Journal ArticleDOI
Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions
Reads0
Chats0
About:
This article is published in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.The article was published on 1992-11-01. It has received 578 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Contextualism & Contemporary philosophy.read more
Citations
More filters
Conhecimento e justificação: a origem de debate entre internalismo vs. externalismo Knowledge and justification: the origin of the debate between internalism and externalism
João Batista,C. Sieczkowski +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyse the arguments from the proposals brought by epistemologists who are against or for the separation between knowledge and justifi cation or rationality and conclude that it is not possible to refute, it is only possible to live with skepticism as if it were part of the human condition.
Journal Article
Liberalismo político y deliberación pública
TL;DR: The authors elabora un nuevo argumento a favor of the posicion of Rawls. But, as stated by The authors, satisfacer esa concepcion de la legitimidad exige apelar, en la justificacion publica de la accion del Estado, a "concepciones politicas de la justicia".
Book
Beings of Thought and Action: Epistemic and Practical Rationality
TL;DR: Mueller as discussed by the authors examines the ways in which epistemic and practical rationality are intertwined, and proposes a contextualist account of epistemic norms for practical reasoning and introduces novel epistemic norm pertaining to ends and hope.
Journal ArticleDOI
Testimonial Kinds: The Source Factor
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors argue that the nature of testimony necessitates that we distinguish between testimonies that are based on the informant's sense perception, inference, or on a longer testimonial chain, and they further argue that this distinction has epistemic significance, in that it helps us better understand how reliable certain classes of testimonies are and how reliable individuals are, based upon the epistemic source that their testimony is ultimately grounded in.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Power of Appearances
TL;DR: In this paper, a modified version of the skeptical puzzle is presented, based on knowledge claims about appearances and does not result in a paradox, and the elements of both the original and modified puzzle can potentially guide us towards solutions that can fully explain the conflict of epistemic intuitions.