scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Phoenix College published in 2015"


Journal ArticleDOI
Fredrick R. Schumacher1, Stephanie L. Schmit1, Shuo Jiao2, Christopher K. Edlund1, Hansong Wang3, Ben Zhang4, Li Hsu2, Shu Chen Huang1, Christopher P. Fischer5, John F. Harju5, Gregory Idos1, Flavio Lejbkowicz6, Frank J. Manion5, Kevin McDonnell1, Caroline McNeil1, Marilena Melas1, Hedy S. Rennert6, Wei Shi1, Duncan C. Thomas1, David Van Den Berg1, Carolyn M. Hutter7, Aaron K. Aragaki2, Katja Butterbach8, Bette J. Caan9, Christopher S. Carlson2, Stephen J. Chanock7, Keith R. Curtis2, Charles S. Fuchs10, Manish Gala10, Edward L. Giocannucci10, Stephanie M. Gogarten11, Richard B. Hayes12, Brian E. Henderson1, David J. Hunter10, Rebecca D. Jackson13, Laurence N. Kolonel3, Charles Kooperberg2, Sebastian Kury14, Andrea Z. LaCroix2, Cathy C. Laurie11, Cecelia A. Laurie11, Mathiew Lemire15, David K. Levine11, Jing Ma10, Karen W. Makar2, Conghui Qu2, Darin Taverna16, Cornelia M. Ulrich8, Cornelia M. Ulrich2, Cornelia M. Ulrich11, Kana Wu10, Suminori Kono17, Dee W. West, Sonja I. Berndt7, Stéphane Bézieau, Hermann Brenner8, Peter T. Campbell18, Andrew T. Chan10, Jenny Chang-Claude8, Gerhard A. Coetzee1, David V. Conti1, David Duggan19, Jane C. Figueiredo1, Barbara K. Fortini1, Steven Gallinger20, W. James Gauderman1, Graham G. Giles21, Roger C. Green22, Robert W. Haile23, Tabitha A. Harrison2, Michael Hoffmeister8, John L. Hopper24, Thomas J. Hudson15, Eric J. Jacobs18, Motoki Iwasaki25, Sun Ha Jee26, Mark A. Jenkins24, Wei Hua Jia27, Amit Joshi10, Li Li28, N. M. Lindor29, Keitaro Matsuo17, Victor Moreno, Bhramar Mukherjee5, Polly A. Newcomb2, John D. Potter2, Leon Raskin30, Leon Raskin1, Gad Rennert, Stephanie A. Rosse2, Gianluca Severi21, Robert E. Schoen31, Daniela Seminara7, Xiao-Ou Shu30, Martha L. Slattery32, Shoichiro Tsugane25, Emily White2, Yong-Bing Xiang, Brent W. Zanke33, Wei Zheng30, Loic Le Marchand3, Graham Casey1, Stephen B. Gruber1, Ulrike Peters2 
TL;DR: Six new susceptibility loci reaching a genome-wide threshold of P<5.0E-08 are described, providing additional insight into the underlying biological mechanisms of colorectal cancer and demonstrating the scientific value of large consortia-based genetic epidemiology studies.
Abstract: Genetic susceptibility to colorectal cancer is caused by rare pathogenic mutations and common genetic variants that contribute to familial risk. Here we report the results of a two-stage association study with 18,299 cases of colorectal cancer and 19,656 controls, with follow-up of the most statistically significant genetic loci in 4,725 cases and 9,969 controls from two Asian consortia. We describe six new susceptibility loci reaching a genome-wide threshold of P<5.0E-08. These findings provide additional insight into the underlying biological mechanisms of colorectal cancer and demonstrate the scientific value of large consortia-based genetic epidemiology studies.

150 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This study examines an ethnographically-collected set of social media posts from 5 applications in order to understand the rhetorical functions of something the authors call "metacommunicative" hashtags (e.g., #PackersGottaWinThisOne, #thisweddingisawesome).
Abstract: This study examines an ethnographically-collected set of social media posts from 5 applications in order to understand the rhetorical functions of something we call "metacommunicative" hashtags (e.g., #PackersGottaWinThisOne, #thisweddingisawesome). Through a process of inductive analysis, we identified recurring genre functions that are both context-specific to applications' ecologies and, at the same time, "stabilized enough" (Schryer, 1993, p. 204) to warrant the use of rhetorical genre theory as a tool for understanding their communicative purposes

36 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Medical Student Mentorship Program may serve as an effective pipeline program to promote future diversity in college and graduate training programs for future careers in science and medicine.
Abstract: Although the population of diverse applicants applying to medical school has increased over recent years (AAMC Diversity in Medical Education: Facts and Figures 2012); efforts persist to ensure the continuance of this increasing trend. Mentoring students at an early age may be an effective method by which to accomplish diversity within the applicant pool. Having a diverse physician population is more likely able to adequately address the healthcare needs of our diverse population. The purpose of this study is to initiate a pipeline program, called the Medical Student Mentorship Program (MSMP), designed to specifically target high school students from lower economic status, ethnic, or racial underrepresented populations. High school students were paired with medical students, who served as primary mentors to facilitate exposure to processes involved in preparing and training for careers in medicine and other healthcare-related fields as well as research. Mentors were solicited from first and second year medical students at the University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix (UACOM-P). Two separate cohorts of mentees were selected based on an application process from a local high school for the school years 2010–2011 and 2011–2012. Anonymous mentee and mentor surveys were used to evaluate the success of the MSMP. A total of 16 pairs of mentees and mentors in the 2010–2011 (Group 1) and 2011–2012 (Group 2) studies participated in MSMP. High school students reported that they were more likely to apply to medical school after participating in the program. Mentees also reported that they received a significant amount of support, helpful information, and guidance from their medical student mentors. Overall, feedback from mentees and mentors was positive and they reported that their participation was rewarding. Mentees were contacted 2 to 3 years post MSMP participation as sophomores or juniors in college, and all reported that they were on a pre-healthcare career track. The MSMP may serve as an effective pipeline program to promote future diversity in college and graduate training programs for future careers in science and medicine.

32 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Many R MR prediction equations have limited applicability for women at difference stages of the lifespan, thus impacting patient outcomes, and additional research is necessary to determine the appropriateness of RMR prediction equations among women of all ages.
Abstract: Background : Nutrition clinicians need accurate and reliable resting metabolic rate (RMR) assessments to determine energy needs and an appropriate nutrition care plan. Material/Methods : This cross-sectional study compared the accuracy of eight RMR prediction equations (Harris-Benedict, Robertson and Reid, Cunningham 1980, FAO/WHO/UNU, Owen, Mifflin-St. Jeor, Cunningham 1991, and Nelson) to measured RMR by indirect calorimetry among young (n=57; age: 25±3 years), midlife (n=57; age: 44±3 years), and older (n=46; age: 68±5 years) women. Paired t -tests examined differences between predicted and measured RMR. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 21), with significance defined as p<0.05. Bland-Altman plots displayed prediction bias and agreement. Prediction accuracy was defined when predicted RMR was ±10% of measured RMR. Serum thyroid stimulating hormone and follicle stimulating hormone concentrations were measured to assess thyroid function and ovarian reserve, respectively. Results : The difference between predicted and measured RMR ranged from +0.6% (Owen) to +17.7% (Cunningham 1980) for the young, -2.8% (Nelson) to +18.1% (Cunningham 1980) midlife, and +2.8 (Nelson) to +26.7% (Cunningham 1980) older women. For the young women, only the Owen equation predicted RMR similar to measured RMR (p=0.905). For the older women, only the Nelson equation predicted RMR similar to measured RMR (p=0.051). All estimates using prediction equations were significantly different from measured values for midlife women. Conclusion : Many RMR prediction equations have limited applicability for women at difference stages of the lifespan, thus impacting patient outcomes. Additional research is necessary to determine the appropriateness of RMR prediction equations among women of all ages.

1 citations