Open Access
REVIEW ARTICLE Cloud Feedbacks in the Climate System: A Critical Review
TLDR
A review of cloud-climate feedbacks can be found in this paper, where it is argued that cloud feedbacks are likely to control the bulk precipitation efficiency and associated responses of the planet's hydrological cycle to climate radiative forcings.Abstract:
This paper offers a critical review of the topic of cloud–climate feedbacks and exposes some of the underlying reasons for the inherent lack of understanding of these feedbacks and why progress might be expected on this important climate problem in the coming decade. Although many processes and related parameters come under the influence of clouds, it is argued that atmospheric processes fundamentally govern the cloud feedbacks via the relationship between the atmospheric circulations, cloudiness, and the radiative and latent heating of the atmosphere. It is also shown how perturbations to the atmospheric radiation budget that are induced by cloud changes in response to climate forcing dictate the eventual response of the global-mean hydrological cycle of the climate model to climate forcing. This suggests that cloud feedbacks are likely to control the bulk precipitation efficiency and associated responses of the planet’s hydrological cycle to climate radiative forcings. The paper provides a brief overview of the effects of clouds on the radiation budget of the earth– atmosphere system and a review of cloud feedbacks as they have been defined in simple systems, one being a system in radiative–convective equilibrium (RCE) and others relating to simple feedback ideas that regulate tropical SSTs. The systems perspective is reviewed as it has served as the basis for most feedback analyses. What emerges is the importance of being clear about the definition of the system. It is shown how different assumptions about the system produce very different conclusions about the magnitude and sign of feedbacks. Much more diligence is called for in terms of defining the system and justifying assumptions. In principle, there is also neither any theoretical basis to justify the system that defines feedbacks in terms of global–time-mean changes in surface temperature nor is there any compelling empirical evidence to do so. The lack of maturity of feedback analysis methods also suggests that progress in understanding climate feedback will require development of alternative methods of analysis. It has been argued that, in view of the complex nature of the climate system, and the cumbersome problems encountered in diagnosing feedbacks, understanding cloud feedback will be gleaned neither from observations nor proved from simple theoretical argument alone. The blueprint for progress must follow a more arduous path that requires a carefully orchestrated and systematic combination of model and observations. Models provide the tool for diagnosing processes and quantifying feedbacks while observations provide the essential test of the model’s credibility in representing these processes. While GCM climate and NWP models represent the most complete description of all the interactions between the processes that presumably establish the main cloud feedbacks, the weak link in the use of these models lies in the cloud parameterization imbedded in them. Aspects of these parameterizations remain worrisome, containing levels of empiricism and assumptions that are hard to evaluate with current global observations. Clearly observationally based methods for evaluating cloud parameterizations are an important element in the road map to progress. Although progress in understanding the cloud feedback problem has been slow and confused by past analysis, there are legitimate reasons outlined in the paper that give hope for real progress in the future.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Role of Polar Amplification in Long-Term Surface Air Temperature Variations and Modern Arctic Warming
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used an extensive dataset of monthly surface air temperature (SAT) records (including previously unutilized) from high-latitude (>60°N) meteorological land stations.
Book
Parameterization Schemes: Keys to Understanding Numerical Weather Prediction Models
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a list of principal symbols and abbreviations for parameterization schemes and their application in the terrestrial environment, including land surface-atmosphere parameterizations, water-surface-layer and turbulence parameterizations.
Journal ArticleDOI
An Assessment of the Primary Sources of Spread of Global Warming Estimates from Coupled Atmosphere–Ocean Models
TL;DR: In this article, the authors defined and quantified the contributions from the classical feedback analysis framework for an ensemble of 12 third phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP3)/Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) coupled atmosphere-ocean GCMs.
Journal ArticleDOI
Surface Irradiances Consistent With CERES-Derived Top-of-Atmosphere Shortwave and Longwave Irradiances
Seiji Kato,Norman G. Loeb,Fred G. Rose,David R. Doelling,David A. Rutan,Thomas E. Caldwell,Lisan Yu,Robert A. Weller +7 more
TL;DR: In this article, a Lagrange multiplier procedure is used to objectively adjust inputs based on their uncertainties such that the computed TOA irradiance is consistent with CERES-derived irradiance to within the uncertainty.
Journal ArticleDOI
Evaluation of cloud and water vapor simulations in CMIP5 climate models using NASA “A-Train” satellite observations
Jonathan H. Jiang,Hui Su,Chengxing Zhai,V. S. Perun,Anthony D. Del Genio,Larissa Nazarenko,Leo J. Donner,Larry W. Horowitz,Charles J. Seman,Jason N. S. Cole,Andrew Gettelman,Mark A. Ringer,Leon D. Rotstayn,Stephen Jeffrey,Tongwen Wu,Florent Brient,Jean-Louis Dufresne,Hideaki Kawai,Tsuyoshi Koshiro,Masahiro Watanabe,Tristan L'Ecuyer,Evgeny Volodin,Trond Iversen,Helge Drange,Michel D. S. Mesquita,William G. Read,Joe W. Waters,Baijun Tian,João Paulo Teixeira,Graeme L. Stephens +29 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluate the accuracy of cloud water content (CWC) and water vapor mixing ratio (H2O) outputs from 19 climate models submitted to the Phase 5 of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5), and assess improvements relative to their counterparts for the earlier CMIP3.
References
More filters
Book
Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change
TL;DR: The most comprehensive and up-to-date assessment available for scientific understanding of human influences on the past present and future climate is "Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change" as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Influence of Pollution on the Shortwave Albedo of Clouds
TL;DR: In this article, it was shown that pollution can increase the reflectance (albedo) of clouds; by increasing the absorption coefficient it acts to decrease the reflectances, and that the former effect (brightening of the clouds in reflection, hence climatically a cooling effect) dominates for thin to moderately thick clouds.
Journal ArticleDOI
Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP
TL;DR: The progress report on the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) describes changes made to produce new cloud data products (D data), examines the evidence that these changes are improvements over the previous version (C data), summarizes some results, and discusses plans for the ISCCP through 2005.
Journal ArticleDOI
Radiative forcing and climate response
TL;DR: This paper examined the sensitivity of a climate model to a wide range of radiative forcings, including changes of solar irradiance, atmospheric CO2, O3, CFCs, clouds, aerosols, surface albedo, and a "ghost" forcing introduced at arbitrary heights, latitudes, longitudes, seasons, and times of day.
Journal ArticleDOI
The CloudSat mission and the A-train: a new dimension of space-based observations of clouds and precipitation
Graeme L. Stephens,Deborah G. Vane,Ronald J. Boain,Gerald G. Mace,Kenneth Sassen,Zhien Wang,Anthony J. Illingworth,Ewan O'Connor,William B. Rossow,Stephen L. Durden,Steven D. Miller,Richard T. Austin,Angela Benedetti,Cristian Mitrescu +13 more
TL;DR: CloudSat as discussed by the authors is a satellite experiment designed to measure the vertical structure of clouds from space, and once launched, CloudSat will orbit in formation as part of a constellation of satellites (the A-Train) that includes NASA's Aqua and Aura satellites, a NASA-CNES lidar satellite (CALIPSO), and a CNES satellite carrying a polarimeter (PARASOL).