scispace - formally typeset
Open Access

Classification and Regression by randomForest

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
random forests are proposed, which add an additional layer of randomness to bagging and are robust against overfitting, and the randomForest package provides an R interface to the Fortran programs by Breiman and Cutler.
Abstract
Recently there has been a lot of interest in “ensemble learning” — methods that generate many classifiers and aggregate their results. Two well-known methods are boosting (see, e.g., Shapire et al., 1998) and bagging Breiman (1996) of classification trees. In boosting, successive trees give extra weight to points incorrectly predicted by earlier predictors. In the end, a weighted vote is taken for prediction. In bagging, successive trees do not depend on earlier trees — each is independently constructed using a bootstrap sample of the data set. In the end, a simple majority vote is taken for prediction. Breiman (2001) proposed random forests, which add an additional layer of randomness to bagging. In addition to constructing each tree using a different bootstrap sample of the data, random forests change how the classification or regression trees are constructed. In standard trees, each node is split using the best split among all variables. In a random forest, each node is split using the best among a subset of predictors randomly chosen at that node. This somewhat counterintuitive strategy turns out to perform very well compared to many other classifiers, including discriminant analysis, support vector machines and neural networks, and is robust against overfitting (Breiman, 2001). In addition, it is very user-friendly in the sense that it has only two parameters (the number of variables in the random subset at each node and the number of trees in the forest), and is usually not very sensitive to their values. The randomForest package provides an R interface to the Fortran programs by Breiman and Cutler (available at http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/ users/breiman/). This article provides a brief introduction to the usage and features of the R functions.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Bug prediction based on fine-grained module histories

TL;DR: Using a correlation analysis, it is shown that past bug information does not contribute to method-level bug prediction, and fine-grained (method-level) prediction outperforms coarse- grained (package and file levels) prediction when taking the efforts necessary to find bugs into account.
Journal ArticleDOI

Random Forests machine learning applied to gas chromatography – mass spectrometry derived average mass spectrum data sets for classification and characterisation of essential oils

TL;DR: The RF model was applied to the classification of 20 different EOs and the SAMS data set showed superior potential for quality assurance, compared with TCAMS, and the minimal number of variables necessary for EO classification was determined.
Journal ArticleDOI

Multi-omics differentially classify disease state and treatment outcome in pediatric Crohn’s disease

TL;DR: It is demonstrated for the first time that useful predictors of CD treatment response can be produced from shotgun MGS sequencing of biopsy samples despite the complications related to large proportions of host DNA.
Journal ArticleDOI

Improving the Spatial Prediction of Soil Organic Carbon Content in Two Contrasting Climatic Regions by Stacking Machine Learning Models and Rescanning Covariate Space

TL;DR: The stacking of diverse sets of models could be used to more accurately estimate the spatial distribution of SOC content in different climatic regions and indicates that rescanning the original covariate space by a meta-learning model can extract more information and improve the SOC content prediction accuracy.
References
More filters

Modern Applied Statistics With S

TL;DR: The modern applied statistics with s is universally compatible with any devices to read, and is available in the digital library an online access to it is set as public so you can download it instantly.
Proceedings Article

Boosting the margin: A new explanation for the effectiveness of voting methods

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that the test error of the generated classifier usually does not increase as its size becomes very large, and often is observed to decrease even after the training error reaches zero.
Journal ArticleDOI

Estimating Generalization Error on Two-Class Datasets Using Out-of-Bag Estimates

TL;DR: For two-class datasets, a method for estimating the generalization error of a bag using out-of-bag estimates is provided and most of the bias is eliminated and accuracy is increased by incorporating a correction based on the distribution of the out- of-bag votes.