scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This guideline update used an existing systematic evidence review of the CRC screening literature and microsimulation modeling analyses, including a new evaluation of the age to begin screening by race and sex and additional modeling that incorporates changes in US CRC incidence.
Abstract
In the United States, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most common cancer diagnosed among adults and the second leading cause of death from cancer. For this guideline update, the American Cancer Society (ACS) used an existing systematic evidence review of the CRC screening literature and microsimulation modeling analyses, including a new evaluation of the age to begin screening by race and sex and additional modeling that incorporates changes in US CRC incidence. Screening with any one of multiple options is associated with a significant reduction in CRC incidence through the detection and removal of adenomatous polyps and other precancerous lesions and with a reduction in mortality through incidence reduction and early detection of CRC. Results from modeling analyses identified efficient and model-recommendable strategies that started screening at age 45 years. The ACS Guideline Development Group applied the Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria in developing and rating the recommendations. The ACS recommends that adults aged 45 years and older with an average risk of CRC undergo regular screening with either a high-sensitivity stool-based test or a structural (visual) examination, depending on patient preference and test availability. As a part of the screening process, all positive results on noncolonoscopy screening tests should be followed up with timely colonoscopy. The recommendation to begin screening at age 45 years is a qualified recommendation. The recommendation for regular screening in adults aged 50 years and older is a strong recommendation. The ACS recommends (qualified recommendations) that: 1) average-risk adults in good health with a life expectancy of more than 10 years continue CRC screening through the age of 75 years; 2) clinicians individualize CRC screening decisions for individuals aged 76 through 85 years based on patient preferences, life expectancy, health status, and prior screening history; and 3) clinicians discourage individuals older than 85 years from continuing CRC screening. The options for CRC screening are: fecal immunochemical test annually; high-sensitivity, guaiac-based fecal occult blood test annually; multitarget stool DNA test every 3 years; colonoscopy every 10 years; computed tomography colonography every 5 years; and flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:250-281. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.

TL;DR: The GLOBOCAN 2020 estimates of cancer incidence and mortality produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as mentioned in this paper show that female breast cancer has surpassed lung cancer as the most commonly diagnosed cancer, with an estimated 2.3 million new cases (11.7%), followed by lung cancer, colorectal (11 4.4%), liver (8.3%), stomach (7.7%) and female breast (6.9%), and cervical cancer (5.6%) cancers.
Journal ArticleDOI

Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020.

TL;DR: Progress against CRC can be accelerated by increasing access to guideline‐recommended screening and high‐quality treatment, particularly among Alaska Natives, and elucidating causes for rising incidence in young and middle‐aged adults.
Journal ArticleDOI

Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies

TL;DR: With increasing incidence of CRC at younger ages, there is an urgent need to better identify high-risk individuals younger than 50 years, the age when screening typically starts, and aspirin probably confers chemopreventive benefit against CRC.
Journal ArticleDOI

Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, part I: National cancer statistics

TL;DR: The American Cancer Society, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) collaborate to provide annual updates on cancer occurrence and trends in the United States.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Effectiveness and Reach of the FLU-FIT Program in an Integrated Health Care System: A Multisite Randomized Trial

TL;DR: This intervention may increase CRCS among those not reached by other forms of CRCS outreach and future research should include the extent to which these programs can be disseminated and implemented nationally.

Key considerations in designing a patient navigation program for colorectal cancer screening

Amy DeGroff
TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe 10 key considerations in designing a patient navigation intervention for colorectal cancer screening based on a literature review and environmental scan, including identifying a theoretical framework and setting program goals, specifying community characteristics, establishing the point(s) of intervention within the cancer continuum, determining the setting in which navigation services are provided, identifying the range of services offered and patient navigator responsibilities, selecting the method of communications between patients and navigators, designing the navigator training, defining oversight and supervision for the navigators and evaluating patient navigation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Long-term Follow-up of Patients Having False-Positive Multitarget Stool DNA Tests after Negative Screening Colonoscopy: The LONG-HAUL Cohort Study

TL;DR: Although FP status was associated with long-term aerodigestive cancers, new cases were not temporally related and did not exceed incidence estimates from general population, and these observations do not justify aggressive follow-up evaluation for patients with FP MT-sDNA at this time.
Journal ArticleDOI

Key considerations in designing a patient navigation program for colorectal cancer screening.

TL;DR: 10 key considerations in designing a patient navigation intervention for colorectal cancer screening based on a literature review and environmental scan are described.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of patient preferences for fecal immunochemical test or colonoscopy using the analytic hierarchy process

TL;DR: Patients’ test preferences should be considered when ordering a colorectal cancer screening test, as patients slightly preferred FIT over colonoscopy.
Related Papers (5)