Showing papers on "Lopinavir/ritonavir published in 2017"

Refining criteria for selecting candidates for a safe lopinavir/ritonavir or darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy in HIV-infected virologically suppressed patients.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of treatment failure (TF) to protease inhibitor monotherapies (PI/r-MT) with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r). DESIGN: A multicenter cohort of HIV-infected patients with viral load (VL) ≤50 copies/mL, who underwent a switch from any triple combination therapy to PI/r-MT with either LPV/r or DRV/r. METHODS: VL was assessed in each center according to local procedures. Residual viremia was defined by any HIV-RNA value detectable below 50 copies/mL by a Real-Time PCR method. Standard survival analysis was used to estimate the rate of TF (defined by virological failure or interruption of monotherapy or reintroduction of combination therapy). A multivariable Cox regression analysis with automatic stepwise procedures was used to identify factors independently associated with TF among nadir and baseline CD4+ counts, residual viremia, time spent with <50 HIV-RNA copies/mL before switch, history of virological failure, HCV co-infection, being on a PI/r and hemoglobin concentrations at baseline. RESULTS: Six hundred ninety patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis. Their median follow-up was 20 (10–37) months. By month 36, TF occurred in 176 (30.2%; 95% CI:25.9–34.5) patients. Only CD4+ nadir counts (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 2.03 [95% CI: 1.35, 3.07] for counts ≤100 vs. >100 cells/μL) and residual viremia (aHR = 1.48 [95% CI: 1.01–2.17] vs. undetectable VL) were independently associated to TF. CONCLUSIONS: Residual viremia and nadir CD4+ counts <100 cells/μL should be regarded as the main factors to be taken into account before considering switching to a PI/r-MT.

Switching to Efavirenz Versus Remaining on Ritonavir-boosted Lopinavir in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-infected Children Exposed to Nevirapine: Long-term Outcomes of a Randomized Trial.

Abstract: Background We previously demonstrated the noninferiority of switching to efavirenz (EFV) versus remaining on ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) for virologic control in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and exposed to nevirapine (NVP) for prevention of mother-to-child transmission. Here we assess outcomes up to 4 years post-randomization. Methods From 2010-2013, 298 NVP-exposed HIV-infected children ≥3 years of age were randomized to switch to EFV or remain on LPV/r in Johannesburg, South Africa (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01146873). After trial completion, participants were invited to enroll into observational follow-up. We compared HIV RNA levels, CD4 counts and percentages, lipids, and growth across groups through four years post-randomization. Results HIV RNA levels 51-1000 copies/mL were less frequently observed in the EFV group than the LPV/r group (odds ratio [OR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.88, P = .004), as was HIV RNA >1000 copies/mL (OR 0.52 95% CI: 0.28-0.98, P = .04). The probability of confirmed HIV RNA >1000 copies/mL by 48 months was 0.07 and 0.12 in the EFV and LPV/r groups, respectively (P = .21). Children randomized to EFV had a reduced risk of elevated total cholesterol (OR 0.45 95% CI: 0.27-0.75, P = .002) and a reduced risk of abnormal triglycerides (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.29-0.62, P Conclusions Our results indicate that the benefits of switching virologically suppressed NVP-exposed HIV-infected children ≥3 years of age from LPV/r to EFV are sustained long-term. This approach has several advantages, including improved palatability, reduced metabolic toxicity, simplified cotreatment for tuberculosis, and preservation of second line options. Clinical trials registration NCT01146873.

Pharmacokinetics and Drug-Drug Interactions of Lopinavir-Ritonavir Administered with First- and Second-Line Antituberculosis Drugs in HIV-Infected Children Treated for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis.

Abstract: Lopinavir-ritonavir forms the backbone of current first-line antiretroviral regimens in young HIV-infected children. As multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB) frequently occurs in young children in high-burden TB settings, it is important to identify potential interactions between MDR-TB treatment and lopinavir-ritonavir. We describe the pharmacokinetics of and potential drug-drug interactions between lopinavir-ritonavir and drugs routinely used for MDR-TB treatment in HIV-infected children. A combined population pharmacokinetic model was developed to jointly describe the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and ritonavir in 32 HIV-infected children (16 with MDR-TB receiving treatment with combinations of high-dose isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, ethionamide, terizidone, a fluoroquinolone, and amikacin and 16 without TB) who were established on a lopinavir-ritonavir-containing antiretroviral regimen. One-compartment models with first-order absorption and elimination for both lopinavir and ritonavir were combined into an integrated model. The dynamic inhibitory effect of the ritonavir concentration on lopinavir clearance was described using a maximum inhibition model. Even after adjustment for the effect of body weight with allometric scaling, a large variability in lopinavir and ritonavir exposure, together with strong correlations between the pharmacokinetic parameters of lopinavir and ritonavir, was detected. MDR-TB treatment did not have a significant effect on the bioavailability, clearance, or absorption rate constants of lopinavir or ritonavir. Most children (81% of children with MDR-TB, 88% of controls) achieved therapeutic lopinavir trough concentrations (>1 mg/liter). The coadministration of lopinavir-ritonavir with drugs routinely used for the treatment of MDR-TB was found to have no significant effect on the key pharmacokinetic parameters of lopinavir or ritonavir. These findings should be considered in the context of the large interpatient variability found in the present study and the study's modest sample size.

Evaluation of pharmacokinetic interactions between long-acting HIV-1 fusion inhibitor albuvirtide and lopinavir/ritonavir, in HIV-infected subjects, combined with clinical study and simulation results.

Abstract: 1. A clinical study to assess the interactions between albuvirtide (320 mg) and lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100 mg) was conducted in 10 HIV-1-infected subjects. Because albuvirtide requires a long period to achieve steady state, and extended monotherapy may lead to early resistance, it is unethical to take albuvirtide alone to achieve steady state. Therefore, a population pharmacokinetic model was developed to predict steady-state concentration-time curve of solely administered albuvirtide. 2. When albuvirtide and lopinavir/ritonavir were co-administered, the plasma concentration of albuvirtide when the infusion ended (Cend) increased by about 34%, but the geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals (90% CIs) of AUC(0-t) [1.09 (0.96-1.24)] and Ctrough [1.00 (0.83-1.20)] were within the range of 0.8-1.25. For lopinavir, the ratios (90% CIs) of AUC(0-t), Cmax and Ctrough were 0.63 (0.49-0.82), 0.67 (0.53-0.86) and 0.65 (0.46-0.91); for ritonavir, those ratios (90% CIs) were 0.62 (0.42-0.91), 0.61 (0.38-0.99) and 0.72 (0.40-1.26), respectively. 3. Co-administration of albuvirtide with lopinavir/ritonavir has little effect on albuvirtide exposure, but it decreases the plasma exposures of lopinavir/ritonavir. However, the drug-drug interactions may not reduce the effectiveness of this co-therapy, the trough concentration of lopinavir may be sufficient and this combination could achieve similar clinical efficacy with marketed drugs. So, a phase 3 clinical trial without dose adjustment is underway to validate their effectiveness and safety.

Virological response and resistances over 12 months among HIV-infected children less than two years receiving first-line lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy in Cote d'Ivoire and Burkina Faso: the MONOD ANRS 12206 cohort.

Abstract: Introduction : Lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) is recommended for all HIV-infected children less than three years. However, little is known about its field implementation and effectiveness in West Africa. We assessed the 12-month response to lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy in a cohort of West African children treated before the age of two years. Methods : HIV-1-infected, ART-naive except for a prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT), tuberculosis-free, and less than two years of age children with parent’s consent were enrolled in a 12-month prospective therapeutic cohort with lopinavir/ritonavir ART and cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in Ouagadougou and Abidjan. Virological suppression (VS) at 12 months (viral load [VL] <500 copies/mL) and its correlates were assessed. Result s : Between May 2011 and January 2013, 156 children initiated ART at a median age of 13.9 months (interquartile range: 7.8–18.4); 63% were from Abidjan; 53% were girls; 37% were not exposed to any PMTCT intervention or maternal ART; mother was the main caregiver in 81%; 61% were classified World Health Organization Stage 3 to 4. After 12 months on ART, 11 children had died (7%), 5 were lost-to-follow-up/withdrew (3%), and VS was achieved in 109: 70% of children enrolled and 78% of those followed-up. When adjusting for country and gender, the access to tap water at home versus none (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.75, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09–6.94), the mother as the main caregiver versus the father (aOR: 2.82, 95% CI: 1.03–7.71), and the increase of CD4 percentage greater than 10% between inclusion and 6 months versus <10% (aOR: 2.55, 95% CI: 1.05–6.18) were significantly associated with a higher rate of VS. At 12 months, 28 out of 29 children with VL ≥1000 copies/mL had a resistance genotype test: 21 (75%) had ≥1 antiretroviral (ARV) resistance (61% to lamivudine, 29% to efavirenz, and 4% to zidovudine and lopinavir/ritonavir), of which 11 (52%) existed before ART initiation. Conclusions : Twelve-month VS rate on lopinavir/ritonavir-based ART was high, comparable to those in Africa or high-income countries. The father as the main child caregiver and lack of access to tap water are risk factors for viral failure and justify a special caution to improve adherence in these easy-to-identify situations before ART initiation. Public health challenges remain to optimize outcomes in children with earlier ART initiation in West Africa. Keywords HIV; children; early antiretroviral treatment; lopinavir; treatment outcomes; cohort; West Africa (Published: 25 April 2017) Amani-Bosse C et al. Journal of the International AIDS Society 2017, 20 :21362 http://www.jiasociety.org/index.php/jias/article/view/21362 | http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.01.21362

Impact of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms on Plasma Concentrations of Efavirenz and Lopinavir/ritonavir in Chinese Children Infected with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Abstract: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the genes that encode the cytochrome P450 (CYP) drug metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters have been reported to influence antiretroviral drug pharmacokinetics. Although primarily metabolized by CYP2B6 and -3A, efavirenz (EFV) and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) are substrates of P-glycoprotein and the solute carrier organic (SLCO) anion transporter, respectively. We investigated the association between SNPs and efavirenz (EFV) or lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) concentrations in Chinese children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Genotyping was performed on CYP2B6 516G→T, -1459C→T, and -983T→C, ABCB1 3435C→T, and SLCO1B1 521T→C in 229 HIV-infected Chinese pediatric patients (age range 4.0 to 17.5 yrs). Plasma concentrations of EFV and LPV/r were measured using validated high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with the mass spectrum method among 39 and 69 children who received EFV- and LPV/r-containing regimens, respectively. The frequencies of CYP2B6 516G→T in the study participants were 71%, 25%, and 4% for the G/G, G/T, and T/T genotypes, respectively. Among the children under therapeutic drug monitoring, 21% and 39% experienced EFV and LPV concentrations, respectively, above the upper threshold of the therapeutic window. CYP2B6 516G→T was significantly associated with EFV concentrations (p<0.001). Older children (older than 10 yrs) were more likely to have significantly higher EFV concentrations than the younger ones (p=0.0314). CYP2B6 genotyping and EFV concentration monitoring may help optimize antiretroviral therapy in pediatric patients who initiate an EFV-based regimen.

Randomized controlled trial of the tolerability and completion of maraviroc compared with Kaletra® in combination with Truvada® for HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (MiPEP Trial)

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for HIV is often poorly tolerated and not completed. Alternative PEP regimens may improve adherence and completion, aiding HIV prevention. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of a maraviroc-based PEP regimen compared with a standard-of-care regimen using ritonavir-boosted lopinavir. METHODS: Patients meeting criteria for PEP were randomized to tenofovir disoproxil/emtricitabine (200/245 mg) once daily plus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (Kaletra ® 400/100 mg) or maraviroc 300 mg twice daily. The composite primary endpoint was completion of 28 days of the allocated PEP regimen without grade 3 or 4 clinical or laboratory adverse events (AEs) related to the PEP medication. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirteen individuals were randomized (107 to maraviroc; 106 to Kaletra ® arm). Follow-up rates were high in both groups. There was no difference in the primary endpoint; 70 (71%) in the maraviroc and 64 (65%) in the Kaletra ® arm ( P = 0.36) completed PEP without grade 3 or 4 AEs. Discontinuation of PEP was the same (18%) in both groups. There were no grade 3 or 4 clinical AEs in either arm, but more grade 1 or 2 clinical AEs in the Kaletra ® arm (91% versus 70%; P < 0.001). Antidiarrhoeal medication use was higher in the Kaletra ® arm (67% versus 25%; P < 0.001). There were no HIV seroconversions in the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The completion rate in the absence of grade 3 or 4 AEs was similar with both regimens. Maraviroc-based PEP was better tolerated, supporting its use as an option for non-occupational PEP.

Impact of lopinavir-ritonavir exposure in HIV-1 infected children and adolescents in Madrid, Spain during 2000-2014.

Abstract: Background The most-used protease-inhibitor in children is Lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r), which provides durable suppression of viral load and increases CD4+T-counts. This study describes the virological outcome of the HIV-1-infected paediatric population exposed to LPV/r during 15 years in Spain. Methodology Patients from the Madrid Cohort of HIV-1-infected-children and adolescents exposed to LPV/r as different line therapy during 2000–2014 were selected. The baseline epidemiological-clinical features, viral suppression, changes in CD4+T-CD8+T cell counts and drug susceptibility were recorded before and during LPV/r exposure. Drug resistance mutations (DRM) were identified in viruses from samples collected until 2011. We predicted drug susceptibility to 19 antiretrovirals among those carrying DRM using the Stanford′s HIVdb Algorithm. Results A total of 199 (37.3%) of the 534 patients from the cohort were exposed to LPV/r during 2000–2014 in first (group 1), second (group 2) or more line-therapies (group 3). Patients were mainly Spaniards (81.9%), perinatally infected (96.5%) with subtype-B (65.3%) and HIV-diagnosed before year 2000 (67.8%). The mean age at first LPV/r exposure was 9.7 years. After protease-inhibitor exposure, viral suppression was higher in groups 1 and 2 than in group 3. Viral suppression occurred in 87.5%, 68.6% and 64.8% patients from groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Among the 64 patients with available resistance data during LPV/r treatment, 27(42.3%) carried DRM to protease-inhibitor, 28 (58.3%) to reverse-transcriptase-inhibitors and 21 (43.7%) to non-reverse-transcriptase-inhibitors. Darunavir/ritonavir, atazanavir-ritonavir and tipranavir/ritonavir presented the highest susceptibility and nelfinavir the lowest. Conclusions A better lymphocyte recovering occurred when protease-inhibitor was taken as part of a first-line regimen and a higher number of patients reached viral suppression. The least compromised antiretrovirals for rescue antiretroviral regimens, according to DRM in the LPV/r-exposed-paediatric cohort, were mainly the new protease inhibitors.

A Direct Comparison of the Effects of the Antiretroviral Drugs Stavudine, Tenofovir and the Combination Lopinavir/Ritonavir on Bone Metabolism in a Rat Model

Abstract: Antiretroviral (ARV) treatment may induce metabolic complications in HIV patients on long-term therapy that can affect bone health In this study, the effects of the ARVs Stavudine (d4T), Tenofovir (TDF) and Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) on bone metabolism and lipodystrophy were directly compared in rats to negate the consequences of HIV-associated confounding factors Healthy 12–14-week-old male Wistar rats (n = 40) were divided into four treatment groups and received an oral animal equivalent dose of either Stavudine (62 mg/kg/day), TDF (266 mg/kg/day), LPV/r (708 mg/kg/day) or water (Control 15 mL water/day) for a period of 9 weeks Whole-body DXA measurements, a biomechanical three-point breaking test and histomorphometric analysis were performed on the femurs and tibias at the end of the treatment period Stavudine monotherapy was found to be associated with decreased femoral bone mineral density that translated into reduced bone strength, whereas histomorphometric analysis demonstrated that Stavudine induces an imbalance in bone metabolism at tissue level, evident in higher resorption (eroded surfaces, osteoclast surfaces and osteoclast number) and lower formation parameters (osteoblast surfaces and osteoid surfaces) This was less clear in the rats treated with either TDF or LPV/r Furthermore, both Stavudine and TDF treatment resulted in significant bone marrow adiposity, although no significant redistribution of body fat was noted in the treated rats compared to controls The data from this study suggest that in the absence of HIV-associated factors, LPV/r is less detrimental to bone metabolism compared to Stavudine and TDF

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in human immunodeficiency virus-infected Chinese patients.

Abstract: Background: The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in Chinese adults infected with HIV is unknown.Methods: A pilot, prospective, open-label study was performed to investigate the steady-state PK profile of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in 15 Chinese HIV-infected patients among whom eight patients were treated with 300 mg tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, 300 mg lamivudine and 400/100 mg lopinavir/ritonavir, and seven with 300 mg tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, 300 mg lamivudine and 400 mg nevirapine. The plasma concentrations of tenofovir over the 24-h dosing interval were determined by HPLC. The PK parameters were calculated using the non-compartmental model in WinNonlin software.Results: The PK parameters of tenofovir in the 15 patients were determined as follows (mean ± SD): AUC(0-24 h), 4074.7 ± 1551.9 ng•h/mL; Cmax,ss, 447.1 ± 217.4 ng/mL; Ctrough,ss, 98.7 ± 36.7 ng/mL; tmax,ss, 1.3 ± 0.4 h; plasma t1/2, 21.8 ± 7.6 h; and CLss/F, 45.8 ± 13.0 L/h.Conclusion: Tenofovir de...

Sustained Viral Suppression in HIV-infected Children on Once-daily Lopinavir/Ritonavir in Clinical Practice.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The use of lopinavir/ritonavir once-daily (LPV/r QD) has not been approved for children. Good short-term clinical, virologic and immunologic outcomes have been observed in children on LPV/r QD. METHODS: We evaluated the long-term effectiveness of a LPV/r QD containing regimen in HIV-1-infected children in clinical practice. Selected children (0-18 years of age) with an undetectable HIV-1 RNA viral load ( 400 copies/mL twice within 6 months). Also, the exposure to LPV on the initial once-daily dosing regimen was determined. RESULTS: Forty children (median age: 6.5 years; range: 1.0-17) were included. Median follow-up was 6.3 years (range: 1.0-10.3). During yearly follow-up, the percentage of children with an undetectable viral load varied between 82% and 100% (on treatment) and 83% and 93% (last observation carried forward). Five children (12.5%) met the criteria for failure. CD4+ and CD8+ counts remained stable at normal values. Geometric mean LPV area under the plasma concentration-time curve (linear up-log down method) over a dosing interval from time 0 to 24 hours after dosing was 169.3 mg x h/L, and last observed drug concentration was 1.35 mg/L. Adverse events were encountered in 8 patients, were mainly gastrointestinal, and in these cases, no reason to stop treatment. CONCLUSION: A once-daily LPV/r-containing regimen in HIV-1-infected children with intensive clinical and therapeutic drug monitoring is well tolerated and has good long-term clinical, virologic and immunologic outcomes.

Farnesyltransferase inhibitors prevent HIV protease inhibitor (lopinavir/ritonavir)-induced lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome in mice.

Abstract: Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has successfully reduced the mortality rate of patients with human immune deficiency virus (HIV) and HIV protease inhibitors (HIV PIs) are key components of HAART. Complications of HAART, particularly those associated with HIV PIs including lipodystrophy and metabolic disturbance, have emerged as an important public health issue. No specific treatment is available to prevent and/or treat HIV PI-associated lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome. The present study demonstrated that a relatively low-dose of farnesyltransferase inhibitor (FTI), tipifarnib (3 mg/kg/day, subcutaneous injection) and lonafarnib (5 mg/kg/day, subcutaneous injection), prevented the onset of lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome induced by the combination of two HIV PIs, lopinavir (50 mg/kg/day, intraperitoneal injection) and ritonavir (12.5 mg/kg/day, intraperitoneal injection), in mice. Consistent with previous studies, treatment with lopinavir/ritonavir for 2 weeks decreased body weight, adipose tissue mass, levels of plasma adiponectin and leptin, and increased plasma levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol and insulin. Tipifarnib and lonafarnb prevented or ameliorated all of these alterations in the HIV PI-treated mice. These data identify FTIs as a novel potential strategy to prevent or treat HIV PI-associated lipodystrophy and metabolic syndrome in HIV-infected patients on HAART.

Effect of Coadministration of Etonogestrel Implant and AntiretroviralTherapies Containing Efavirenz or Lopinavir/Ritonavir on the Metabolismof Women Living with HIV/AIDS

Abstract: Background: Concomitant use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and hormonal contraceptives should be safe for women while maintaining medication efficacy without causing significant immunological or metabolic changes. However, the metabolic effect of the concomitant use of etonogestrel (ENG)-releasing implant and commonly used ARTs is not known. Objective: To evaluate the effect of coadministration of ENG-releasing implant and ARTs containing lopinavir/ ritonavir or efavirenz on the metabolic parameters of women living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection/ acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Methods: This is an open, prospective, non-randomized exploratory study. Forty-five women who sought to receive the ENG contraceptive implant were selected, including 15 non-ART users, 15 zidovudine/lamivudine (AZT/3TC)+lopinavir/ritonavir users and 15 AZT/3TC+efavirenz users for at least 3 months. Clinical and metabolic parameters were assessed before, during and 24 weeks after implant insertion. Results: At 24 weeks after ENG implant insertion, the group without ART showed a 4.7% increase in albumin level (p=0.03), a 6.2% decrease in total cholesterol level (p=0.03) and a 5.6% increase in alkaline phosphatase level (p<0.01), whereas the lopinavir/ritonavir group showed a 12.5% increase in aspartate aminotransferase (p=0.03). The efavirenz group showed a 12.9% decrease in low-density lipoprotein (p=0.03). The other results showed no significant changes during the 24 week study. The observed changes remained within the normal values for the parameters. Conclusion: Co-administration of ENG implant with ARTs containing lopinavir/ritonavir or efavirenz is not associated with clinically relevant metabolic changes in women living with HIV infection/AIDS, after a 6 month followup period.

A Pilot Study of Efficacy and Safety of Standard Dose of Lopinavir/Ritonavir in Combination with one Nonnucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor and one Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor in well Virology Suppressed HIV Infected Adults

Abstract: Background : Highly active antiretroviral therapy leads to long life of HIV-infected adults. More patients have co-morbid diseases which cause intolerance of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) toxicity. Due to limitation of available drug in Thailand, adjusting regimen to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) plus boosted protease inhibitor is another option. Objectives: To study the virological control and trough concentration (Ctrough) of lopinavir (LPV) in a combined regimen of one NNRTI, one NRTI and standard dose of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/rtv). Material and Methods: This study was a 52-week prospective clinical trial. Eligible patients were HIV - infected adults with plasma HIV RNA (pVL) 18 years, no history of LPV resistance and received a combined treatment of one NNRTI, one NRTI and LPV/rtv for at least 3 months. Patients with LPV/rtv 500mg/125 mg were adjusted to 400mg/100 mg. the other combined drugs, 1 NNRTI and 1 NRTI were continued. The primary outcome was virological control (pVL 1 mg/L. Results: Between November 2013 and April 2014, a total of 12 patients were screened and enrolled in this study. Seven patients received LPV/rtv 500 mg/125 mg before enrollment and five patients received LPV/rtv 400 mg/100 mg. Seven patients on nevirapine (NVP) and five patients on efavirenz (EFV). Eleven patients on lamivudine and one patient on tenofovir. Eleven of 12 patients had pVL 1 mg/L. Conclusion: NVP or EFV plus standard dose of LPV/rtv in Thai HIV infected adults with well virological suppress had efficacy in virological control with enough level of Ctrough of LPV.

Atherogenic properties of LDL particles after switching from Truvada or Kivexa plus lopinavir/r to lamivudine plus lopinavir/r: OLE-MET substudy.

Abstract: Background: The objective of this study was to determine the impact of tenofovir or abacavir discontinuation on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) phenotype and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (...