Stigmatization of people with alcohol use disorders: An updated systematic review of population studies.
Carolin Kilian,Jakob Manthey,Jakob Manthey,Jakob Manthey,Sinclair Carr,Franz Hanschmidt,Jürgen Rehm,Sven Speerforck,Georg Schomerus +8 more
TLDR
In this article, the authors conducted a systematic search using Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed and PsycINFO (via Ovid), and Web of Science for population-based studies on the public stigma in AUD and at least 1 other mental health condition, published between October 1, 2010 and December 20, 2020.Abstract:
BACKGROUND We summarize research on the public stigmatization of persons with alcohol use disorder (AUD) in comparison with other mental health conditions and embed the results into a conceptual framework of the stigma process. METHODS We conducted a systematic search using Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed and PsycINFO (via Ovid), and Web of Science for population-based studies on the public stigma in AUD and at least 1 other mental health condition, published between October 1, 2010 and December 20, 2020, thus including all studies published since the last systematic review on this topic. The study is registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020173054). RESULTS We identified 20,561 records, of which 24 met the inclusion criteria, reporting results from 16 unique studies conducted in 9 different countries. Compared to substance-unrelated mental disorders, persons with AUD were generally less likely to be considered mentally ill, while they were perceived as being more dangerous and responsible for their condition. Further, the public desire for social distance was consistently higher for people with AUD. We found no consistent differences in the public stigma toward persons with AUD in comparison with other substance use disorders. CONCLUSION The stigmatization of persons with AUD remains comparatively high and is distinct from that of other substance-unrelated disorders.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The stigma of alcohol-related liver disease and its impact on healthcare.
Georg Schomerus,Anya Leonhard,Jakob Manthey,J. Morris,Maria Neufeld,Carolin Kilian,Sven Speerforck,Petr Winkler,Patrick W. Corrigan +8 more
TL;DR: A review summarises the evidence on stigma in healthcare and its implications for people with ALD, drawing from the literature on the stigma associated with mental illness and specifically, alcohol use disorder (AUD) as mentioned in this paper .
Journal ArticleDOI
Understanding Alcohol Use Disorder.
TL;DR: In this article , it is shown how impactful and consequential alcohol consumption is in many aspects of our everyday lives and how it has been a significant influence on varying social cultures for thousands of years.
Journal ArticleDOI
Hazardous drinking and alcohol use disorders
James MacKillop,Roberta Agabio,Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing,Markus Heilig,John F. Kelly,Lorenzo Leggio,Anne Lingford-Hughes,Abraham A. Palmer,C. D. Parry,Lara A. Ray,Jürgen Rehm +10 more
Journal ArticleDOI
Hazardous drinking and alcohol use disorders
James MacKillop,Roberta Agabio,Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing,Markus Heilig,John F. Kelly,Lorenzo Leggio,Anne Lingford-Hughes,Abraham A. Palmer,C. D. Parry,Lara A. Ray,Jürgen Rehm +10 more
Journal ArticleDOI
Clinicians’ perspectives and perceived barriers to caring for patients with alcohol use disorder and cirrhosis
Emily Thomas Johnson,Sumantra Monty Ghosh,Vijay J. Daniels,T. Cameron Wild,Puneeta Tandon,Ashley Hyde +5 more
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors used a qualitative descriptive approach to explore the experiences of clinicians who care for patients with cirrhosis and AUD in Alberta and found that significant barriers exist, including limited knowledge and resources, systemic challenges, and patient complexity.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic
TL;DR: While the kappa is one of the most commonly used statistics to test interrater reliability, it has limitations and levels for both kappa and percent agreement that should be demanded in healthcare studies are suggested.
Journal ArticleDOI
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.
Jonathan A C Sterne,Miguel A. Hernán,Barnaby C Reeves,Jelena Savović,Jelena Savović,Nancy D. Berkman,Meera Viswanathan,David Henry,Douglas G. Altman,Mohammed T. Ansari,Isabelle Boutron,James R. Carpenter,An-Wen Chan,Rachel Churchill,Jonathan J Deeks,Asbjørn Hróbjartsson,Jamie J Kirkham,Peter Jüni,Yoon K. Loke,Theresa D Pigott,Craig R Ramsay,Deborah L. Regidor,Hannah R. Rothstein,Lakhbir Sandhu,Pasqualina Santaguida,Holger J. Schünemann,Beverly Shea,Ian Shrier,Peter Tugwell,Lucy Turner,Jeffrey C. Valentine,Hugh Waddington,Elizabeth Waters,George A. Wells,Penny Whiting,Julian P T Higgins +35 more
TL;DR: Risk of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions is developed, a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness of interventions from studies that did not use randomisation to allocate units or clusters of individuals to comparison groups.
Journal ArticleDOI
Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement.
Gretchen A Stevens,Leontine Alkema,Robert E. Black,J. Ties Boerma,Gary S. Collins,Majid Ezzati,John Grove,Daniel R Hogan,Margaret C. Hogan,Richard Horton,Joy E Lawn,Ana Marušić,Colin Mathers,Christopher J L Murray,Igor Rudan,Joshua A. Salomon,Paul J. Simpson,Theo Vos,Vivian Welch +18 more
TL;DR: The Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting (GATHER) define best reporting practices for studies that calculate health estimates for multiple populations (in time or space) using multiple information sources.
Journal ArticleDOI
Stigma and prejudice: One animal or two?
TL;DR: A typology of three functions of stigma and prejudice is developed: exploitation and domination, norm enforcement, and disease avoidance - it is argued that attention to these functions will enhance the understanding of stigmatization and prejudice and the ability to reduce them.
Journal ArticleDOI
The effectiveness of interventions for reducing stigma related to substance use disorders: a systematic review
TL;DR: A range of interventions demonstrate promise for achieving meaningful improvements in stigma related to substance use disorders and the limited evidence indicates that self-stigma can be reduced through therapeutic interventions such as group-based acceptance and commitment therapy.