scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) : defining cut-off values for disease activity states and improvement scores

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Cut-off values for disease activity states and improvement using the Ankylosing SpondyloArthritis Disease Activity Score have been developed and proved to have external validity and a good performance compared to existing criteria.
Abstract
Background The Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) is a new composite index to assess disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). It fulfi ls important aspects of truth, feasibility and discrimination. Criteria for disease activity states and improvement scores are important for use in clinical practice, observational studies and clinical trials and so far have not been developed for the ASDAS. Objective To determine clinically relevant cut-off values for disease activity states and improvement scores using the ASDAS. Methods For the selection of cut-offs data from the Norwegian disease modifying antirheumatic drug (NORDMARD) registry, a cohort of patients with AS starting conventional or biological DMARDs, were used. Receiver operating characteristic analysis against several external criteria was performed and several approaches to determine the optimal cut-offs used. The fi nal choice was made on clinical and statistical grounds, after debate and voting by Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society members. Crossvalidation was performed in NOR-DMARD and in Ankylosing Spondylitis Study for the Evaluation of Recombinant Infl iximab Therapy, a database of patients with AS participating in a randomised placebo-controlled trial with a tumour necrosis factor blocker. Results Four disease activity states were chosen by consensus: inactive disease, moderate, high and very high disease activity. The three cut-offs selected to separate these states were: 1.3, 2.1 and 3.5 units. Selected cut-offs for improvement were: change ≥1.1 units for clinically important improvement and change ≥2.0 units for major improvement. Results of the crossvalidation strongly supported the cut-offs. Conclusions Cut-off values for disease activity states and improvement using the ASDAS have been developed. They proved to have external validity and a good performance compared to existing criteria.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 compared with maintained treatment with originator infliximab (NOR-SWITCH): a 52-week, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial

TL;DR: The NOR-SWITCH trial showed that switching from originator infliximab originator to CT-P13 was not inferior to continued treatment with inflIXimaboriginator according to a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 15%.
Journal ArticleDOI

Treating axial spondyloarthritis and peripheral spondyloarthritis, especially psoriatic arthritis, to target: 2017 update of recommendations by an international task force

TL;DR: There was broad agreement, now better supported by data than in 2012, that remission/inactive disease and, alternatively, low/minimal disease activity are the principal targets for the treatment of PsA.
Journal ArticleDOI

Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis : results of a randomised placebo-controlled trial (ABILITY-1)

TL;DR: Results from ABILITY-1 suggest that adalimumab has a positive benefit–risk profile in active nr-axSpA patients with inadequate response to NSAIDs and the safety profile was consistent with what is known for ad alimumab in ankylosing spondylitis and other diseases.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors defined clinically significant change as the extent to which therapy moves someone outside the range of the dysfunctional population or within the ranges of the functional population, and proposed a reliable change index (RC) to determine whether the magnitude of change for a given client is statistically reliable.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria.

TL;DR: The study showed the clinical history screening test for AS to be moderately sensitive, but it might be better in clinical practice, and substitution of the Rome pain criterion for the New York pain criterion is proposed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Measurement of health status: Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference

TL;DR: An approach to elucidating the significance of changes in score in quality of life instruments by comparing them to global ratings of change is developed, and a plausible range within which the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) falls is established.
Journal ArticleDOI

Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation

TL;DR: In most circumstances, the threshold of discrimination for changes in health-related quality of life for chronic diseases appears to be approximately half a SD, which research in psychology has shown is approximately 1 part in 7.
Related Papers (5)