scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

British Fungus Flora

M. C. Cooke
- 01 Dec 1893 - 
- Vol. 49, Iss: 1261, pp 195-196
TLDR
With these modifications, the authors see no reason why, with two supplementary volumes to contain all the Ascomycetes the five volumes might not be accepted as a fair approximation to a “British Fungus Flora.”
Abstract
IT was originally estimated that this work would be completed in three volumes, but, as we pointed out in our first notice, this was practically impossible. A notice now accompanies the third volume, to the effect that a supplementary volume will speedily be published in conclusion of the work. The second volume continues the Hymenomycetes, which occupy 268 pages also of the third volume, so that two and a half volumes are occupied by the Hymenomycetes, leaving 220 pages for the Hyphomycetes, which bring the third volume to a close. It is only necessary to enumerate the remaining orders to appreciate the difficulty of completing even with a fourth volume. There are all the Ascomycetes, which occupied in Cooke's “Handbook” an equal number of pages to the Hymenomycetes; and supposing the increase to have been in the same ratio, it may be conjectured that this order (including the Discomycetes) cannot be compressed into less than two volumes. For all that remains afterwards, there will not be so much necessity. There would be the Sphaeropsideae and Melanconieae, which are of minor interest, although numbering perhaps 700 species. The Phycomyceteae, which have recently been the subject of a volume, by the same author, as “British Fungi, Phycomycetes, and Ustilagineae.” Hence they may be dispensed with. The Uredineae, which, with the Ustilagineae, formed a volume by C. B. Plowright in 1889, have had so few accessions that a revision is not imperative. The Myxomycetes, which occupied a monograph by G. Massee in 1892, is all-sufficient. As to the Saccharomycetes and the Schisomycetes, the little volume by W. B. Grove, dated 1884, would furnish an introduction, and would be fairly complete to that date, in genera and species. With these modifications, we see no reason why, with two supplementary volumes to contain all the Ascomycetes the five volumes might not be accepted as a fair approximation to a “British Fungus Flora.” British Fungus Flora; a Classified Text-book of Mycology. By George Massee. Vols II. and III. (London: Geo. Bell and Sons, 1893.)

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Families of Dothideomycetes

Kevin D. Hyde, +72 more
- 10 Dec 2013 - 
TL;DR: Dothideomycetes comprise a highly diverse range of fungi characterized mainly by asci with two wall layers (bitunicate asci) and often with fissitunicate dehiscence, and it is hoped that by illustrating types they provide stimulation and interest so that more work is carried out in this remarkable group of fungi.
Book

How to Identify Mushrooms to Genus III: Microscopic Features

TL;DR: This tutorial discusses how to identify mushrooms to genus iii microscopic and california mushrooms syllabus uc berkeley college of lab # and some of the features of that work.
Journal ArticleDOI

Phylogenetic relationships in the mushroom genus Coprinus and dark-spored allies based on sequence data from the nuclear gene coding for the large ribosomal subunit RNA: divergent domains, outgroups, and monophyly.

TL;DR: Phylogenetic analyses employing topological constraints suggest that none of the major taxonomic systems proposed for subgeneric classification is able to completely reflect phylogenetic relationships in Coprinus.
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessment of fungal diversity: macromycetes, the problems

Roy Watling
- 31 Dec 1995 - 
TL;DR: The various difficulties in recording macromycetes and assessing their diversity are given and their diversity is explored based on both temperate and tropical information.
Journal ArticleDOI

A molecular phylogenetic reappraisal of the Hysteriaceae, Mytilinidiaceae and Gloniaceae (Pleosporomycetidae, Dothideomycetes) with keys to world species

TL;DR: A reappraisal of the phylogenetic integrity of bitunicate ascomycete fungi belonging to or previously affiliated with the Hysteriaceae, Mytilinidiaceae, Gloniaceae and Patellariaceae is presented, based on an analysis of 121 isolates and four nuclear genes.