scispace - formally typeset
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces

Paul Dourish, +1 more
- pp 107-114
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A study of shared editor use is discussed which suggests that awareness information provided and exploited passively through the shared workspace, allows users to move smoothly between close and loose collaboration, and to assign and coordinate work dynamically.
Abstract
Awareness of individual and group activities is critical to successful collaboration and is commonly supported in CSCW systems by active, information generation mechanisms separate from the shared workspace. These mechanisms pena~ise information providers, presuppose relevance to the recipient, and make access difficult, We discuss a study of shared editor use which suggests that awareness information provided and exploited passively through the shared workspace, allows users to move smoothly between close and loose collaboration, and to assign and coordinate work dynamically. Passive awareness mechanisms promise effective support for collaboration requiring this sort of behaviour, whilst avoiding problems with active approaches.

read more

Citations
More filters
BookDOI

Social Information Seeking

Chirag Shah
TL;DR: The chapter introduces several concepts that relate to SIS, such as information seeking/retrieval/behavior, social media/networking, social search, question-answering, and collaborative information seeking (CIS), and uses the interconnections among these concepts to set the stage for studying and addressing various topics in SIS.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Conceptual Model and Taxonomy for Collaborative Augmented Reality

TL;DR: In this paper , an analysis of the different dimensions that should be taken into account when analysing the contributions of AR to the collaborative work effort is performed, and an extended human-centered taxonomy for the categorization of the main features of Collaborative AR is proposed.
Posted Content

Media affordances of a mobile push-to-talk communication service

TL;DR: An exploratory study of college-age students using two- way, push-to-talk cellular radios finds that although the radios have many important dissimilarities with IM, the observed use patterns resembled those of IM to a surprising degree.

Good to use! Use quality of multi-user applications in the home

TL;DR: The use qualities to design for in infotainment services on interactive television are laidback interaction, togetherness among users, and entertainment, quite different from bank office software that usually is characterised by not only traditional usability criteria such as learnability, flexibility, effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction.
Journal ArticleDOI

Perceived group cohesion versus actual social structure: A study using social network analysis of egocentric Facebook networks.

TL;DR: The potential of social network analysis, visualization tools, and Facebook data for advancing research on groups is discussed, suggesting that people perceive smaller groups as more cohesive.
References
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group

TL;DR: Initial experiences of the system in use at EuroPARC and PARC suggest that Portholes both supports shared awareness and helps to build a “sense of community”.
Journal ArticleDOI

Concurrency control in groupware systems

C. A. Ellis, +1 more
TL;DR: An algorithm for concurrency control in real-time groupware systems is presented and its advantages are its simplicity of use and its responsiveness: users can operate directly on the data without obtaining locks.
Journal ArticleDOI

RCS—a system for version control

TL;DR: Basic version control concepts are introduced and the practice of version control using RCS is discussed, and usage statistics show that RCS's delta method is space and time efficient.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluationof organizational interfaces

TL;DR: Examination of several application areas reveals a common dynamic: a factor contributing to the application’s failure is the disparity between those who will benefit from an application and those who must do additional work to support it.