scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted ContentDOI

Direct and indirect effectiveness of mRNA vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection in long-term care facilities in Spain

TLDR
In this paper, the effects of COVID-19 vaccination in residents in long-term care facilities (LTCF) were investigated. And the results confirm the effectiveness of mRNA vaccination in institutionalized elderly population, endorse the policy of universal vaccination in this setting, including in people with previous infection, and suggest that even non-vaccinated individuals benefit from indirect protection.
Abstract
Objectives To estimate indirect and total (direct plus indirect) effects of COVID-19 vaccination in residents in long-term care facilities (LTCF). Design Registries-based cohort study including all residents in LTCF ≥65 years offered vaccination between 27 December 2020 and 10 March 2021. Risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection following vaccination was compared with the risk in the same individuals in a period before vaccination. Risk in non-vaccinated was also compared to a period before the vaccination programme to estimate indirect protection. Standardized cumulative risk was computed adjusted by previous documented infection (before the start of follow-up) and daily-varying SARS-CoV-2 incidence and reproductive number. Participants 573,533 records of 299,209 individuals in the National vaccination registry were selected; 99.0% had ≥1 vaccine-dose, 99.8% was Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2). Residents mean age was 85.9, 70.9% were females. A previous SARS-CoV-2 infection was found in around 25% and 13% of participants, respectively, at the time of vaccine offer and in the reference period. Main outcome measures Documented SARS-CoV-2 infection identified in the National COVID-19 laboratory registry. Results Total VE was 57.2% (95% Confidence Interval: 56.1%-58.3%), and was highest ≥28 days after the first vaccine-dose (proxy of ≥7 days after the second dose) and for individuals naive to SARS-CoV-2 [81.8% (81.0%-82.7%)] compared to those with previous infection [56.8% (47.1%-67.7%)]. Vaccination prevented up to 9.6 (9.3-9.9) cases per 10.000 vaccinated per day; 11.6 (11.3-11.9) if naive vs. 0.8 (0.5-1.0) if previous infection. Indirect protection in the non-vaccinated could only be estimated for naive individuals, at 81.4% (73.3%-90.3%) and up to 12.8 (9.4-16.2) infections prevented per 10.000 indirectly protected per day. Conclusions Our results confirm the effectiveness of mRNA vaccination in institutionalized elderly population, endorse the policy of universal vaccination in this setting, including in people with previous infection, and suggest that even non-vaccinated individuals benefit from indirect protection. Key messages COIVD-19 vaccination reduced the risk of documented SARS-CoV-2 infection in institutionalized elderly by 57.2% (56.1% to 58.3%), which increased to 81.2% (80.2% to 82%) for the fully vaccinated. In individuals naive to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination reduced the risk by up to 81.8% and averted up to 11.6 cases per 10,000 vaccinated persons per day. Those with previous infection also benefited from a risk reduction of 57%, which translated in less than 1 infection averted per 10,000 vaccinated persons per day. Non-vaccinated individuals living in facilities where the majority (residents and staff) had been vaccinated showed a risk reduction similar to those actually vaccinated.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

1
Direct and indirect effectiveness of mRNA vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection
1
in long-term care facilities in Spain
2
Susana Monge
1
, Carmen Olmedo
2
, Belén Alejos, María Lapeña
3
, María José Sierra
1
*,
3
Aurora Limia
2
* and the COVID-19 registries study group.
4
1
Centre for the Coordination of Alerts and Health Emergencies, General Directorate of
5
Public Health, Ministry of Health.
6
2
Vaccines division, General Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health.
7
3
Data analytics department, General Directorate of Digital Health and National Health
8
Service Information Systems, Ministry of Health.
9
* These persons contributed equally to this work.
10
11
Corresponding author:
12
Susana Monge
13
smonge@mscbs.es
14
15
Conflicts of interest: authors declare no support from any organisation for the
16
submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an
17
interest in the submitted work in the previous three years, no other relationships or
18
activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
19
20
Contributions: SM, CO, MJS and AL conceived the idea for the study. SM and CO
21
designed the analysis which was performed by SM with help from BA, support from
22
MFL and under the supervision of MJS and AL. All authors participated in the
23
interpretation of results and critically reviewed the content of the manuscript.
24
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 15, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.08.21255055doi: medRxiv preprint
NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice.

2
25
Funding: This work did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the
26
public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
27
28
Members of the COVID-19 registries study group: David Moreno, Manuel Méndez
29
Díaz, Ismael Huerta González, Antonia Galmes Truyol, Ana Barreno Estévez,
30
Valvanuz García Velasco, Jesús Rodríguez Recio, José Sacristán, Montserrat
31
Martínez Marcos, Eliseo Pastor Villalba , María José Macías Ortiz, Ana García Vallejo,
32
Sara Santos Sanz, Rocío García Pina , Aurelio Barricarte Gurea, Rosa Sancho Martínez,
33
Eva María Ochoa, Mauricio Vázquez Cantero, Atanasio Gómez Anés, María Jesús
34
Pareja Megía, Yolanda Castán, Manuel Roberto Fonseca Álvarez, Antonia Salvà Fiol,
35
Hilda Sánchez Janáriz, Luz López Arce, María Ángeles Cisneros Martín, José Sacristán,
36
Frederic Jose Gibernau, Cesar Fernandez Buey, Katja Villatoro Bongiorno, Francisco Javier
37
Rubio García, Fernando Santos Guerra, Jenaro Astray Mochales, Francisco Javier
38
Francisco Verdu, Isabel García Romero, Rosa Oriza Bernal, Tomás Gómez Pérez, Salomé
39
Hijano Villegas, Sergio Román Soto, Virgilio Yagüe Galaup, Mercedes Alfaro Latorre,
40
Marta Aguilera Guzmán, Belén Crespo Sánchez-Eznarriaga, Montserrat Neira León,
41
Noemí Cívicos Villa.
42
43
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 15, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.08.21255055doi: medRxiv preprint

3
Abstract
44
Objectives To estimate indirect and total (direct plus indirect) effects of COVID-19
45
vaccination in residents in long-term care facilities (LTCF).
46
Design Registries-based cohort study including all residents in LTCF 65 years offered
47
vaccination between 27 December 2020 and 10 March 2021. Risk of SARS-CoV-2
48
infection following vaccination was compared with the risk in the same individuals in a
49
period before vaccination. Risk in non-vaccinated was also compared to a period
50
before the vaccination programme to estimate indirect protection. Standardized
51
cumulative risk was computed adjusted by previous documented infection (before the
52
start of follow-up) and daily-varying SARS-CoV-2 incidence and reproductive number.
53
Participants 573,533 records of 299,209 individuals in the National vaccination registry
54
were selected; 99.0% had 1 vaccine-dose, 99.8% was Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2).
55
Residents mean age was 85.9, 70.9% were females. A previous SARS-CoV-2 infection
56
was found in around 25% and 13% of participants, respectively, at the time of vaccine
57
offer and in the reference period.
58
Main outcome measures Documented SARS-CoV-2 infection identified in the National
59
COVID-19 laboratory registry.
60
Results Total VE was 57.2% (95% Confidence Interval: 56.1%-58.3%), and was highest
61
28 days after the first vaccine-dose (proxy of 7 days after the second dose) and for
62
individuals naïve to SARS-CoV-2 [81.8% (81.0%-82.7%)] compared to those with
63
previous infection [56.8% (47.1%-67.7%)]. Vaccination prevented up to 9.6 (9.3-9.9)
64
cases per 10.000 vaccinated per day; 11.6 (11.3-11.9) if naïve vs. 0.8 (0.5-1.0) if
65
previous infection. Indirect protection in the non-vaccinated could only be estimated
66
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 15, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.08.21255055doi: medRxiv preprint

4
for naïve individuals, at 81.4% (73.3%-90.3%) and up to 12.8 (9.4-16.2) infections
67
prevented per 10.000 indirectly protected per day.
68
Conclusions Our results confirm the effectiveness of mRNA vaccination in
69
institutionalized elderly population, endorse the policy of universal vaccination in this
70
setting, including in people with previous infection, and suggest that even non-
71
vaccinated individuals benefit from indirect protection.
72
Key-words: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; vaccination; vaccine effectiveness; long-term care
73
facilities; elderly; indirect effects.
74
75
Key messages:
76
COIVD-19 vaccination reduced the risk of documented SARS-CoV-2 infection in
77
institutionalized elderly by 57.2% (56.1% to 58.3%), which increased to 81.2%
78
(80.2% to 82%) for the fully vaccinated.
79
In individuals naïve to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination reduced the risk by up to 81.8% and
80
averted up to 11.6 cases per 10,000 vaccinated persons per day.
81
Those with previous infection also benefited from a risk reduction of 57%, which
82
translated in less than 1 infection averted per 10,000 vaccinated persons per day.
83
Non-vaccinated individuals living in facilities where the majority (residents and
84
staff) had been vaccinated showed a risk reduction similar to those actually
85
vaccinated.
86
87
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 15, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.08.21255055doi: medRxiv preprint

5
MAIN TEXT
88
Introduction
89
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic up to March 7 2021, 18,927 residents in
90
long-term care facilities (LTCF) have died in Spain with confirmed COVID-19, and an
91
additional 10,492 have died with compatible symptoms [1]. This means a cumulative
92
mortality rate of 67 per 1,000 residents, accounting only for confirmed infections. This
93
high vulnerability is due to the higher risk of exposure in dependents living in a closed
94
institution but also to the higher severity of infection due to advanced age and
95
presence of comorbidities. Indeed, one on every 5 cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection died
96
in this setting [1].
97
COVID-19 vaccination in Spain started on December 27 with the Pfizer/BioNTech
98
(BNT162b2) vaccine, for which LTCF -both residents and workers- were the first priority
99
group [2]. The vaccination campaign coincided with the third COVID-19 epidemic wave,
100
with national 14-day cumulative incidence increasing from less than 250 cases per
101
100,000 population by the end of 2020 to more than 1,000 by the end of January 2021
102
[3]. Vaccination started in facilities considered at higher risk, such as those that had
103
never experienced a COVID-19 outbreak, had higher number of residents or more
104
difficulties for implementing prevention and control measures. Vaccination teams
105
visited the facilities and vaccination was universal, including those with previous SARS-
106
CoV-2 infection. Vaccination was only deferred in people with active infection and,
107
inconsistently, in people under quarantine. Acceptance has been very high, with 97.8%
108
of all institutionalized persons (any institution type) having received at least one
109
vaccine dose, and 88.8% two doses [4].
110
. CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted April 15, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.08.21255055doi: medRxiv preprint

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Vaccine effectiveness of the first dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2 against SARS-CoV-2 infection in residents of long-term care facilities in England (VIVALDI): a prospective cohort study.

TL;DR: The VIVALDI study as discussed by the authors investigated the effect of the first dose of the Oxford-AstraZeneca non-replicating viral-vectored vaccine (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19; AZD1222) and the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA-based vaccine (BNT162b2) in terms of PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV2 infection over time since vaccination.
Journal ArticleDOI

The efficacy and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines in reducing infection, severity, hospitalization, and mortality: a systematic review

TL;DR: A comprehensive systematic literature search revealed that the COVID-19 vaccines have successfully reduced the rates of infections, severity, hospitalization, and mortality among the different populations, and more efforts are required to test their effectiveness against the other newly emerging variants.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 hospitalisations and deaths in elderly long-term care facility residents, Spain, weeks 53 2020 to 13 2021.

TL;DR: The screening method and population-based data sources were used to obtain estimates of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness for elderly LTCF residents, and the estimates were 71%, 88%, and 97% against SARS-CoV-2 infections (symptomatic and asymptomatic), and CO VID-19 hospitalisations and deaths, respectively.
Journal ArticleDOI

Real-world effectiveness of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine: a meta-analysis of large observational studies.

TL;DR: In this article, the overall vaccine effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine from observational studies was summarized through meta-analyses with the random effects model, and the vaccine effectiveness was indicated as (pooled hazard ratio (HR) and pooled incidence rate ratio (IRR) at 95% confidence intervals.
Journal ArticleDOI

The indirect effect of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination on healthcare workers’ unvaccinated household members

TL;DR: In this paper , the direct and indirect effectiveness of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines in reducing SARS-CoV-2 infections among vaccinated healthcare workers and their unvaccinated household members was investigated.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in a Nationwide Mass Vaccination Setting.

TL;DR: This study in a nationwide mass vaccination setting suggests that the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine is effective for a wide range of Covid-19–related outcomes, a finding consistent with that of the randomized trial.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (7)
Q1. What are the contributions mentioned in the paper "Direct and indirect effectiveness of mrna vaccination against sars-cov-2 infection in long-term care facilities in spain" ?

Direct and indirect effectiveness of mRNA vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection 1 in long-term care facilities in Spain 2 Susana Monge1, Carmen Olmedo2, Belén Alejos, María Fé Lapeña3, María José Sierra1 *, 3 Aurora Limia2 * and the COVID-19 registries study group. 9 * These persons contributed equally to this work. 19 20 Contributions: SM, CO, MJS and AL conceived the idea for the study. It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. 

Indirect protection in the non-vaccinated could only be estimated 66for naïve individuals, at 81.4% (73.3%-90.3%) and up to 12.8 (9.4-16.2) infections 67 prevented per 10.000 indirectly protected per day. 

Acceptance has been very high, with 97.8% 108 of all institutionalized persons (any institution type) having received at least one 109 vaccine dose, and 88.8% two doses [4]. 

269 A study in LTCF in Connecticut experiencing COVID-19 outbreaks found a 63% 270 protection with partial vaccination (between 14 and 28 days of the first dose), close to 271 their estimates, with unchanged results after excluding those with previous infection 272 [9]. 

A 273 Danish study in pre-print [10], has found no protective effect of a first vaccine-dose, a 274 52% reduction in days 0-7 after the second dose and 64% beyond day 7. 

in a separate analysis the authors 214 found that previous infection in the reference period was associated to a risk reduction 215 of 86.6% (85.2%-87.8%), higher than the estimate for complete vaccination. 

A previous SARS-CoV-2 infection 56 was found in around 25% and 13% of participants, respectively, at the time of vaccine 57 offer and in the reference period.