Large thermoelectric figure of merit at high temperature in Czochralski-grown clathrate Ba8Ga16Ge30
read more
Citations
New and Old Concepts in Thermoelectric Materials
Rationally Designing High-Performance Bulk Thermoelectric Materials
Nanostructured Thermoelectrics: Big Efficiency Gains from Small Features
Nanostructured Thermoelectrics: The New Paradigm?†
Nanotechnology-Enabled Energy Harvesting for Self-Powered Micro-/Nanosystems
References
Thin-film thermoelectric devices with high room-temperature figures of merit
CRC Handbook of Thermoelectrics
Cubic AgPbmSbTe2+m: Bulk Thermoelectric Materials with High Figure of Merit
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (15)
Q2. How many atoms of Ba8Ga16Ge30 were found to have an?
Disk samples cut from the crystal were found to have an S ranging from approximately −45 V/K at 300 K to between −150 and −300 V/K at 900 K.
Q3. How long and how wide can a Ba8Ga16Ge30 be grown?
A 46 mm long and 7–13 mm in diameter crystal of the clathrate Ba8Ga16Ge30 could successfully be grown as an n-type specimen using the Czochralski method.
Q4. How was the atmosphere of the chamber flushed?
The atmosphere of the MPCGS chamber was flushed with high-purity argon four times before the temperature was raised to the melting point of Ba8Ga16Ge30.
Q5. What was the density of the sample at room temperature?
The sample density at room temperature was more than 99% of the theoretical density indicating a low degree of voids and grain boundaries in the crystal.
Q6. What is the maximum value of x in Ba8Ga16Ge30?
temperature-dependent measurements of S, , and all showed evidence of a transition from extrinsic to intrinsic semiconductor behavior with increasing temperature suggesting an extrapolated maximum in ZT=1.63 around 1100 K.
Q7. What is the way to grow a Ba8Ga16Ge30?
Redistribution subject to AIP liccal calculations12 and experiments16 suggesting that p-type Ba8Ga16Ge30 clathrates give even higher ZT values than n-type, continued research on controlled crystal growth of clathrates is strongly encouraged.
Q8. Where was the TE of the disks evaluated?
The TE properties of the disks were evaluated as a function of temperature both at the German Aerospace Center, Cologne, Germany DLR , and at the Centre for Thermoelectric Engineering, Cardiff, UK NEDO .
Q9. What was the cp measurement for disks 15 and 18?
Since none of the disks satisfied the size restrictions for cp measurements, disks 10, 15, and 16 were ground and pressed to one single disk, which was used for the cp measurement.
Q10. How was the TE measured at NEDO?
The NEDO apparatus utilizes an alpha-sigma - probe, previously described in detail elsewhere.35 Thermal diffusivity Dth was measured at NEDO between front and back surfaces of the disk sample35using the laser flash technique, at nine equidistant tempera-loaded 06 Jul 2011 to 131.251.133.28.
Q11. How many TE measurements have been made at temperatures above 400 K?
Only a few TE characterization measurements have been made at temperatures above 400 K.14,16,26 Kuznetsov et al. reported a S of −66 V/K 300 K for a polycrystalline sample and with a maximum magnitude of −194 V/K at 740 K.26
Q12. What is the corresponding sign of the plateau observed for the disks 15 and 18?
For instance, a plateau was observed for at the highest measured temperature Fig. 2 b interpreted as the beginning of a transition from extrinsic to intrinsic semiconducting behavior.
Q13. How does the ZT value for the two disks compare?
Using the extrapolated values for S, , and the value for ZT reaches a maximum around 1100 K for both disks and becomes 1.25 and 1.63, respectively.
Q14. What temperature-dependent S values were observed on the two disks?
Temperature-dependent measurements could only be performed on two disks 15 and 18 due to size limitations of the equipment and were done in the temperature range from 300 to 1070 K, as shown in Fig. 2 b .
Q15. What is the difference in ZT between the two disks?
The observed differences in ZT between these disks originate from the difference in S rather than , which seems to be less affected than S by small variations in the elemental composition Table The author.