Growth morphologies, phase formation, optical & biological responses of nanostructures of CuO and their application as cooling fluid in high energy density devices
read more
Citations
CuO nanostructures: Synthesis, characterization, growth mechanisms, fundamental properties, and applications
Phase dependent thermal and spectroscopic responses of Al2O3 nanostructures with different morphogenesis.
Multiphase TiO2 nanostructures: a review of efficient synthesis, growth mechanism, probing capabilities, and applications in bio-safety and health
TiO2 nanoparticles induce DNA double strand breaks and cell cycle arrest in human alveolar cells
Development of highly sensitive and selective ethanol sensor based on lance-shaped CuO nanostructures
References
Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays
Toxic Potential of Materials at the Nanolevel
Thermal Conductivity of Heterogeneous Two-Component Systems
Calcium, ATP, and ROS: a mitochondrial love-hate triangle
Temperature dependence of thermal conductivity enhancement for nanofluids
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (17)
Q2. What are the future works in "Growth morphologies, phase formation, optical & biological responses of nanostructures of cuo and their application as cooling fluid in high energy density devices" ?
0, the formation of flake or ellipsoidal shaped particles is a consequence of further anisotropic growth of the Cu ( OH ) 2 nanoparticles bolstered by the more availability of the 2OH ions which help in bridging smaller subunits in a particular direction. The reason behind this anomalous behavior requires further experimental investigation. 51 The mean hydrodynamic diameter of CuO NPs corresponding to different synthesis pH ’ s in F12 media as measured by dynamic light scattering ( DLS ) were 238 nm ( pH 8. 5 ), 287 nm ( pH 10. 0 ), 245 nm ( pH 11. 25 ) and 489 nm ( pH 12. 0 ) while the zeta potential was 212. Table 1 Hydrodynamic diameter and the corresponding zeta potentials for the four different CuO nanoparticles synthesized under varying pH Nanoparticles Hydrodynamic diameter ( nm ) Zeta potential ( mV ) CuO NPs ( pH 8.
Q3. What is the morphology of CuO nanoparticles?
During the heating process, the Cu(OH)2 nanoparticles lose H2O molecules and transform into CuO while its morphology still remains.
Q4. Why do the Cu(OH)2 nanocrystals form a square structure?
Due to the solvating action when copper salt is dissolved in water, four water molecules surround the Cu2+ to form a square structure Cu(OH)4 22, and the other two water molecules locate at its axis.
Q5. What is the reason for the toxicity of CuO nanoparticles?
Earlier reports have indicated that bio-toxicity generated by CuO nanoparticles may be due to the release of soluble Cu2+ ions, which may enter the cells causing enhanced cytotoxicity.
Q6. What are the factors that have been taken into account by various researchers while interpreting their results?
The factors like size, shape, external agents, surface modulations etc. have all been taken into account by various researchers while interpreting their results.
Q7. What is the effective way to synthesize CuO nanoparticles?
Although CuO nanoparticles of multiple shapes and morphologies have previously been synthesized in various physical methods such as mechanical milling30 or simply heating an elemental copper substrate at 400–700 uC,31 solution phase chemical synthesis has arguably been the most effective way of synthesizing these nanoparticles with its cost effectiveness, control over morphology and excellent yield.
Q8. What is the role of nano CuO particles in industrial applications?
Although found to be potent for causing bio-adversity, the capability of these nano CuO particles in industrial applications, even at a very low concentration, is an important finding.
Q9. What is the reason for the TC increment of the nanofluids?
the nanofluids have given a positive response to the TC increment even at a very small concentration of these nanoparticles, which is very critical as a precaution against the feasible toxic effects of these particles.
Q10. What is the mechanism of the growth of CuO nanocrystals?
Since growth by oriented collision induced attachment is statistical, and generally leads to the formation of structures with random morphologies, the former mechanism seems to be the better suited to explain the aggregation of CuO nanocrystals into the 3D shapes the authors have obtained.
Q11. What is the growth rate of CuO nanocrystals?
This means that the two 2OH ions located at the axis are easily replaced and dehydrated to form CuO nanocrystallites, so that the growth rate along the axes is higher than in the plane.
Q12. What is the mechanism of the formation of dislocations in the bonding interfaces?
The presence of dislocations in the bonding interfaces (Fig. 9c) clearly proves that the leaves of CuO were formed by the oriented attachment mechanism, as the formation of dislocations in the bonding interfaces is a direct consequence of the oriented attachment growth.
Q13. How did the authors determine the intensity of the luminescence bands?
Here in this work the authors report CuO particles showing photoluminescentproperties and the intensity of these luminescence bands could be dictated by varying their shapes which the authors achieved by altering the process conditions.
Q14. What is the diffraction intensity of Cu(OH)3NO3?
It is worth mentioning that the XRD of this sample showed the presence of a mixed phase of Cu(OH)2 and Cu2(OH)3NO3, so the non-uniformity in the shapes can be attributed to the presence of two chemically distinguished components to some extent.
Q15. What is the unusual luminescence property of the nanorods?
The optical properties of these samples were explored via photoluminescence spectroscopy and the authors found that the particles with seed-like shape possessed the most impressive luminescence and the nanorods possessed the most unusual luminescence property among the various shapes of CuO.
Q16. What is the corresponding plane spacing of the monoclinic CuO structure?
1039 /C1R A00 710Fprominent nanocrystals (marked as A and B) with the corresponding plane spacing 0.25 nm and 0.23 nm of hkl (002) and (111) of the monoclinic CuO crystal structure, respectively.
Q17. What pH was the common for the formation of seed-like particles?
At pH 8.5, the formation of seed-like particles was observed (with width of these particles in the range of 70–200 nm and the length 200–550 nm).