scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Guidelines for human papillomavirus DNA test requirements for primary cervical cancer screening in women 30 years and older

TLDR
In this paper, the authors have developed guidelines for high-risk HPV test requirements for primary cervical screening and validation guidelines for candidate HPV assays, which are based on the data from various large screening studies and can be used to guide the translation of highrisk HPV testing into clinical practice by setting standards of test performance and characteristics.
Abstract
Given the strong etiologic link between high-risk HPV infection and cervical cancer high-risk HPV testing is now being considered as an alternative for cytology-based cervical cancer screening. Many test systems have been developed that can detect the broad spectrum of hrHPV types in one assay. However, for screening purposes the detection of high-risk HPV is not inherently useful unless it is informative for the presence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2/3) or cancer. Candidate high-risk HPV tests to be used for screening should reach an optimal balance between clinical sensitivity and specificity for detection of high-grade CIN and cervical cancer to minimize redundant or excessive follow-up procedures for high-risk HPV positive women without cervical lesions. Data from various large screening studies have shown that high-risk HPV testing by hybrid capture 2 and GP5+/6+-PCR yields considerably better results in the detection of CIN 2/3 than cytology. The data from these studies can be used to guide the translation of high-risk HPV testing into clinical practice by setting standards of test performance and characteristics. On the basis of these data we have developed guidelines for high-risk HPV test requirements for primary cervical screening and validation guidelines for candidate HPV assays.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The molecular biology of head and neck cancer

TL;DR: The recent literature on tumour heterogeneity, field cancerization, molecular pathogenesis and the underlying causative cancer genes that can be exploited for novel and personalized treatments of patients with HNSCC are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evidence regarding human papillomavirus testing in secondary prevention of cervical cancer.

TL;DR: There exists a substantial evidence base to support that HPV testing is advantageous both in triage of women with equivocal abnormal cytology, in surveillance after treatment of CIN lesions and in primary screening of women aged 30 years or older, however, the possible advantages offered by HPV-based screening require a well organised program with good compliance with screening and triage policies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis

TL;DR: HPV testing on a self-sample can be suggested as an additional strategy to reach women not participating in the regular screening programme, and some PCR-based HPV tests could be considered for routine screening after careful piloting assessing feasibility, logistics, population compliance, and costs.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans

TL;DR: This timely monograph is a distillation of knowledge of hepatitis B, C and D, based on a review of 1000 studies by a small group of scientists, and it is concluded that hepatitis D virus cannot be classified as a human carcinogen.
Journal ArticleDOI

Epidemiologic Classification of Human Papillomavirus Types Associated with Cervical Cancer

TL;DR: In addition to HPV types 16 and 18, types 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 68, 73, and 82Should be considered carcinogenic, or high-risk, types, and types 26, 53, and 66 should be considered probably carcinogenic.
Journal ArticleDOI

Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer

TL;DR: The new HPV-oriented model of cervical carcinogenesis should gradually replace older morphological models based only on cytology and histology, and can minimise the incidence of cervical cancer, and the morbidity and mortality it causes, even in low-resource settings.
Journal ArticleDOI

Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer

TL;DR: Currently, the clearest role for HPV DNA testing is to improve diagnostic accuracy and limit unnecessary colposcopy in patients with borderline or mildly abnormal cytologic test results.
Journal ArticleDOI

Human papillomavirus type distribution in invasive cervical cancer and high-grade cervical lesions: a meta-analysis update.

TL;DR: A meta‐analyses of HPV type distribution in invasive cervical cancer (ICC) and high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) identified a total of 14,595 and 7,094 cases, respectively, suggesting differences in type‐specific risks for progression.
Related Papers (5)