Danielle P. Ochoa

TL;DR: Men sometimes withdraw support for gender equality movements when their higher gender status is threatened as discussed by the authors, and this phenomenon was examined cross-culturally to test if both individual-and country-level variables predict men's collective action intentions to support gender equality.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present cross-cultural data on a brief measure of precarious manhood beliefs (the Precarious Manhood Beliefs scale [PMB]) that covaries meaningfully with other cross-culturally validated gender ideologies and with country-level indices of gender equality and human development.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined whether men's identification with women would predict their allied collective action, alongside moral convictions, efficacy, and anger, and also examined whether identification with their own ingroup would decrease their willingness to improve women's situation.

TL;DR: The authors empirically tested the universality of the effects of intent and personal force on moral dilemma judgements by replicating the experiments of Greene et al. in 45 countries from all inhabited continents and found that personal force and its interaction with intention exert influence on moral judgements in the US and Western cultural clusters, replicating and expanding the original findings.

TL;DR: Kashima et al. as mentioned in this paper presented a survey of the state-of-the-art universities in Malaysia, including the University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China, University of Salzburg, Salzberg, Austria, University Malaysia Sabah, Sabah University, Malaysia, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan,Sunway University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia; Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand, Rutgers University, New BrunswickNew Jersey, and Princeton University,