Non-coalescence of oppositely charged drops

TLDR: The observation of oppositely charged drops bouncing rather than coalescing in strong electric fields should affect the understanding of any process involving charged liquid drops, including de-emulsification, electrospray ionization and atmospheric conduction.

Abstract: The movement of drops in electric fields plays a role in processes as diverse as storm cloud formation, ink-jet printing and lab-on-a-chip manipulations. An important factor in practical applications is the tendency for adjacent drops to coalesce, usually assumed to be favoured if drops are oppositely charged and attracted to each other. Now Ristenpart et al. show that when oppositely charged drops move towards each other in an electric field whose strength exceeds a critical value, the drops simply 'bounce' off one another. This observation calls for a re-evaluation of our understanding of all processes involving electrically induced drop motion. Adjacent drops of fluid coalesce, and oppositely charged drops have long been assumed to experience an attractive force that favours their coalescence. However, here it is observed that oppositely charged drops moving towards each other in a strong electric field do not coalesce when the field strength exceeds a certain value but rather 'bounce' off one another. This observation calls for a re-evaluation of our understanding of processes such as storm cloud formation and ink-jet printing, which involve electrically induced droplet motion. Electric fields induce motion in many fluid systems, including polymer melts1, surfactant micelles2 and colloidal suspensions3. Likewise, electric fields can be used to move liquid drops4. Electrically induced droplet motion manifests itself in processes as diverse as storm cloud formation5, commercial ink-jet printing6, petroleum and vegetable oil dehydration7, electrospray ionization for use in mass spectrometry8, electrowetting9 and lab-on-a-chip manipulations10. An important issue in practical applications is the tendency for adjacent drops to coalesce, and oppositely charged drops have long been assumed to experience an attractive force that favours their coalescence11,12,13. Here we report the existence of a critical field strength above which oppositely charged drops do not coalesce. We observe that appropriately positioned and oppositely charged drops migrate towards one another in an applied electric field; but whereas the drops coalesce as expected at low field strengths, they are repelled from one another after contact at higher field strengths. Qualitatively, the drops appear to ‘bounce’ off one another. We directly image the transient formation of a meniscus bridge between the bouncing drops, and propose that this temporary bridge is unstable with respect to capillary pressure when it forms in an electric field exceeding a critical strength. The observation of oppositely charged drops bouncing rather than coalescing in strong electric fields should affect our understanding of any process involving charged liquid drops, including de-emulsification, electrospray ionization and atmospheric conduction.