Institution
University of Akron
Education•Akron, Ohio, United States•
About: University of Akron is a education organization based out in Akron, Ohio, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Polymer & Polymerization. The organization has 17401 authors who have published 29127 publications receiving 702386 citations. The organization is also known as: The University of Akron.
Topics: Polymer, Polymerization, Natural rubber, Copolymer, Monomer
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: A review of the relevant works to date which have studied corrosion behaviour of nanocrystalline stainless steels, relating the performance to processing, along with attention given to mechanistic aspects which dictate corrosion, is given in this article.
239 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the interactive influence of two self-regulatory processes (goal-setting and metacognitive awareness) on students' performance was examined, and the interaction of being asked to set clearly defined goals and a tendency to develop a high degree of metACognitive awareness best facilitated individuals' performance on a decision-making task.
Abstract: To date, there have been few empirical studies that have examined multidimensional interactive models of self-regulated learning. This study tested the interactive influence of two self-regulatory processes—goal-setting and metacognitive awareness—on students' performance. Individuals (N = 89) were placed into one of four experimental groups based on their level of metacognitive awareness (high or low) and their participation in either a goal-setting intervention or a filler activity. All individuals then completed a novel decision-making task. As hypothesized, the interaction of being asked to set clearly defined goals and a tendency to develop a high degree of metacognitive awareness best facilitated individuals' performance on a decision-making task. Results provide initial support for multidimensional interactive self-regulatory models.
239 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, a theoretical relation has been derived for the equilibrium swelling of latex particles, and the equilibrium amount of solvent imbibed by latex particles is a direct function of the particle diameter and an inverse function of interfacial energy at the surface of the particles.
238 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the principle of varying selection pressure to keep weed communities off balance has been used to reduce weed densities, minimized crop yield losses, and inhibited adverse community changes toward difficult-to-control species.
Abstract: Cropping systems in the northern Great Plains (NGP) have evolved from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-fallow rotations to diversified cropping sequences. Diversification and continuous cropping have largely been a consequence of soil moisture saved through the adoption of conservation tillage. Consequently, weed communities have changed and, in some cases, become resistant to commonly used herbicides, thus increasing the complexity of managing weeds. The sustainability of diverse reduced tillage systems in the NGP depends on the development of economical and effective weed management systems. Utilizing the principle of varying selection pressure to keep weed communities off balance has reduced weed densities, minimized crop yield losses, and inhibited adverse community changes toward difficult-to-control species. Varied selection pressure was best achieved with a diverse cropping system where crop seeding date, perennation, and species and herbicide mode of action and use pattern were inherently varied. Novel approaches to cropping systems, including balancing rotations between cereal and broadleaf crops, reducing herbicide inputs, organic production, fall-seeded dormant canola (Brassica napus and B. rapa), and the use of cover crops and perennial forages, are discussed in light of potential systems-level benefits for weed management.
237 citations
••
Washington University in St. Louis1, University of California, Davis2, Emory University3, Université de Montréal4, Tom Baker Cancer Centre5, McGill University6, Cross Cancer Institute7, University of Michigan8, Oakland University9, University of Akron10, McMaster University11, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center12
TL;DR: Despite improvements in biochemical failure and distant metastases, dose escalation did not improve OS and high doses caused more late toxic effects but lower rates of salvage therapy.
Abstract: Importance Optimizing radiation therapy techniques for localized prostate cancer can affect patient outcomes. Dose escalation improves biochemical control, but no prior trials were powered to detect overall survival (OS) differences. Objective To determine whether radiation dose escalation to 79.2 Gy compared with 70.2 Gy would improve OS and other outcomes in prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants The NRG Oncology/RTOG 0126 randomized clinical trial randomized 1532 patients from 104 North American Radiation Therapy Oncology Group institutions March 2002 through August 2008. Men with stage cT1b to T2b, Gleason score 2 to 6, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 10 or greater and less than 20 or Gleason score of 7 and PSA less than 15 received 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy or intensity-modulated radiation therapy to 79.2 Gy in 44 fractions or 70.2 Gy in 39 fractions. Main Outcomes and Measures Time to OS measured from randomization to death due to any cause. American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO)/Phoenix definitions were used for biochemical failure. Acute (≤90 days of treatment start) and late radiation therapy toxic effects (>90 days) were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2.0, and the RTOG/European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Scheme, respectively. Results With a median follow-up of 8.4 (range, 0.02-13.0) years in 1499 patients (median [range] age, 71 [33-87] years; 70% had PSA P = .98). The 8-year cumulative rates of distant metastases were 4% for the 79.2-Gy arm and 6% for the 70.2-Gy arm (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-1.01; P = .05). The ASTRO and Phoenix biochemical failure rates at 5 and 8 years were 31% and 20% with 79.2 Gy and 47% and 35% with 70.2 Gy, respectively (both P P = .006 [HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.10-1.77] and P = .003 [HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.17-2.16], respectively). Conclusions and Relevance Despite improvements in biochemical failure and distant metastases, dose escalation did not improve OS. High doses caused more late toxic effects but lower rates of salvage therapy. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT00033631
236 citations
Authors
Showing all 17460 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Pulickel M. Ajayan | 176 | 1223 | 136241 |
Alan J. Heeger | 171 | 913 | 147492 |
Josef M. Penninger | 154 | 700 | 107295 |
Liming Dai | 141 | 781 | 82937 |
Chao Zhang | 127 | 3119 | 84711 |
Ulrich S. Schubert | 122 | 2229 | 85604 |
Vijay P. Singh | 106 | 1699 | 55831 |
Andrea Natale | 106 | 945 | 52520 |
Bruce J. Avolio | 105 | 220 | 69603 |
Thomas A. Lipo | 103 | 682 | 43110 |
Virgil Percec | 101 | 798 | 42465 |
Chang Liu | 97 | 1099 | 39573 |
Gareth H. McKinley | 97 | 467 | 34624 |
Paul J. Flory | 93 | 247 | 59120 |
Soo-Jin Park | 86 | 1282 | 37204 |