10-Year Follow-up of Intensive Glucose Control in Type 2 Diabetes
read more
Citations
Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes.
European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (Version 2012)
The metabolic syndrome
Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2012
Glucose Control and Vascular Complications in Veterans with Type 2 Diabetes
References
The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)
Effects of an angiotensin-converting -enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients
Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34)
Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)
Related Papers (5)
Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)
Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes
Frequently Asked Questions (9)
Q2. What is the name of the study?
In both trials, enhanced risk reductions occurred despite the loss of within-trial differences in glucose levels and, in the Steno-2 Study, diminished differences in blood pressure and lipid levels, suggesting the persistence of effects of earlier improved metabolic management.
Q3. What was the main outcome of the study?
Of 5102 patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, 4209 were randomly assigned to receive either conventional therapy (dietary restriction) or intensive therapy (either sulfonylurea or insulin or, in overweight patients, metformin) for glucose control.
Q4. What was the effect of intensive glucose therapy on diabetes?
During the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who received intensive glucose therapy had a lower risk of microvascular complications than did those receiving conventional dietary therapy.
Q5. What were the risk reductions for any end point?
In the metformin group, significant risk reductions persisted for any diabetes-related end point (21%, P = 0.01), myocardial infarction (33%, P = 0.005), and death from any cause (27%, P = 0.002).
Q6. What was the effect of sulfonylurea on the risk of micro?
In the sulfonylurea–insulin group, relative reductions in risk persisted at 10 years for any diabetes-related end point (9%, P = 0.04) and microvascular disease (24%, P = 0.001), and risk reductions for myocardial infarction (15%, P = 0.01) and death from any cause (13%, P = 0.007) emerged over time, as more events occurred.
Q7. What did the authors do to determine whether metformin therapy improved glucose control?
The authors conducted post-trial monitoring to determine whether this improved glucose control persisted and whether such therapy had a long-term effect on macrovascular outcomes.
Q8. How long did the patients attend the UKPDS?
In post-trial monitoring, 3277 patients were asked to attend annual UKPDS clinics for 5 years, but no attempts were made to maintain their previously assigned therapies.
Q9. What were the results of the UKPDS?
Annual questionnaires were used to follow patients who were unable to attend the clinics, and all patients in years 6 to 10 were assessed through questionnaires.