scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6-minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review

TLDR
A change of 14.0 to 30.5 m in the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the 6MWT may be clinically important across multiple patient groups.
Abstract
Rationale, aims, and objectives The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is widely used as a test of functional exercise capacity. Several studies have reported the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the 6MWT; however, the findings of the studies have not been examined in the context of one another. In this review, we aimed to summarize available information on the MCID for the 6MWT performed by patients with pathology. Methods Relevant literature was identified by searches of 3 electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health), examination of article reference lists, and consultation with an expert. Inclusion necessitated that articles (1) be original, full length, and peer reviewed, (2) report an MCID for the 6MWT, and (3) focus on adults with medical issues. Articles were excluded if the MCID was determined by a procedure other than receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Articles were abstracted for information on participants, interventions, 6MWT distance, and the determination of MCID. Quality was assessed using a hybrid 9-item (0- to 18-point) instrument. Results Six articles were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The populations studied included people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, coronary artery disease, diffuse parenchymal lung disease, and non–cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis and adults with fear of falling. Mean baseline 6MWT distances ranged from 295 to 551 m. The MCIDs for which the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was at least 0.70 ranged from 14.0 to 30.5 m. Conclusions Based on our findings, a change of 14.0 to 30.5 m may be clinically important across multiple patient groups.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

1-Minute Sit-to-Stand Test: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF PROCEDURES, PERFORMANCE, AND CLINIMETRIC PROPERTIES.

TL;DR: The literature provides considerable support for using the 1-MSTST to quantify exercise capacity, and broader use of this test may be indicated, particularly where space and time are limited.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Effects of Functional Training, Bicycle Exercise, and Exergaming on Walking Capacity of Elderly Patients With Parkinson Disease: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Single-blinded Trial

TL;DR: Eight weeks of exergaming can improve the walking capacity of elderly patients with Parkinson disease, and exergame training had similar outcomes compared with functional training and bicycle exercise.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires

TL;DR: The criteria can be used in systematic reviews of health status questionnaires, to detect shortcomings and gaps in knowledge of measurement properties, and to design validation studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Meaningful Change and Responsiveness in Common Physical Performance Measures in Older Adults

TL;DR: The magnitude of small meaningful and substantial individual change in physical performance measures is estimated and their responsiveness is evaluated to evaluate their responsiveness.
Journal ArticleDOI

Interpretation of quality of life changes.

TL;DR: Possible ways of evaluating quality of life measures in terms of patient-clinician interactions and how the clinician can assess the importance of these changes of QOL in Terms of treatment and management of disease are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Updating the minimal important difference for six-minute walk distance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

TL;DR: The use of 6MWD as a patient-important outcome in research and clinical practice and analysis of data from an observational study using distribution- and anchor-based methods establish the minimal important difference (MID) in persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Related Papers (5)