Q2. What future works have the authors mentioned in the paper "Novel compound heterozygous pathogenic variants in nucleotide-binding protein like protein (nubpl) cause leukoencephalopathy with multi- systemic involvement" ?
Further studies with additional identified patients are needed to confirmed their hypothesize. This observation suggests that NUBPL is involved in the formation of both the peripheral and membrane arms of the enzyme. A current standard model suggests that partially assembled CIII2 is incorporated in CI+CIII2+CIV SC, before the insertion of the Rieske protein ( UQCRFS1 ), which is preferentially localized in SC rather than in free CIII2 [ 30 ]. In conclusion, their results confirm the role of NUBPL in the assembly of CI and suggest an involvement of the protein in the stability of the whole enzyme.
Q3. What is the common cause of CI deficiency?
Isolated mitochondrial CI deficiency (MIM# 252010), due to pathogenic variants in CI subunits or assembly factors, causes severe decrease of energy production and is the most common cause of OXPHOS disorders (Nouws, Nijtmans, Smeitink, & Vogel, 2012).
Q4. What is the CI function of the two pathogenic variants?
While the first pathogenic variant is localized in a Walker B motif essential for nucleotide bind, the second pathogenic variant is localized in proximity to the CxxC binding residues to the Fe-S clusters.
Q5. How many patients have been reported with variable disease course?
10 patients have been reported with variable disease course: four patients presented episodes of regression, two patients a progressive disease course; three had a stable disease course with acquisition of some milestones.
Q6. What is the role of the N module in the assembly of CI?
whilst the Q module is added to the membrane arm at an early stage, the insertion of the N module is one of the final steps of the complete assembly of CI (Guerrero-Castillo et al., 2017; SanchezCaballero et al., 2016).
Q7. What did the authors do to confirm the pathogenicity of the variants?
To further confirm the pathogenicity of the pathogenic variants, the authors performed complementation experiments by overexpressing NUBPL wild-type cDNA in patient’s and control fibroblasts by stable lentivirus transduction.
Q8. What is the effect of CI on the CI assembly pathway?
As expected, in the absence of CI there is a redistribution of the remaining complexes, which leads to an increase in CIII2 and CIII2+CIV species, while monomer CIV does not seem to be affected.
Q9. What is the role of NUBPL in the CI?
NUBPL has been identified as a CI assembly factor, involved in the insertion of 4Fe-4S clusters in the CI N module (Sheftel et al., 2009). and in two 4Fe-S metallated subunits of the Q module, NDUFS2 and NDUFS3 (Sanchez-Caballero, Guerrero-Castillo, & Nijtmans, 2016; Sheftel et al., 2009).
Q10. What was the reaction used to transfer the protein to the membrane?
Proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane (Immobilon-P #IPVH00010) at 100 V for 1 hour at 4°C in Tris-Glycine transfer buffer, 20% methanol, 0.25% SDS.
Q11. What is the role of the CI assembly pathway?
Previous structural analysis of CI by blue native gel electrophoresis in patients’ cells with pathogenic variants in N and Q module subunits has shown the accumulation of stable CI intermediates corresponding to the unconnected N module and to the incomplete membrane arm, which can contain also Q module subunits, such as NDUFA9 and NDUFS2 (Lazarou, McKenzie, Ohtake, Thorburn, & Ryan, 2007).
Q12. What is the effect of the two pathogenic variants on the CI?
SDS-PAGE based Western blot (WB) immunodetection showed strong reduction of the steady-state level of CI subunits localized in both the peripheral and membrane arms, suggesting a deleterious effect of the NUBPL pathogenic variants on thewhole enzyme (Figure 3A-S2).
Q13. What is the CI function of the respiratory chain complexes?
Spectrophotometric analysis of the respiratory chain complexes confirmed severe CI deficiency with 22% residual activity of patient’s vs controls’ fibroblasts (Figure 3G), whereas the activities of the other complexes, including those containing mtDNA encoded subunits, were normal.
Q14. What was the result of the MRI?
Follow-up brain MRI showed improvement of the cerebral white matter abnormalities, with decrease in both white matter swelling and extent of the signal abnormalities, whereas the cerebellar abnormalities had slightly worsened (Figure 2F-J).
Q15. What is the effect of digitonin on CI?
The analysis of mitochondrial complexes extracted with digitonin in 1D and 2D blue native gels allowed us to investigate the formation and the stability of supercomplexes in their patient cell line.
Q16. What is the effect of the two variants on the CI?
1st and 2nd dimension (1D and 2D) BN-PAGE analysis of DDMtreated samples demonstrated a dramatic reduction of the fully assembled CI in patient’s fibroblasts, whereas both CIII and CII, as well as CIV, holocomplexes were normal (Figures 3B and 3C).