scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

A Meta-Analysis on the Correlation Between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report Measures

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The results suggest that implicit and explicit measures are generally related but that higher order inferences and lack of conceptual correspondence can reduce the influence of automatic associations on explicit self-reports.
Abstract
Theoretically, low correlations between implicit and explicit measures can be due to (a) motivational biases in explicit self reports, (b) lack of introspective access to implicitly assessed representations, (c) factors influencing the retrieval of information from memory, (d) method-related characteristics of the two measures, or (e) complete independence of the underlying constructs. The present study addressed these questions from a meta-analytic perspective, investigating the correlation between the Implicit Association Test (IAT) and explicit self-report measures. Based on a sample of 126 studies, the mean effect size was .24, with approximately half of the variability across correlations attributable to moderator variables. Correlations systematically increased as a function of (a) increasing spontaneity of self-reports and (b) increasing conceptual correspondence between measures. These results suggest that implicit and explicit measures are generally related but that higher order inferences and lack of conceptual correspondence can reduce the influence of automatic associations on explicit self-reports.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Book

The WEIRDest People in the World

TL;DR: A review of the comparative database from across the behavioral sciences suggests both that there is substantial variability in experimental results across populations and that WEIRD subjects are particularly unusual compared with the rest of the species – frequent outliers.
Journal ArticleDOI

Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.

TL;DR: A review of 122 research reports (184 independent samples, 14,900 subjects) found average r =.274 for prediction of behavioral, judgment, and physiological measures by Implicit Association Test (IAT) measures as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.

TL;DR: An integrative review of the available evidence on implicit and explicit attitude change that is guided by a distinction between associative and propositional processes is provided.
Journal ArticleDOI

An inkblot for attitudes: affect misattribution as implicit measurement.

TL;DR: The affect misattributions procedure (AMP) was sensitive to normatively favorable and unfavorable evaluations, and the misattribution effect was strong at both fast and slow presentation rates.

The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review

TL;DR: In psychology, the ability to introspect comes with the palpable feeling of " knowing, " of being objective or certain, of being mentally in control of one's thoughts, aware of the causes of the thoughts, feelings, and actions, and of making decisions deliberately and rationally as discussed by the authors.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

"Unlearning" automatic biases: The malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes.

TL;DR: The present research suggests that automatic and controlled intergroup biases can be modified through diversity education and suggests that these may effectively be changed through affective processes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Implicit Attitude Formation Through Classical Conditioning

TL;DR: It is shown that attitudes can develop through implicit covariation detection in a new classical conditioning paradigm and attitudes toward the novel objects were influenced by the paired USs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudice.

TL;DR: These reported experiments tested the hypothesis that automatic racial prejudice is subject to common social influence, and found that both tacit and expressed social influence reduced the expression of automatic prejudice, as assessed by two different measures of automatic attitudes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT

TL;DR: Two experiments were conducted to investigate the psychometric properties of an Implicit Association Test that was adapted to measure implicit attitudes towards homosexuality, and it was shown that uninformed participants were able to fake positive explicit but not implicit attitudes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3.

TL;DR: It seems appropriate to conclude that the IAT assesses constructs that are often (but not always) distinct from the corresponding constructs measured by self-report.
Related Papers (5)