Ensemble averaging stress–strain fields in polycrystalline aggregates with a constrained surface microstructure – Part 1: anisotropic elastic behaviour
read more
Citations
DAMASK – The Düsseldorf Advanced Material Simulation Kit for modeling multi-physics crystal plasticity, thermal, and damage phenomena from the single crystal up to the component scale
The role of heterogeneous deformation on damage nucleation at grain boundaries in single phase metals
Grain-scale experimental validation of crystal plasticity finite element simulations of tantalum oligocrystals
Polycrystal Plasticity: Comparison Between Grain- Scale Observations of Deformation and Simulations
The effect of crystallographic orientation on the micromechanical deformation and failure behaviors of DP980 steel during uniaxial tension
References
Electron Backscatter Diffraction in Materials Science
Micromechanics of Crystals and Polycrystals
Geostatistical Simulation: Models and Algorithms
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (9)
Q2. What is the usual strategy for a direct comparison between strain field measurements and finite element results?
The usual strategy for a direct comparison between strain field measurements and finite element results consists in producing a finite element mesh of the surface morphology of the observed grains and subjecting it to boundary conditions as close as possible to the experimental ones.
Q3. What is the effect of the constrained displacement on the microstructure?
The constrained displacement associated with the changes of the underlying microstructure leads to marked strain incompatibilities and strongly different local stress levels from one realization to another.
Q4. What is the definition of continuum crystal plasticity?
Continuum crystal plasticity takes the crystallographic nature of plastic slip into account via a set of slip variables γs associated with each slip system s.
Q5. What is the main problem in assessing the quality of the simulation results compared with the available?
The main problem in assessing the quality of the simulation results compared to the available experimental data such as strain and lattice rotation fields lies in the fact that the usually unknown actual 3D morphology of the grains can significantly affect the strain and lattice rotation fields at the surface.
Q6. How is the growth rate of the grain determined?
In the case of expanding grains, the growth rate chosen initially is kept constant for the subsequent layers until the depth z = d0/2 is reached in average.
Q7. how many grains are required to reach the stress–strain field at the constrained free surface?
The number of grains within the thickness must be large enough for the stress–strain field at the constrained free surface to be practically unaffected by a further increase of the thickness.
Q8. What is the process of convexifying grains?
The grains are replaced by their convex envelop; this convexifying procedure is run until all the grains in the volume are convex; this may require several iterations; if the procedure does not converge, the volume is excluded.
Q9. What is the quality of the description of the variables close to grain boundaries?
the quality of the description of the variables close to grain boundaries can be restored if the number of elements per grain is sufficiently high (Barbe et al., 2001b; Diard et al., 2005).