Institution
California Department of Food and Agriculture
Government•Sacramento, California, United States•
About: California Department of Food and Agriculture is a government organization based out in Sacramento, California, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Genus & Population. The organization has 449 authors who have published 980 publications receiving 16060 citations. The organization is also known as: CDFA & California Department of Agriculture.
Topics: Genus, Population, Monophyly, Species complex, Type species
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
Naturalis1, University of Helsinki2, American Museum of Natural History3, University of Copenhagen4, Institut national de la recherche agronomique5, Centre national de la recherche scientifique6, University of Maryland, College Park7, University of Oulu8, University of Turku9, National Sun Yat-sen University10, National Museum of Natural History11, University of Valencia12, Smithsonian Institution13, Sam Houston State University14, Royal Museum for Central Africa15, California Department of Food and Agriculture16, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research17, Florida Museum of Natural History18, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada19, National University of San Marcos20, Mississippi State University21, University of New Orleans22, Canadian Food Inspection Agency23
TL;DR: This dissertation aims to provide a history of web exceptionalism from 1989 to 2002, a period chosen in order to explore its roots as well as specific cases up to and including the year in which descriptions of “Web 2.0” began to circulate.
Abstract: van Nieukerken, Erik J.; Kaila, Lauri; Kitching, Ian J.; Kristensen, Niels Peder; Lees, David C.; Minet, Joël; Mitter, Charles; Mutanen, Marko; Regier, Jerome C.; Simonsen, Thomas J.; Wahlberg, Niklas; Yen, Shen-Horn; Zahiri, Reza; Adamski, David; Baixeras, Joaquin; Bartsch, Daniel; Bengtsson, Bengt Å.; Brown, John W.; Bucheli, Sibyl Rae; Davis, Donald R.; de Prins, Jurate; de Prins, Willy; Epstein, Marc E.; Gentili-Poole, Patricia; Gielis, Caes; Hättenschwiler, Peter; Hausmann, Axel; Holloway, Jeremy D.; Kallies, Axel; Karsholt, Ole; Kawahara, Akito Y.; Koster, Sjaak; Kozlov, Mikhail; Lafontaine, J. Donald; Lamas, Gerardo; Landry, JeanFrançois; Lee, Sangmi; Nuss, Matthias; Park, Kyu-Tek; Penz, Carla; Rota, Jadranka; Schintlmeister, Alexander; Schmidt, B. Christian; Sohn, Jae-Cheon; Solis, M. Alma; Tarmann, Gerhard M.; Warren, Andrew D.; Weller, Susan; Yakovlev, Roman V.; Zolotuhin, Vadim V.; Zwick, Andreas
450 citations
••
TL;DR: Although this species has been recorded from many US states and Canadian provinces, it has not been established in all of these places, and the main economic damage is restricted to the western part of North America.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Drosophila suzukii is an oriental species first reported outside Asia from Hawaii in 1980. The first confirmed records for the continental United States were made in 2008 in California. The identification of this pest is difficult because very few published resources exist.
RESULTS: It has since been recorded in Oregon, Washington, British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, Utah, Michigan, Wisconsin, Louisiana, North Carolina, South Carolina and Florida. Males are relatively easy to identify by the black apical wing spots and the single row of combs on the first and second tarsal segment of the fore leg. The male genitalia are also very characteristic and will aid in identifying teneral specimens. Females can be identified by the large ovipositor, which is 6–7 times as long as the diameter of the spermatheca. Immature stages can only be identified by molecular techniques.
CONCLUSION: Although this species has been recorded from many US states and Canadian provinces, it has not been established in all of these places, and the main economic damage is restricted to the western part of North America. With the characters laid out in this paper, it should be possible to identify the pest with high certainty. Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry
433 citations
••
Harvard University1, University of Memphis2, University of Texas at Austin3, University of Arizona4, Oregon State University5, California Department of Food and Agriculture6, University of Jena7, Clemson University8, University of California, Riverside9, Montana State University10, Wichita State University11, Landcare Research12, National University of La Plata13, University of Georgia14, Field Museum of Natural History15, Brigham Young University16, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation17
TL;DR: A phylogeny of beetles based on DNA sequence data from eight nuclear genes, including six single‐copy nuclear protein‐coding genes, for 367 species representing 172 of 183 extant families provides a uniquely well‐resolved temporal and phylogenetic framework for studying patterns of innovation and diversification in Coleoptera.
Abstract: © 2015 The Authors. Systematic Entomology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Entomological Society
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionߚNonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
419 citations
••
Daniel S. Karp1, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer2, Timothy D. Meehan3, Emily A. Martin4 +153 more•Institutions (81)
TL;DR: Analysis of the largest pest-control database of its kind shows that surrounding noncrop habitat does not consistently improve pest management, meaning habitat conservation may bolster production in some systems and depress yields in others.
Abstract: The idea that noncrop habitat enhances pest control and represents a win-win opportunity to conserve biodiversity and bolster yields has emerged as an agroecological paradigm. However, while noncrop habitat in landscapes surrounding farms sometimes benefits pest predators, natural enemy responses remain heterogeneous across studies and effects on pests are inconclusive. The observed heterogeneity in species responses to noncrop habitat may be biological in origin or could result from variation in how habitat and biocontrol are measured. Here, we use a pest-control database encompassing 132 studies and 6,759 sites worldwide to model natural enemy and pest abundances, predation rates, and crop damage as a function of landscape composition. Our results showed that although landscape composition explained significant variation within studies, pest and enemy abundances, predation rates, crop damage, and yields each exhibited different responses across studies, sometimes increasing and sometimes decreasing in landscapes with more noncrop habitat but overall showing no consistent trend. Thus, models that used landscape-composition variables to predict pest-control dynamics demonstrated little potential to explain variation across studies, though prediction did improve when comparing studies with similar crop and landscape features. Overall, our work shows that surrounding noncrop habitat does not consistently improve pest management, meaning habitat conservation may bolster production in some systems and depress yields in others. Future efforts to develop tools that inform farmers when habitat conservation truly represents a win-win would benefit from increased understanding of how landscape effects are modulated by local farm management and the biology of pests and their enemies.
398 citations
••
TL;DR: The species has been demonstrated to be distinct from B. tabaci (Gennadius) by crossing experiments, studies on intraspecific and interspecific mating behavior, analysis of allozymic frequencies, PCR analysis of genomic DNA, and morphological evaluation.
Abstract: Bemisia argentifolii Bellows & Perring, n. sp., is described from material collected in California and Florida. This species has been referred to elsewhere as B. tabaci strain B or B. tabaci poinsettia strain. The species has been demonstrated to be distinct from B. tabaci (Gennadius) by crossing experiments, studies on intraspecific and interspecific mating behavior, analysis of allozymic frequencies, PCR analysis of genomic DNA, and morphological evaluation. The description of the new species is based on morphological and allozymic characters. The species is distinguished from B. tabaci in the fourth nymphal instar by the absence of a dorsal seta, the width of the thoracic tracheal folds, the width of the wax extrusions from the tracheal folds, and, in the adult, by migration distances of allozymes for three enzyme systems.
380 citations
Authors
Showing all 450 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Sergei A. Subbotin | 34 | 184 | 4561 |
Hailu Kinde | 34 | 76 | 3386 |
Shaun L. Winterton | 25 | 113 | 2266 |
Douglas G. Luster | 21 | 70 | 1852 |
Charles H. Pickett | 21 | 42 | 955 |
Bruce R. Charlton | 20 | 60 | 1040 |
Maurice Pitesky | 19 | 52 | 1286 |
Randall J. Anderson | 19 | 26 | 848 |
David J. W. Morgan | 18 | 36 | 854 |
Stephen A. Marshall | 18 | 119 | 1451 |
Pamela J. Hullinger | 18 | 26 | 886 |
R. E. Breitmeyer | 16 | 19 | 1189 |
Riad Baalbaki | 15 | 21 | 716 |
Mohammad Athar | 15 | 48 | 719 |
Stephen D. Gaimari | 14 | 59 | 633 |