Costs of asthma are correlated with severity: a 1-yr prospective study

TLDR: This is the first study in asthma to combine rigorous independent classification of grades of severity in statistically valid numbers of patients of grades receiving “real-world” treatment and followed-up prospectively for 1 yr, allowing severity to be accurately related to direct, indirect and intangible costs of asthma.

Abstract: Asthma prevalence is increasing and asthma-related costs are likely to increase, but few studies have analysed the relationship of asthma costs and severity. The impact of severity on costs was quantified in a cohort of 318 asthmatic patients followed up prospectively for 1 yr. Patients presenting with a broad range of severity of the disease (intermittent, mild persistent, moderate persistent, severe persistent) were recruited by chest physicians throughout France and treated for 1 yr according to customary clinical practice and following international guidelines. Severity, direct and indirect costs, and quality of life (QoL) were assessed. A multivariate analysis was conducted to relate factors contributing to the costs measured. Mean direct costs for goods and services excluding hospitalization, numbers of consultations, supplementary examinations, and the use and cost of bronchodilators and corticosteroids, indirect costs of days lost from work, and adverse QoL parameters all increased significantly with increasing severity. This also applied to mean age, body weight, asthma duration, depression of forced expiratory volume in one second, and inhaled corticosteroid posology in the 234 patients completing the study. There was a significant relationship (r=0.614, p<0.001) between direct costs (hospitalization and cures were excluded) and three domains of the QoL questionnaire (mobility, pain and energy). Overall costs of asthma (including individual direct costs, indirect costs, and intangible quality of life costs) are clearly related to severity. This is the first study in asthma to combine rigorous independent classification of grades of severity in statistically valid numbers of patients of grades receiving "real-world" treatment and followed-up prospectively for 1 yr. It allowed severity to be accurately related to direct, indirect and intangible costs of asthma. Quality of life explained a significant part of these costs.