scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

A Randomized Effectiveness Trial of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Medication for Primary Care Panic Disorder

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Delivery of evidence-based CBT and medication using the collaborative care model and a CBT-naive, midlevel behavioral health specialist is feasible and significantly more effective than usual care for primary care panic disorder.
Abstract
Objective: To implement and test the effectiveness of a combined pharmacotherapy and cognitive-behavioral intervention for panic disorder tailored to the primary care setting. Design: Randomized, controlled study comparing intervention to treatment as usual. Setting: Six primary care clinics associated with 3 university medical schools, serving an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse patient population. Participants: Two hundred thirty-two primary care patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for panic disorder. Comorbid mental and physical disorders were permitted, provided these did not contraindicate the treatment to be provided and were not acutely life threatening. Intervention: Patients were randomized to receive either treatment as usual or an intervention consisting of a combination of up to 6 sessions (across 12 weeks) of cognitivebehavioral therapy (CBT) modified for the primary care setting, with up to 6 follow-up telephone contacts during the next 9 months, and algorithm-based pharmacotherapy provided by the primary care physician with guidance from a psychiatrist. Behavioral health specialists, the majority inexperienced in CBT for panic disorder, were trained to deliver the CBT and coordinated overall care, including pharmacotherapy. Main Outcomes Measures: Proportion of subjects remitted (no panic attacks in the past month, minimal anticipatory anxiety, and agoraphobia subscale score 10 on Fear Questionnaire) and responding (Anxiety Sensitivity Index score 20) and change over time in World Health Organization Disability Scale and short form 12 scores. Results: The combined cognitive-behavioral and pharmacotherapeutic intervention resulted in sustained and gradually increasing improvement relative to treatment as usual, with significantly higher rates at all points of both the proportion of subjects remitted (3 months, 20% vs 12%; 12 months, 29% vs 16%) and responding (3 months, 46% vs 27%; 12 months, 63% vs 38%) and significantly greater improvements in World Health Organization Disability Scale (all points) and short form 12 mental health functioning (3 and 6 months) scores. These effects were obtained in spite of similar rates of delivery of guideline-concordant pharmacotherapy to the 2 groups. Conclusion: Delivery of evidence-based CBT and medication using the collaborative care model and a CBTnaive, midlevel behavioral health specialist is feasible and significantly more effective than usual care for primary care panic disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:290-298

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems

TL;DR: Collaborative care is associated with significant improvement in depression and anxiety outcomes compared with usual care, and represents a useful addition to clinical pathways for adult patients with depression and Anxiety.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mind the gap: Improving the dissemination of CBT

TL;DR: The aim of this paper is to identify the barriers to the dissemination of evidence-based psychological treatments and then propose ways of overcoming them, hence potentially bridging the gap between research findings and clinical practice.

Integration of Mental Health/Substance Abuse and Primary Care

TL;DR: There is a reasonably strong body of evidence to encourage integrated care, at least for depression, and there is no discernible effect of integration level, processes of care, or combination on patient outcomes for mental health services in primary care settings.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population

TL;DR: The CES-D scale as discussed by the authors is a short self-report scale designed to measure depressive symptomatology in the general population, which has been used in household interview surveys and in psychiatric settings.
Book

Bayesian Data Analysis

TL;DR: Detailed notes on Bayesian Computation Basics of Markov Chain Simulation, Regression Models, and Asymptotic Theorems are provided.
Book

Bayes and Empirical Bayes Methods for Data Analysis

TL;DR: Approaches for Statistical Inference: The Bayes Approach, Model Criticism and Selection, and Performance of Bayes Procedures.
Journal ArticleDOI

Brief standard self-rating for phobic patients.

TL;DR: A one-page self-rating form is described to monitor change in phobia patients, derived from earlier versions used in 1000 phobic club members and 300 phobic patients, which is short, reliable and valid.
Related Papers (5)