scispace - formally typeset
Open Access

Classification and Regression by randomForest

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
random forests are proposed, which add an additional layer of randomness to bagging and are robust against overfitting, and the randomForest package provides an R interface to the Fortran programs by Breiman and Cutler.
Abstract
Recently there has been a lot of interest in “ensemble learning” — methods that generate many classifiers and aggregate their results. Two well-known methods are boosting (see, e.g., Shapire et al., 1998) and bagging Breiman (1996) of classification trees. In boosting, successive trees give extra weight to points incorrectly predicted by earlier predictors. In the end, a weighted vote is taken for prediction. In bagging, successive trees do not depend on earlier trees — each is independently constructed using a bootstrap sample of the data set. In the end, a simple majority vote is taken for prediction. Breiman (2001) proposed random forests, which add an additional layer of randomness to bagging. In addition to constructing each tree using a different bootstrap sample of the data, random forests change how the classification or regression trees are constructed. In standard trees, each node is split using the best split among all variables. In a random forest, each node is split using the best among a subset of predictors randomly chosen at that node. This somewhat counterintuitive strategy turns out to perform very well compared to many other classifiers, including discriminant analysis, support vector machines and neural networks, and is robust against overfitting (Breiman, 2001). In addition, it is very user-friendly in the sense that it has only two parameters (the number of variables in the random subset at each node and the number of trees in the forest), and is usually not very sensitive to their values. The randomForest package provides an R interface to the Fortran programs by Breiman and Cutler (available at http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/ users/breiman/). This article provides a brief introduction to the usage and features of the R functions.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Learned lessons in credit card fraud detection from a practitioner perspective

TL;DR: This paper provides some answers from the practitioner’s perspective by focusing on three crucial issues: unbalancedness, non-stationarity and assessment in fraud detection algorithms.
Journal ArticleDOI

DNA methylation contributes to natural human variation

TL;DR: In this article, the contribution of DNA methylation patterns to variability in human variation was investigated, and it was found that one third of the differences were not associated with any genetic variation, suggesting that variation in population-specific sites takes place at the genetic and epigenetic levels.
Journal ArticleDOI

Random Forests for Global and Regional Crop Yield Predictions.

TL;DR: Random Forests was found highly capable of predicting crop yields and outperformed MLR benchmarks in all performance statistics that were compared, and may result in a loss of accuracy when predicting the extreme ends or responses beyond the boundaries of the training data.
Journal ArticleDOI

Classification with correlated features

TL;DR: It is demonstrated that Lasso logistic regression, fused support vector machine, group Lasso and random forest models suffer from correlation bias, and two related methods for group selection based on feature clustering can be used for correcting the correlation bias.
Journal Article

Confidence intervals for random forests: the jackknife and the infinitesimal jackknife

TL;DR: The variability of predictions made by bagged learners and random forests are studied, and how to estimate standard errors for these methods are shown, and improved versions of jackknife and IJ estimators are proposed that only require B = Θ(n) replicates to converge.
References
More filters

Modern Applied Statistics With S

TL;DR: The modern applied statistics with s is universally compatible with any devices to read, and is available in the digital library an online access to it is set as public so you can download it instantly.
Proceedings Article

Boosting the margin: A new explanation for the effectiveness of voting methods

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that the test error of the generated classifier usually does not increase as its size becomes very large, and often is observed to decrease even after the training error reaches zero.
Journal ArticleDOI

Estimating Generalization Error on Two-Class Datasets Using Out-of-Bag Estimates

TL;DR: For two-class datasets, a method for estimating the generalization error of a bag using out-of-bag estimates is provided and most of the bias is eliminated and accuracy is increased by incorporating a correction based on the distribution of the out- of-bag votes.