Institution
North Bristol NHS Trust
Healthcare•Bristol, United Kingdom•
About: North Bristol NHS Trust is a healthcare organization based out in Bristol, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Medicine. The organization has 2204 authors who have published 2811 publications receiving 61110 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: Seeing these activities as a form of anticipatory coping, and understanding the psychological reasons why women engage in these activities, may help nursing professionals to better support women through this often traumatic time.
102 citations
••
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre1, Lund University2, Paris Descartes University3, University of Oxford4, University of Manchester5, University of Pécs6, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg7, University of Zurich8, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust9, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust10, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre11, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy12, French Institute of Health and Medical Research13, McGill University14, University of Florence15, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine16, Oslo University Hospital17, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham18, St. Vincent's Health System19, University of Cologne20, University of Cambridge21, University of Nantes22, University of Liverpool23, Glasgow Royal Infirmary24, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust25, Stanford University26, University of Belgrade27, North Bristol NHS Trust28, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust29, The Queen's Medical Center30, University of Copenhagen31, University of East Anglia32, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases33, University of Giessen34, University of Lübeck35, Charité36, Royal Perth Hospital37, University of Limoges38, Lille University of Science and Technology39, Istanbul University40, James Cook University Hospital41, Royal Adelaide Hospital42, University of Gothenburg43, Monash University, Clayton campus44, University of Lyon45
TL;DR: Findings may support using immunosuppressants for early dcSSc but suggest that overall benefit is modest over 12 months and that better treatments are needed.
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The rarity of early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) makes randomised controlled trials very difficult. We aimed to use an observational approach to compare effectiveness of currently used treatment approaches. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational cohort study of early dcSSc (within three years of onset of skin thickening). Clinicians selected one of four protocols for each patient: methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclophosphamide or 'no immunosuppressant'. Patients were assessed three-monthly for up to 24 months. The primary outcome was the change in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS). Confounding by indication at baseline was accounted for using inverse probability of treatment (IPT) weights. As a secondary outcome, an IPT-weighted Cox model was used to test for differences in survival. RESULTS: Of 326 patients recruited from 50 centres, 65 were prescribed methotrexate, 118 MMF, 87 cyclophosphamide and 56 no immunosuppressant. 276 (84.7%) patients completed 12 and 234 (71.7%) 24 months follow-up (or reached last visit date). There were statistically significant reductions in mRSS at 12 months in all groups: -4.0 (-5.2 to -2.7) units for methotrexate, -4.1 (-5.3 to -2.9) for MMF, -3.3 (-4.9 to -1.7) for cyclophosphamide and -2.2 (-4.0 to -0.3) for no immunosuppressant (p value for between-group differences=0.346). There were no statistically significant differences in survival between protocols before (p=0.389) or after weighting (p=0.440), but survival was poorest in the no immunosuppressant group (84.0%) at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: These findings may support using immunosuppressants for early dcSSc but suggest that overall benefit is modest over 12 months and that better treatments are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02339441.
100 citations
••
TL;DR: Based on limited evidence, stent-assisted coiling shows similar immediate occlusion rates, improved progressive thrombosis and decreased aneurysm recurrence compared to coiling-only, but is associated with a higher mortality rate.
100 citations
••
TL;DR: Seven projects have been launched within the ND4BB programme, an Innovative Medicines Initiative, to boost the fight against ABR at every level from basic science and drug discovery, through clinical development to new business models and responsible use of antibiotics.
Abstract: Antibiotic resistance (ABR) is a global public health threat. Despite the emergence of highly resistant organisms and the huge medical need for new drugs, the development of antibacterials has slowed to an unacceptable level worldwide. Numerous government and non-government agencies have called for public-private partnerships and innovative funding mechanisms to address this problem. To respond to this public health crisis, the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking programme has invested more than €660 million, with a goal of matched contributions from the European Commission and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, in the development of new antibacterial strategies. The New Drugs for Bad Bugs (ND4BB) programme, an Innovative Medicines Initiative, has the ultimate goal to boost the fight against ABR at every level from basic science and drug discovery, through clinical development to new business models and responsible use of antibiotics. Seven projects have been launched within the ND4BB programme to achieve this goal. Four of them will include clinical trials of new anti-infective compounds, as well as epidemiological studies on an unprecedented scale, which will increase our knowledge of ABR and specific pathogens, and improve the designs of the clinical trials with new investigational drugs. The need for rapid concerted action has driven the funding of seven topics, each of which should add significantly to progress in the fight against ABR. ND4BB unites expertise and provides a platform where the commitment and resources required by all parties are streamlined into a joint public-private partnership initiative of unprecedented scale.
99 citations
••
TL;DR: This review will outline exemplar controlled and uncontrolled DCD pathways, highlighting practical and logistical considerations that minimize warm and cold ischemia times while addressing potential ethical concerns.
Abstract: The continuing shortage of deceased donor organs for transplantation, and the limited number of potential donors after brain death, has led to a resurgence of interest in donation after circulatory death (DCD). The processes of warm and cold ischemia threaten the viability of DCD organs, but these can be minimized by well-organized DCD pathways and new techniques of in situ organ preservation and ex situ resuscitation and repair post-explantation. Transplantation survival after DCD is comparable to donation after brain death despite higher rates of primary non-function and delayed graft function. Countries with successfully implemented DCD programs have achieved this primarily through the establishment of national ethical, professional and legal frameworks to address both public and professional concerns with all aspects of the DCD pathway. It is unlikely that expanding standard DCD programs will, in isolation, be sufficient to address the worldwide shortage of donor organs for transplantation. It is therefore likely that reliance on extended criteria donors will increase, with the attendant imperative to minimize ischemic injury to candidate organs. Normothermic regional perfusion and ex situ perfusion techniques allow enhanced preservation, assessment, resuscitation and/or repair of damaged organs as a way of improving overall organ quality and preventing the unnecessary discarding of DCD organs. This review will outline exemplar controlled and uncontrolled DCD pathways, highlighting practical and logistical considerations that minimize warm and cold ischemia times while addressing potential ethical concerns. Future perspectives will also be discussed.
99 citations
Authors
Showing all 2226 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Debbie A Lawlor | 147 | 1114 | 101123 |
Stephen T. Holgate | 142 | 870 | 82345 |
Paul Jackson | 141 | 1372 | 93464 |
E. Thomson | 103 | 992 | 51777 |
Paul Abrams | 91 | 505 | 51539 |
Susan M. Ring | 91 | 268 | 45339 |
Richard Baker | 83 | 514 | 22970 |
Seth Love | 74 | 344 | 30535 |
Kenneth R Fox | 70 | 269 | 19099 |
Evan L. Flatow | 70 | 245 | 15692 |
Paul Roderick | 67 | 392 | 20741 |
Robert J. Hinchliffe | 66 | 298 | 14818 |
Tim Cook | 61 | 340 | 14170 |
Jasmeet Soar | 57 | 252 | 20311 |
Salomone Di Saverio | 55 | 338 | 9123 |