD-1 antibody in both PFS and OS (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0048 for PFS and OS, respectively). In addition, the immunogram revealed that tumor-carrying mutations in β-catenin showed downregulation of immune-related genes, especially in those related to priming and activation by dendritic cells, interferon-γ response, inhibitory molecules, and regulatory T cells. Discussion/Conclusion The combined score including Wnt/β-catenin activation, CPS of PD-L1, and degree of CD8+ TILs in HCC is informative for predicting the response to ICI in HCC cases. Constitutive activation of β-catenin can induce an immune cold phenotype with downregulation of immune-related genes, and immunohistochemistry-based evaluation is beneficial for identifying the subgroup that shows a good response to ICI.

42 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The role of DWI in predicting tumor grading/microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was discussed in this article. But DWI cannot predict tumor grading and MVI in HCC.
Abstract: Background: To date, there are inconsistent data about relationships between diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and tumor grading/microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our purpose was to systematize the reported results regarding the role of DWI in prediction of tumor grading/MVI in HCC. Method: MEDLINE library, Scopus, and Embase data bases were screened up to December 2019. Overall, 29 studies with 2,715 tumors were included into the analysis. There were 20 studies regarding DWI and tumor grading, 8 studies about DWI and MVI, and 1 study investigated DWI, tumor grading, and MVI in HCC. Results: In 21 studies (1,799 tumors), mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values (ADCmean) were used for distinguishing HCCs. ADCmean of G1–3 lesions overlapped significantly. In 4 studies (461 lesions), minimum ADC (ADCmin) was used. ADCmin values in G1/2 lesions were over 0.80 × 10−3 mm2/s and in G3 tumors below 0.80 × 10−3 mm2/s. In 4 studies (241 tumors), true diffusion ( D ) was reported. A significant overlapping of D values between G1, G2, and G3 groups was found. ADCmean and MVI were analyzed in 9 studies (1,059 HCCs). ADCmean values of MIV+/MVI− lesions overlapped significantly. ADCmin was used in 4 studies (672 lesions). ADCmin values of MVI+ tumors were in the area under 1.00 × 10−3 mm2/s. In 3 studies (227 tumors), D was used. Also, D values of MVI+ lesions were predominantly in the area under 1.00 × 10−3 mm2/s. Conclusion: ADCmin reflects tumor grading, and ADCmin and D predict MVI in HCC. Therefore, these DWI parameters should be estimated for every HCC lesion for pretreatment tumor stratification. ADCmean cannot predict tumor grading/MVI in HCC.

30 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In a real-life Western scenario (mostly in a third-line setting), cabozantinib efficacy and safety data were comparable with those reported in its registration trial.
Abstract: Introduction Cabozantinib has been approved by the European Medicine Agency (EMA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) previously treated with sorafenib. Cabozantinib is also being tested in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the frontline setting. Real-life clinical data of cabozantinib for HCC are still lacking. Moreover, the prognostic factors for HCC treated with cabozantinib have not been investigated. Methods We evaluated clinical data and outcome of HCC patients who received cabozantinib in the legal context of named patient use in Italy. Results Ninety-six patients from 15 centres received cabozantinib. All patients had preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A), mostly with an advanced HCC (77.1%) in a third-line setting (75.0%). The prevalence of performance status (PS) > 0, macrovascular invasion (MVI), extrahepatic spread, and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) >400 ng/mL was 50.0, 30.2, 67.7, and 44.8%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were 12.1 (95% confidence interval 9.4-14.8) and 5.1 (3.3-6.9) months, respectively. Most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (67.7%), diarrhoea (54.2%), anorexia (45.8%), HFSR (43.8%), weight loss (24.0%), and hypertension (24.0%). Most common treatment-related Grade 3-4 AEs were fatigue (6.3%), HFSR (6.3%), and increased aminotransferases (6.3%). MVI, ECOG-PS > 0, and AFP >400 ng/mL predicted a worse OS. Discontinuation for intolerance and no new extrahepatic lesions at the progression were associated with better outcomes. Conclusions In a real-life Western scenario (mostly in a third-line setting), cabozantinib efficacy and safety data were comparable with those reported in its registration trial. Data regarding the prognostic factors might help in patient selection and design of clinical trials.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatments for adults with locally advanced or metastatic unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and no prior systemic treatment.
Abstract: Background Most phase 3 clinical trials of systemic therapy for first-line unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have failed, with the exception of SHARP, REFLECT, and IMbrave150. We conducted indirect comparisons of therapies evaluated for first-line HCC treatment. Summary We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatments for adults with locally advanced or metastatic unresectable HCC and no prior systemic treatment, including atezolizu-mab plus bevacizumab, sorafenib, lenvatinib, nivolumab, selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT), transarterial chemoembolization, and placebo or best supportive care. Randomized controlled trials published from January 1, 2007, to March 12, 2020, were retrieved from MEDLINE and Embase. Qualitative assessment of heterogeneity evaluated study designs, populations, and outcomes. Indirect comparisons used generalized linear models with random effects within a Bayesian framework and informative priors. We calculated relative efficacy estimates with 95% credible intervals (CrIs) and Bayesian posterior probability estimates of atezolizumab-bevacizumab being superior to other treatments. Nine clinical studies with a total of 3,897 participants were identified from 8,783 records and used to build the all-trials evidence network. Indirect comparisons suggested an improved overall survival (OS) with atezolizumab-bevacizumab versus lenvatinib (odds ratio, 0.63 [95% CrI 0.39-1.04]; with 97% Bayesian posterior probability of being superior), nivolumab (0.68 [95% CrI 0.41-1.14]; 94%), sorafenib (0.59 [95% CrI 0.39-0.87]; 99%), SIRT (0.51 [95% CrI 0.32-0.82]; 100%), or placebo/best supportive care (0.40 [95% CrI 0.25-0.64]; 100%). Key messages Within the context of indirect comparisons, analyses of OS favored atezolizumab-bevacizumab versus other treatment options for patients with locally advanced or metastatic unresectable HCC.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a hospital-based retrospective study was conducted on 111 consecutive patients who had unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and were treated with lenvatinib at Samsung Medical Center from October 2018 to March 2020.
Abstract: Background: Lenvatinib has been recently approved as a first-line treatment option for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Korea. We aimed to study the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib therapy in a real-world practice and to find prognostic factors related to survival and disease progression. Methods: A hospital-based retrospective study was conducted on 111 consecutive patients who had unresectable HCC and were treated with lenvatinib at Samsung Medical Center from October 2018 to March 2020. Efficacy was determined using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria in 111 patients who completed 1st tumor assessment. Safety was evaluated in 116 HCC patients including 5 patients who discontinued lenvatinib due to adverse events (AEs) before 1st tumor assessment using Common Terminology Criteria for AEs version 5.0. Results: A total of 111 patients with a median age of 59 years were analyzed during a median follow-up duration of 6.2 (4.4–9.0) months. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival was 10.5 months, and the median progression-free survival was 6.2 months. Based on mRECIST criteria, the objective response rate was 18.9% and disease control rate was 75.7%. AEs developed in 86/116 (74.1%) patients, and grade ≥3 AEs developed in 16/116 (13.8%) patients. Diarrhea, hand-foot skin rash, abdominal pain, hypertension, and anorexia were identified as the AEs with the highest frequencies of any grade. REFLECT eligibility criteria including tumor extent ≥50% liver occupation or inadequate bone marrow function and occurrence of anorexia were prognostic factors for survival, and occurrence of diarrhea was a favorable factor for disease progression. Conclusion: Lenvatinib therapy showed a favorable efficacy and safety in a real-world practice. The REFLECT eligibility criteria and specific AEs could be one of the prognostic markers.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors investigated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus best supportive care (BSC) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with sorafenib.
Abstract: Introduction KEYNOTE-240 investigated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus best supportive care (BSC) in sorafenib-treated patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Results for the subgroup of patients from Asia are described. Methods Adults with advanced HCC previously treated with sorafenib were randomized 2:1 to pembrolizumab or placebo plus BSC. Here, the Asian subgroup comprised patients enrolled in Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, the Philippines, Taiwan, and Thailand. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) per blinded central imaging review and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) per blinded central imaging review, duration of response (DOR), and safety. Results The Asian subgroup included 157 patients. As of January 2, 2019, the median follow-up in this subgroup was 13.8 months for pembrolizumab and 8.3 months for placebo. The median PFS was 2.8 months for pembrolizumab (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-4.1) versus 1.4 months (95% CI 1.4-2.4) for placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.48; 95% CI 0.32-0.70). The median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI 10.1-16.9) for pembrolizumab versus 8.3 months (95% CI 6.3-11.8) for placebo (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.37-0.80). ORR was 20.6% (95% CI 13.4-29.5) for pembrolizumab versus 2.0% (95% CI 0.1-10.6) for placebo (difference: 18.5%; 95% CI 8.3-27.6). The median DOR was 8.6 and 2.8 months for pembrolizumab and placebo, respectively. Any grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 63 patients (58.9%) receiving pembrolizumab and 24 patients (48.0%) receiving placebo; 14 (13.1%) and 2 (4.0%) patients experienced grade 3-5 TRAEs, respectively. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusion Pembrolizumab demonstrated antitumor activity and was well tolerated in the Asian subgroup of KEYNOTE-240. A trend toward greater benefit with pembrolizumab in the Asian subgroup was observed compared with the overall cohort, supporting further evaluation of pembrolizumab treatment in this population.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The intensity of the nodule on the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI is a promising imaging biomarker for predicting unfavorable response with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in patients with HCC.
Abstract: Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are promising agents for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the establishment of noninvasive measure that could predict the response to ICIs is challenging. This study aimed to evaluate tumor responses to ICIs using the hepatobiliary phase of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which was shown to reflect Wnt/β-catenin activating mutation. Methods: A total of 68 intrahepatic HCC nodules from 18 patients with unresectable HCC and Child-Pugh class A liver function who received anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monotherapy were enrolled in this study. All patients had viable intrahepatic lesions evaluable using the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI within the 6 months prior to the treatment. The relative enhancement ratio was calculated, and the time to nodular progression (TTnP) defined as 20% or more increase in each nodule was compared between higher or hypo-enhancement HCC nodules. Then, the progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) were compared between patients with and without HCC nodules with higher enhancement on hepatobiliary phase images. Results: The median PFS was 2.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4–4.0) months in patients with HCC nodules with higher enhancement (n = 8) and 5.8 (95% CI: 0.0–18.9) months in patients with hypointense HCC nodules (n = 10) (p = 0.007). The median TTnP of HCC nodules with higher enhancement (n = 23) was 1.97 (95% CI: 1.86–2.07) months and that of hypointense HCC nodules (n = 45) was not reached (p = 0.003). The ORR was 12.5% (1/8) versus 30.0% (3/10); the disease control rate was 37.5% (3/8) versus 70.0% (7/10), respectively, in patients with or without higher enhancement intrahepatic HCC nodules. Conclusion: The TTnP on HCC nodules with higher enhancement and the median PFS in patients who carried higher enhancement intrahepatic HCC nodules were significantly shorter than those in hypointense HCC nodules with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. The intensity of the nodule on the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI is a promising imaging biomarker for predicting unfavorable response with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in patients with HCC.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The major disadvantage of lenvatinib to treat advanced hepatocellular carcinoma is the lack of a posttreatment agent that has shown clear effectiveness, and this paper aims to address this problem.
Abstract: 278Background: In clinical practice, the major disadvantage of lenvatinib to treat advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the lack of a posttreatment agent that has shown clear effectiveness. T...

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An overall increasing trend of liver cancer was observed, especially among male subjects, older individuals, and countries with a higher prevalence of HCV-related liver cancer.
Abstract: Background This study aimed to evaluate the updated disease burden, risk factors, and temporal trends of liver cancer based on age, sex, and country Methods We estimated the incidence of liver cancer and its attribution to hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in 2018 based on the Global Cancer Observatory and World Health Organization (WHO) Cancer Causes database We extracted the prevalence of risk factors from the WHO Global Health Observatory to examine the associations by weighted linear regression The trend analysis used data from the Cancer Incidence in Five Continents and the WHO mortality database from 48 countries Temporal patterns of incidence and mortality were calculated using average annual percent change (AAPC) by joinpoint regression analysis Results The global incidence of liver cancer was (age-standardized rate [ASR]) 93 per 100,000 population in 2018, and there was an evident disparity in the incidence related to HBV (ASR 02-412) and HCV (ASR 04-435) A higher HCV/HBV-related incidence ratio was associated with a higher level of alcohol consumption (β 049), overweight (β 051), obesity (β 064), elevated cholesterol (β 070), gross domestic product (β 020), and Human Development Index (HDI; β 045) An increasing trend in incidence was identified in many countries, especially for male individuals, population aged ≥50 years, and countries with a higher HCV/HBV-related liver cancer incidence ratio Countries with the most drastic increase in male incidence were reported in India (AAPC 770), Ireland (AAPC 560), Sweden (AAPC 572), the UK (AAPC 559), and Norway (AAPC 487) Conclusion We observed an overall increasing trend of liver cancer, especially among male subjects, older individuals, and countries with a higher prevalence of HCV-related liver cancer More efforts are needed in enhancing lifestyle modifications and accessibility of antiviral treatment for these populations Future studies should investigate the reasons behind these epidemiological changes


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (p-RFA) for small single hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) in patients with single nodular HCCs ≤ 3 cm.
Abstract: Background Treatment outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (p-RFA) for small single hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) have not yet been fully compared. The aim of this study was to compare LLR and p-RFA as first-line treatment options in patients with single nodular HCCs ≤3 cm. Methods From January 2014 to December 2016, a total of 566 patients with single nodular HCC ≤3 cm treated by either LLR (n = 251) or p-RFA (n = 315) were included. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cumulative incidence of local tumor progression (LTP) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using the log-rank test. Treatment outcome of 2 treatment modalities was compared in the subgroup of patients according to the tumor location. Results There were no significant differences in overall survival between LLR and p-RFA (p = 0.160); however, 3-year RFS was demonstrated to be significantly higher after LLR (74.4%) than after p-RFA (66.0%) (p = 0.013), owing to its significantly lower cumulative incidence of LTP (2.1% at 3 years after LLR vs. 10.0% after p-RFA, p < 0.001). The complication rate of p-RFA was significantly lower than that of LLR (5.1 vs. 10.0%, p = 0.026). LLR also provided significantly better local tumor control than p-RFA for subscapular tumors (3-year LTP rates: 1.9 vs. 8.8%, p = 0.012), perivascular tumors (3-year LTP rates: 0.0 vs. 17.2%, p = 0.007), and tumors located in anteroinfero-lateral liver portions (3-year LTP rates: 0.0 vs. 10.7%, p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in LTP rates between LLR and p-RFA for non-subcapsular and non-perivascular tumors (p = 0.482) and for tumors in postero-superior liver portions (p = 0.380). Conclusions LLR can provide significantly better local tumor control than p-RFA for small single HCCs in subcapsular, perivascular, and anteroinferolateral liver portions and thus may be the preferred treatment option for these tumors.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Concurrent antibiotic use during immunotherapy was associated with higher mortality in patients with advanced HCC and the role of gut dysbiosis on responses to ICI should be examined.
Abstract: Background: Recent studies suggested that use of antibiotics may interfere with treatment responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We determined whether concurrent use of antibiotics during ICI therapy was associated with adverse outcomes in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: This is a territory-wide retrospective cohort study including all advanced HCC patients who received ICIs (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or ipilimumab) between January 2014 and December 2019. Exclusion criteria included prior liver transplantation and use of cabozantinib, regorafenib, or ramucirumab. The exposure of interest was concurrent antibiotic use within 30 days before or after the commencement of ICI. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of cancer-related mortality and all-cause mortality with antibiotic use was derived by propensity score (PS) matching in 1:2 ratio of covariates including baseline characteristics, causes of cirrhosis, Child-Pugh status, prior HCC treatment, comorbidities, concurrent medications, and laboratory results including alpha fetoprotein. Results: A total of 395 HCC patients who had received ICIs were included. During a median follow-up of 16.5 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 5.6–44.3), there were 286 (72.4%) deaths including 231 cancer-related deaths. The median time from the first ICI to event was 7.7 months (IQR: 4.0–16.8). PS matching of 56 antibiotic users with 99 nonusers showed that concurrent antibiotic use with ICI was associated with higher cancer-related (aHR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.08–2.54) and all-cause mortality (aHR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.17–2.28). Conclusions: Concurrent antibiotic use during immunotherapy was associated with higher mortality in patients with advanced HCC. Further studies should examine the role of gut dysbiosis on responses to ICI.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Better liver function at baseline, as measured by ALBI grade or CPS, may be prognostic for better survival outcomes in patients with uHCC undergoing treatment with lenvatinib or sorafenib.
Abstract: Introduction Baseline liver function among patients starting treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) impacts survival and could impact efficacy outcomes and safety profiles of treatments. This post hoc analysis of the phase 3 REFLECT study examined the efficacy and safety outcomes for lenvatinib and for sorafenib in patients with uHCC, assessed by Child-Pugh score (CPS) and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade. Methods Efficacy and safety were assessed in patient cohorts from REFLECT according to study entry baseline ALBI grade and CPS. Results Lenvatinib treatment generally provided survival benefits in all groups. Median overall survival (OS) among patients with an ALBI grade of 1 was consistently higher than among patients with an ALBI grade of 2 for both the lenvatinib and sorafenib arms (lenvatinib: 17.4 vs. 8.6 months; sorafenib: 14.6 vs. 7.7 months, respectively). Median OS among patients with a CPS of 5 was consistently higher than among patients with a CPS of 6 (lenvatinib: 15.3 vs. 9.4 months; sorafenib: 14.2 vs. 7.9 months, respectively). Progression-free survival and objective response rates for these ALBI grades and CPS demonstrated similar patterns. Among patients who received lenvatinib and experienced a treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse event leading to withdrawal, 6.6% had an ALBI grade of 1, while 13.3% had an ALBI grade of 2, and 7.9% had a CPS of 5, while 12.1% had a CPS of 6. Conclusions Better liver function at baseline, as measured by ALBI grade or CPS, may be prognostic for better survival outcomes in patients with uHCC undergoing treatment with lenvatinib or sorafenib.


Journal ArticleDOI
Masatoshi Kudo1
TL;DR: The most prominent clinical studies of adjuvant therapy for recurrence prevention conducted to date investigated vitamin K, retinoids (the NIK-333 study) and sorafenib (the STORM trial) as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: Hepatectomy and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have been established as curative therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, HCC still has a high recurrence rate after these treatments. A study of HCC pathology has shown that microscopic intrahepatic metastasis occurs in about 10% of tumors ≤2 cm, and microvascular invasion occurs in about 27% of these tumors [1]. Thus, even small HCCs (≤2 cm) have a risk of recurrence. Moreover, intrahepatic metastasis is a major problem for tumors >2 cm because increasing tumor size past this cutoff is correlated with an increased risk of intrahepatic metastasis and microvascular invasion [2]. One reason why the prognosis of HCC is so poor is that patients experience repeated recurrences even after curative treatment, and repeated treatments with RFA, hepatectomy, and transarterial chemoembolization deteriorate liver function in many patients, ultimately resulting in death from liver failure or from tumors that are not amenable to treatment with systemic therapy. This suggests that preventing recurrence of HCC after curative treatment could dramatically improve the prognosis. Several studies on the prevention of recurrence have been conducted to date, but all have failed [3, 4, 5]. Consequently, there currently remains an unmet need for research on adjuvant therapy after curative treatment for HCC. The most prominent clinical studies of adjuvant therapy for recurrence prevention conducted to date investigated vitamin K [3], retinoids (the NIK-333 study) [4], and sorafenib (the STORM trial) [5]. However, the 1-year recurrence rates were high (25%, 34%, and 42%, respectively) in the control arms of all these studies. Another study showed a 5-year recurrence rate of about 80% after curative treatment for HCC. Recurrence after curative treatment can occur early or late. Early recurrence is primarily associated with intrahepatic metastasis, whereas late recurrence is often multicentric in origin [6].

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyzed the 100 most influential articles over the past 4 decades using bibliometric citation analysis to characterize the evolution in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment.
Abstract: Introduction Over the past 4 decades, the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has changed dramatically. The publications that have had the most significant impact on HCC management have not been quantitatively analyzed. In this article, we analyzed the 100 most influential articles over the past 4 decades using bibliometric citation analysis to characterize the evolution in HCC treatment. Methods The top-cited publications were identified and analyzed from the Clarivate Analytics Web of Science Core Collection database. Results The 100 most cited articles were identified with an average of 738 citations (range: 349-6,799). There was an increase in the number of influential articles in the late 1990s, which was paralleled by an increase in reports focused on locoregional treatment of HCC. Most top 100 articles came from the USA (n = 35), followed by Italy (n = 28), mainland China (n = 26), and Japan (n = 24). The surgical management was the most studied topic (n = 33). The Annals of Surgery published the highest number of papers (n = 26) with 13,978 citations. While other 3 topics (surgical management, locoregional treatment, and outcome prediction) declined among publications beginning in the 2000s, there was an emergence of highly cited papers on targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors with a concomitant increase in the number of publications on systemic therapy. Conclusions Based on bibliometric analysis of the literature over the last 40 years, a comprehensive analysis of the most historically significant HCC management articles highlighted the key contributions made to the evolution and advancement of this specialist field. The data should provide clinicians and researchers insight into future directions relative to the advancement of HCC management.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The new 7–11 criteria had the best discriminative power in predicting radiologic response and survival in patients with intermediate-stage HCC undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).
Abstract: Background and Aims: For patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the definition of high tumor burden remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of different criteria of tumor burden in patients with intermediate-stage HCC undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Methods: From 2007 to 2019, 632 treatment-naive patients with intermediate-stage HCC undergoing TACE were retrospectively enrolled. We compared different criteria of tumor burden in discriminating radiologic response and survival, including up-to-7, up-to-11, 5–7, 7 lesions criteria, and newly proposed 7–11 criteria. Results: The proportions of patients classified as high tumor burden were varied by different criteria. Among the 5 criteria, 7–11 criteria have the best performance to discriminate complete response (CR) and overall survival (OS) after TACE. In patients with low, intermediate, and high tumor burden classified by 7–11 criteria, the CR rate was 21, 12, and 2.5%, respectively (p < 0.001), and the median OS was 33.1, 22.3, and 11.9 months, respectively (p < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, 7–11 criteria were significantly associated with CR (intermediate vs. high burden, odds ratio = 4.617, p = 0.002; low vs. high burden, odds ratio = 8.675, p < 0.001) and OS (intermediate vs. high burden, hazard ratio = 0.650, p < 0.001; low vs. high burden, hazard ratio = 0.520, p < 0.001). Seven to 11 criteria also had the lowest corrected Akaike information criteria, highest homogeneity value, and highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in predicting 1-, 2-, and 3-year mortality among all criteria. Conclusion: Conventional definitions of tumor burden were not optimal for patients with intermediate HCC. The new 7–11 criteria had the best discriminative power in predicting radiologic response and survival in patients with intermediate-stage HCC undergoing TACE.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the prognosis of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with Vp4 (tumor thrombosis of the main trunk or bilobar of the portal vein) is analyzed.
Abstract: Background Overall survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with Vp4 (tumor thrombosis of the main trunk or bilobar of the portal vein) is extremely poor. Purpose The purpose of this study is to clarify the prognosis of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with radiation therapy (RT) for advanced HCC with Vp4 and to analyze the factors that contribute to the prognosis. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, 51 HCC patients who were treated with HAIC and RT for portal vein tumor thrombosis and met the following criteria were enrolled: (i) with Vp4; (ii) Child-Pugh score of 5-7; (iii) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1; (iv) no history of systemic therapy; and (v) from September 2004 to April 2019. Results Median overall survival and median progression-free survival were 12.1 and 4.2 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed >50% of relative tumor volume in the liver (HR, 3.027; p = 0.008) and extrahepatic spread with (HR, 3.773; p = 0.040) as significant and independent factors of OS. The total overall response rate (ORR) was 19.6%; ORR in main tumor was 13.7%; and ORR in Vp4 was 51.0%. None of the patients who received HAIC combined with RT for advanced HCC with Vp4 developed hepatic failure. This combination therapy of HAIC with RT was safe and well tolerated in all cases. Conclusion Combination therapies of HAIC and RT might be good therapy for advanced HCC with Vp4.


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A switching monopolar no-touch RFA technique is a favorable treatment option and provides lower LTP after RFA compared with conventional RFA for small HCC.
Abstract: Introduction A switching monopolar no-touch radiofrequency ablation (RFA) technique is used for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, there have not been any randomized clinical trials comparing this technique to the conventional RFA technique. Objective This study aims to compare the results of two RFA techniques, and to comparatively identify more effective methods to reduce the progression of local tumors associated with small HCC (≤2.5 cm). Methods This prospective randomized clinical trial (NCT03375281) recruited a total of 116 participants (M:F, 93:23; 68.3 ± 8.4 years) between October 2016 and September 2017. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of local tumor progression (LTP) after RFA. Secondary outcomes included technical success rate, technique efficacy, and RFA procedure characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazard regression model were used. Results The mean follow-up period was 24.1 months. A sufficient ablative margin was more frequently achieved in the no-touch RFA group (57/60 = 95%) than in the conventional RFA group (50/64 = 78.1%) on immediate follow-up CT (p = 0.01). The cumulative incidence of LTP in the no-touch RFA group was significantly lower than that in the conventional RFA group (p = 0.02). In multivariable analysis, no-touch RFA was the only predictive factor for LTP (p = 0.04, hazard ratio = 0.2, 95% confidence interval = 0.04-0.94). Conclusions A switching monopolar no-touch RFA technique is a favorable treatment option and provides lower LTP after RFA compared with conventional RFA for small HCC.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Demographic and clinical features of HCC patients and region and type of treating facility were associated with surgical resection versus systemic treatment and factors associated with receipt of surgical resections in a US population were determined.
Abstract: Introduction Small studies from outside of the USA suggest excellent outcomes after surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with vascular invasion. The study aims to (1) compare overall survival after surgical resection and systemic therapy among patients with HCC and vascular invasion and (2) determine factors associated with receipt of surgical resection in a US population. Methods HCC patients with AJCC clinical TNM stage 7th T3BN0M0 diagnosed between 2010 and 2017 from the National Cancer Database were analyzed. Cox and logistic regression analyses identified factors associated with overall survival and receipt of surgical resection. Results Of 11,259 patients with T3BN0M0 HCC, 325 (2.9%) and 4,268 (37.9%) received surgical resection and systemic therapy, respectively. In multivariable analysis, surgical resection was associated with improved survival compared to systemic therapy (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.496, 95% confidence interval: 0.426-0.578) with a median survival of 21.4 and 8.1 months, respectively. Superiority of surgical resection was observed in noncirrhotic and cirrhotic subgroups and propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting adjusted analysis. Asians were more likely to receive surgical resection, whereas Charlson comorbidity ≥3, elevated alpha-fetoprotein, smaller tumor size, care in a community cancer program, and the South or West region were associated with a lower likelihood of surgical resection. Conclusion HCC patients with vascular invasion may benefit from surgical resection compared to systemic therapies. Demographic and clinical features of HCC patients and region and type of treating facility were associated with surgical resection versus systemic treatment.