scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers on "Anthrax vaccines published in 2019"


Journal ArticleDOI
13 Dec 2019
TL;DR: These updated recommendations can be used by health care providers and guide emergency preparedness officials and planners who are developing plans to provide anthrax vaccine, including preparations for a wide-area aerosol release of B. anthracis spores.
Abstract: This report updates the 2009 recommendations from the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) regarding use of anthrax vaccine in the United States (Wright JG, Quinn CP, Shadomy S, Messonnier N. Use of anthrax vaccine in the United States: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices [ACIP)], 2009. MMWR Recomm Rep 2010;59[No. RR-6]). The report 1) summarizes data on estimated efficacy in humans using a correlates of protection model and safety data published since the last ACIP review, 2) provides updated guidance for use of anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA) for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and in conjunction with antimicrobials for postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), 3) provides updated guidance regarding PrEP vaccination of emergency and other responders, 4) summarizes the available data on an investigational anthrax vaccine (AV7909), and 5) discusses the use of anthrax antitoxins for PEP. Changes from previous guidance in this report include the following: 1) a booster dose of AVA for PrEP can be given every 3 years instead of annually to persons not at high risk for exposure to Bacillus anthracis who have previously received the initial AVA 3-dose priming and 2-dose booster series and want to maintain protection; 2) during a large-scale emergency response, AVA for PEP can be administered using an intramuscular route if the subcutaneous route of administration poses significant materiel, personnel, or clinical challenges that might delay or preclude vaccination; 3) recommendations on dose-sparing AVA PEP regimens if the anthrax vaccine supply is insufficient to vaccinate all potentially exposed persons; and 4) clarification on the duration of antimicrobial therapy when used in conjunction with vaccine for PEP.These updated recommendations can be used by health care providers and guide emergency preparedness officials and planners who are developing plans to provide anthrax vaccine, including preparations for a wide-area aerosol release of B. anthracis spores. The recommendations also provide guidance on dose-sparing options, if needed, to extend the supply of vaccine to increase the number of persons receiving PEP in a mass casualty event.

37 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
08 Feb 2019
TL;DR: Evaluation of a single intramuscular injection of recombinant B. anthracis-protective antigen formulated in the DPX delivery platform indicates that single-dose DPX-rPA is equally protective as two doses of AVA and could serve as pre-ex exposure and post-exposure prophylaxis.
Abstract: Anthrax is a serious biological threat caused by pulmonary exposure to aerosolized spores of Bacillus anthracis. Biothrax® (anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA)) is the only Food and Drug Administration-licensed vaccine and requires five administrations over 12 months with annual boosting to maintain pre-exposure prophylaxis. Here we report the evaluation of a single intramuscular injection of recombinant B. anthracis-protective antigen (rPA) formulated in the DPX delivery platform. Immune responses were compared to an alum-based formulation in mice and rabbits. Serological analysis of anti-rPA immunoglobulin G and toxin neutralization activity demonstrated higher responses induced by DPX-rPA when compared to rPA in alum. DPX-rPA was compared to AVA in rabbits and non-human primates (NHPs). In both species, DPX-rPA generated responses after a single immunization, whereas AVA required two immunizations. In rabbits, single injection of DPX-rPA or two injections of AVA conferred 100% protection from anthrax challenge. In NHPs, single-dose DPX-rPA was 100% protective against challenge, whereas one animal in the two-dose AVA group and all saline administered animals succumbed to infection. DPX-rPA was minimally reactogenic in all species tested. These data indicate that DPX-rPA may offer improvement over AVA by reducing the doses needed for protective immune responses and is a promising candidate as a new-generation anthrax vaccine. A lipid-based anthrax vaccine formulation offers immunity from the first injection. Bacillus anthracis is a lethal pathogen at high risk for use in biological warfare. The only FDA-licensed vaccine for anthrax, AVA, requires multiple doses over six months followed by regular boosters, indicating a need for rapidly immunizing vaccines. Genevieve Weir and Lisa MacDonald, from IMV Inc., with Canadian and US collaborators, here describe a prophylactic consisting of B. anthracis antigens suspended in a lipid-in-oil formulation. Their candidate, DPX-rPA, generated antigen-specific antibodies in rabbits and monkeys after one dose, compared to two for AVA. DPX-rPA also protected both species from B. anthracis spores after one dose. The results indicate that single-dose DPX-rPA is equally protective as two doses of AVA and could serve as pre-exposure and post-exposure prophylaxis. Future studies may confirm its potential as a vaccine for humans.

21 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This review is devoted to challenges and achievements in the design of vaccines based on the anthrax recombinant protective antigen (rPA), with a focus on problems of PA instability that are greatly enhanced when using aluminum adjuvants.
Abstract: Introduction: Anthrax is a dangerous bio-terror agent because Bacillus anthracis spores are highly resilient and can be easily aerosolized and disseminated. There is a threat of deliberate use of anthrax spores aerosol that could lead to serious fatal diseases outbreaks. Existing control measures against inhalation form of the disease are limited. All of this has provided an impetus to the development of new generation vaccines. Areas сovered: This review is devoted to challenges and achievements in the design of vaccines based on the anthrax recombinant protective antigen (rPA). Scientific databases have been searched, focusing on causes of PA instability and solutions to this problem, including new approaches of rPA expression, novel rPA-based vaccines formulations as well as the simultaneous usage of PA with other anthrax antigens. Expert opinion: PA is a central anthrax toxin component, playing a key role in the defense against encapsulated and unencapsulated strains. Subunit rPA-based vaccines have a good safety and protective profile. However, there are problems of PA instability that are greatly enhanced when using aluminum adjuvants. New adjuvant compositions, dry formulations and resistant to proteolysis and deamidation mutant PA forms can help to handle this issue. Devising a modern anthrax vaccine requires huge efforts.

20 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: ID–LFn exhibits equal protective efficacy in mice and possesses more stability as compared to PA along with the capability of recognizing PA, LF and EF at the same time, and can be considered as an improved vaccine against anthrax with better shelf life.
Abstract: Bacillus anthracis (BA), the etiological agent of anthrax, secretes protective antigen (PA), lethal factor (LF), and edema factor (EF) as major virulence mediators. Amongst these, PA-based vaccines are most effective for providing immunity against BA, but their low shelf life limits their usage. Previous studies showed that B-cell epitopes, ID II and ID III present in PA domain IV possess higher toxin neutralization activity and elicit higher antibody titer than ID I. Moreover, N-terminal region of both LF and EF harbors PA-binding sites which share 100% identity with each other. Here, in this study, we have developed an epitope-based chimeric vaccine (ID-LFn) comprising ID II-ID III region of PA and N-terminal region of LF. We have also evaluated its protective efficacy as well as stability and found it to be more stable than PA-based vaccine. Binding reactivities of ID-LFn with anti-PA/LF/EF antibodies were determined by ELISA. The stability of chimeric vaccine was assessed using circular dichroism spectroscopy. ID-LFn response was characterized by toxin neutralization, lymphocyte proliferation isotyping and cytokine profiling. The protective efficacy was analyzed by challenging ID-LFn-immunized mice with B. anthracis (pXO1+ and pXO2+). ID-LFn was found to be significantly stable as compared to PA. Anti-ID-LFn antibodies recognized PA, LF as well as EF. The T-cell response and the protective efficacy of ID-LFn were found to be almost similar to PA. ID-LFn exhibits equal protective efficacy in mice and possesses more stability as compared to PA along with the capability of recognizing PA, LF and EF at the same time. Thus, it can be considered as an improved vaccine against anthrax with better shelf life. ID-LFn, a novel multiepitope chimeric anthrax vaccine: ID-LFn comprises of immunodominant epitopes of domain 4 of PA and N-terminal homologous stretch of LF and EF. The administration of this protein as a vaccine provides protection against anthrax.

13 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
08 Oct 2019-Vaccine
TL;DR: Assessment of the immunogenicity and efficacy of the lyophilized formulation of the AV7909 vaccine candidate as compared with the liquid formulation in the guinea pig general-use prophylaxis (GUP) model demonstrated that there were no significant differences.

9 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results demonstrated that both vaccines can be used simultaneously without any interference with the FMD response, and the simultaneous administration with anthrax vaccine had a stimulating effect on the early (day 7 post-vaccination) virus neutralization antibody response to the F MD vaccine.
Abstract: Purpose Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) and anthrax are important diseases in sheep. Vaccination is a favorable strategy against both infections. Simultaneous administration of vaccines does generally not impede the immune responses of each other, although there are some exceptions, and it may help reduce the labor and costs of vaccination as well as distress on animals. Although oil adjuvant FMD vaccine has been tried with live anthrax vaccine in cattle, there are no reports on the simultaneous use of both vaccines in sheep. Materials and methods In this study, FMD seronegative sheep were used to investigate the impact of the simultaneous vaccination of FMD and anthrax on FMD antibody titers of sheep. Virus neutralization test and liquid phase blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were used to determine the antibody response to the FMD vaccine. Results The results demonstrated that both vaccines can be used simultaneously without any interference with the FMD response. Moreover, the simultaneous administration with anthrax vaccine had a stimulating effect on the early (day 7 post-vaccination) virus neutralization antibody response to the FMD vaccine. Conclusion The simultaneous use of the FMD and anthrax vaccines did not hinder the response to the FMD vaccine in sheep.

8 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The ability of r-PAbxpB to generate protective immune responses against both spores and toxin and provide significant protection suggests it as an efficient vaccine candidate against B. anthracis infection.
Abstract: Anthrax vaccines primarily relying only on protective antigen (PA), the cell binding component in anthrax toxins provide incomplete protection when challenged with spores of virulent encapsulated Bacillus anthracis strains. Alternatively, formaldehyde inactivated spores (FIS) or recombinant spore components generate anti-spore immune responses that inhibit the early stages of infection and augment the PA protective efficacy. In the present study domain IV of PA was spliced with exosporium antigen BxpB via a flexible G4S linker to generate a single functional antigen r-PAbxpB that was further assessed for its protective efficacy against anthrax toxins and spore infection. Immunization of mice with r-PAbxpB elicited significantly high titer antibodies comprising IgG1:IgG2a isotypes in 1:1 ratio, balanced up-regulation of both Th1 (IL2, IL12, IFN-γ) and Th2 (IL4, IL5, IL10) cytokines and high frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets. The anti-r-PAbxpB antibodies significantly enhanced spore phagocytosis, and killing within macrophages; inhibited their germination to vegetative cells and completely neutralized the anthrax toxins as evidenced by the 100% protection in passive transfer studies. Active immunization with r-PAbxpB provided 100 and 83.3% protection in mice I.P. challenged with 5 × LD100 LD of toxins and 5 × 104 cfu/ml Ames spores, respectively while the sham immunized group succumbed to infection in 48 h. Therefore, the ability of r-PAbxpB to generate protective immune responses against both spores and toxin and provide significant protection suggests it as an efficient vaccine candidate against B. anthracis infection.

4 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Findings suggested that PA-LF chimera of B. anthracis elicited good humoral as well as cell mediated immune response in mice, and thus, can be a potent vaccine candidate against anthrax.

4 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The overall results indicated a favorable safety profile for rPA7909, with no apparent systemic toxicity and only transient reactogenicity at the injection site.
Abstract: A recombinant protective antigen (rPA) anthrax vaccine candidate (rPA7909) was developed as a next-generation vaccine indicated for postexposure prophylaxis of disease resulting from suspected or confirmed Bacillus anthracis exposure. The lyophilized form of rPA7909-vaccinated candidate contains 75 µg purified rPA, 750 µg aluminum (as Alhydrogel adjuvant), and 250 µg of an immunostimulatory Toll-like receptor 9 agonist oligodeoxynucleotide CpG 7909 in a 0.5 mL phosphate-buffered suspension. General toxicity and local reactogenicity were evaluated in Sprague Dawley rats vaccinated with the full human dose of rPA7909 by intramuscular injection. Animals were immunized on study days 1, 15, and 29. Control groups were administered diluent only or adjuvant control (excipients, CpG 7909, and Alhydrogel adjuvant in diluent) intramuscularly at the same dose volume and according to the same schedule used for rPA7909. Toxicity was assessed based on the results of clinical observations, physical examinations, body weights, injection site reactogenicity, ophthalmology, clinical pathology (hematology, coagulation, and serum chemistry), organ weights, and macroscopic and microscopic pathology evaluation. The immune response to rPA7909 vaccination was confirmed by measuring serum anti-PA immunoglobulin G levels. The rPA7909 vaccine produced no apparent systemic toxicity and only transient reactogenicity at the injection site. The injection site reaction from animals receiving the adjuvant control was very similar to those receiving rPA7909 with respect to the inflammation. The inflammatory response observed in the injection site and the draining lymph nodes was consistent with expected immune stimulation. The overall results indicated a favorable safety profile for rPA7909.

4 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The research may have found the basis for in vivo research aimed at finding potential anthrax vaccine components.
Abstract: Existing research for using the protective antigen (PA) of Bacillus anthracis as a vaccine component shows that protection against anthrax may be obtained using fragments of this protein. The aim of the research is to check whether the selected protein fragment of the protective antigen (domain 4) encoded by an appropriate nucleotide sequence of gene pag of B. anthracis, was expressed in the bacterial system of E. coli. In order to examine the selected sequence of the pag gene, a PCR reaction and a highly effective TOPO cloning strategy were used, followed by purification of the recombinant proteins and their detection by a western-blot method. In the planning of the PA4 antigen expression a higher level of effectiveness in production of small protein - domain 4 - was anticipated. As a result, the 139 amino acids protein fragment of B. anthracis PA (domain 4) was isolated. The research may have found the basis for in vivo research aimed at finding potential anthrax vaccine components.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: PA-PEG is expected as an effective anthrax vaccine candidate with durable immunoprotection against anthrax and could elicit a robust anti-PA IgG and neutralization antibody response in the magnitude and quality.

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 2019
TL;DR: The results suggest that the Sterne vaccine is only effective as a subcutaneous injection and that an alternate oral anthrax vaccine formulation must be developed to allow for efficient vaccination of free-ranging livestock and wildlife.
Abstract: Anthrax (Bacillus anthracis) is a zoonotic disease endemic to environments worldwide. Spores, the dormant form of the bacteria, can survive for decades in nature’s harshest environments and maintain their viability to cause disease. Outbreaks are common in free-ranging livestock and wildlife, thus making anthrax an economically and ecologically important disease. The currently available vaccine to protect livestock is a suspension of B. anthracis Sterne Strain 34F2 spores in saponin (Sterne vaccine). However, it is only available as a subcutaneous injection which is an impractical method of prevention for wildlife. Oral vaccination is the ideal method for free-ranging wildlife, but the Sterne vaccine has never been thoroughly evaluated for oral administration. The current study evaluated the antibody titers induced in mice by subcutaneous or oral vaccination with three different doses of the Sterne vaccine. Results described here show a gradual increase in antibody titers at each time point following subcutaneous vaccination with all vaccine doses. In contrast, no antibody response was detected from any dose or any time point after oral vaccination. Taken together, these results suggest that the Sterne vaccine is only effective as a subcutaneous injection and that an alternate oral anthrax vaccine formulation must be developed to allow for efficient vaccination of free-ranging livestock and wildlife.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: No virulence recovery was identified in the involved anthrax vaccine strain; and no contamination of Bacillus anthracis was detected at the involved areas; and the university returned to normal functioning.

Posted ContentDOI
13 Nov 2019-bioRxiv
TL;DR: Long-term CD4+ T cell responses to PA epitopes are identified following cutaneous human anthrax infection and vaccination, indicating that this toxin component is a principle B. anthracis antigen.
Abstract: The causative agent of anthrax, Bacillus anthracis, evades the host immune response and establishes infection through the production of binary exotoxins composed of Protective Antigen (PA) and one of two subunits, lethal factor (LF) or edema factor (EF). The majority of vaccination strategies have focused upon the antibody response to the PA subunit. We have used a panel of humanised HLA class II transgenic mouse strains to define HLA-DR-restricted and HLA-DQ-restricted CD4+ T cell responses to the immunodominant epitopes of PA. This was correlated with the binding affinities of epitopes to HLA class II molecules, as well as the responses of two human cohorts: individuals vaccinated with the Anthrax Vaccine Precipitated (AVP) vaccine (which contains PA and trace amounts of LF), and patients recovering from cutaneous anthrax infections. The infected and vaccinated cohorts expressing different HLA types were found to make CD4+ T cell responses to multiple and diverse epitopes of PA. The effects of HLA polymorphism were explored using transgenic mouse lines, which demonstrated differential susceptibility, indicating that HLA-DR1 and HLA-DQ8 alleles conferred protective immunity relative to HLA-DR15, HLA-DR4 and HLA-DQ6. The HLA transgenics enabled a reductionist approach, allowing us to better define CD4+ T cell epitopes. Appreciating the effects of HLA polymorphism on the variability of responses to natural infection and vaccination will be vital in planning protective strategies against anthrax. Author Summary The bacterium responsible for causing the disease anthrax, Bacillus anthracis, produces a binary toxin composed of Protective Antigen (PA) and either Lethal Factor (LF) or Edema Factor (EF). Previous vaccination strategies have focused upon the antibody response to the PA subunit. However, within the field of bacterial immunity, there is a growing appreciation of the importance of the adaptive immune response, specifically led by CD4+ T cells. We identified long-term CD4+ T cell responses to PA epitopes following cutaneous human anthrax infection and vaccination, indicating that this toxin component is a principle B. anthracis antigen. To characterise the impact of polymorphism in HLA class II alleles at DR and DQ loci, we used transgenic mice to map the immunodominant epitopes from PA. This was correlated with survival in the transgenic lines following live anthrax challenge. We were able to demonstrate the differential impact of HLA class II alleles upon the CD4+ T cell immunodominant epitopes which shaped the immune hierarchy and therefore susceptibility to anthrax infection.