scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessProceedings ArticleDOI

Balancing uplink and downlink delay of VoIP traffic in WLANs using Adaptive Priority Control (APC)

TLDR
Adaptive Priority Control (APC) is introduced to balance the downlink and uplink delay of VoIP traffic at the MAC layer, by giving to the AP a higher transmission priority, which is adaptively decided according to the uplink and downlink traffic volume.

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Measurement and Analysis of the VoIP Capacity in IEEE 802.11 WLAN

TL;DR: While the 802.11e standard can protect the QoS of VoIP against TCP traffic, it does not improve the capacity due to the significant retransmissions during TXOP and the effect of the TCP traffic on VoIP traffic.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

WiFox: scaling WiFi performance for large audience environments

TL;DR: The solution WiFox is proposed, which adaptively prioritizes AP's channel access over competing STAs avoiding traffic asymmetry, and provides a fairness framework alleviating the problem of performance loss due to rate-diversity/fairness and avoids degradation due to TCP behaviour.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Experimental Measurement of the Capacity for VoIP Traffic in IEEE 802.11 WLANs

TL;DR: The capacity for VoIP traffic in an 802.11b test-bed is measured and factors that have been commonly overlooked in past studies but affect experiments and simulations are identified and corrections are made.
Journal ArticleDOI

An Asymmetric Access Point for Solving the Unfairness Problem in WLANs

TL;DR: The operation of an Asymmetric Access Point that benefits from a sufficient transmission capacity with respect to wireless stations so that the overall performance improves and is intrinsically adaptive so that when the access point does not need the increased capacity, it is used by wireless stations.
Proceedings Article

Softspeak: making VoIP play well in existing 802.11 deployments

TL;DR: Softspeak is proposed, a pair of backwards-compatible software extensions that enables VoIP traffic to share the channel in a more efficient, TDMA-like manner and significantly reduces the impact of VoIP on TCP capacity while simultaneously improving key VoIP call-quality metrics.
References
More filters

RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications

TL;DR: RTP provides end-to-end network transport functions suitable for applications transmitting real-time data over multicast or unicast network services and is augmented by a control protocol (RTCP) to allow monitoring of the data delivery in a manner scalable to large multicast networks.
Posted Content

A Quantitative Measure Of Fairness And Discrimination For Resource Allocation In Shared Computer Systems

TL;DR: A quantitative measure called Indiex of FRairness, applicable to any resource sharing or allocation problem, which is independent of the amount of the resource, and boundedness aids intuitive understanding of the fairness index.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Differentiation mechanisms for IEEE 802.11

TL;DR: This work presents three service differentiation schemes for IEEE 802.11 based on scaling the contention window according to the priority of each flow or user, and simulates and analyzes the performance of each scheme with TCP and UDP flows.
Journal Article

A Priority Scheme for IEEE 802. 11 DCF Access Method

TL;DR: This paper proposes a method to modify the CSMA/CA protocol such that station priorities can be supported, and results show that DCF is able to carry the prioritized traffic with the proposed scheme.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Understanding TCP fairness over wireless LAN

TL;DR: This paper identifies four different regions of TCP unfairness that depend on the buffer availability at the base station, with some regions exhibiting significant unfairness of over 10 in terms of throughput ratio between upstream and downstream TCP flows.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (17)
Q1. What are the contributions in "Balancinguplink anddownlink delay of voip traf c in wlans usingadaptive priority control (apc)" ?

In this paper, an adaptive priority control ( APC ) scheme is proposed to balance the downlink and uplink delay of VoIP traf c at the MAC layer, by giving to the AP a higher transmission priority which is adaptively decided according to the uplink and downlink trafc volume. 

When the priority of the AP is very high (P ≥ CWM The authorN ), CW decreases to 1, then the AP transmits packetsalmost without the backoff. 

This is because when more than one packetization interval is used, the traffic volume of uplink and downlink becomes more asymmetric, and APC changes the priority of the AP adaptively to the change of the uplink and downlink traffic volume, while the semi-adaptive method is adaptive only to the change of the number of active wireless nodes. 

The authors can calculate the number of the packets generated at the wireless nodes if the authors know the number of active wireless nodes, by dividing it by the packetization interval, and the authors can estimate the number of active wireless nodes by checking the received packets from wireless nodes. 

The authors have implemented the APC algorithm using the QualNet simulator and have shown that APC balances the uplink and downlink delay effectively in VoIP traffic with various packetization intervals. 

The authors measured the 90th percentile value 3 of the uplink and2PhysicalLayer ConvergenceProtocol 3Generally, 90th percentile value is used for measuringQoS of VoIPbecauseit indicatesthe jitter of VoIP applications. 

The authors assumed the codec delay to be about 30-40 ms at both the sender and the receiver, and the backbone network delay to be about 20 ms. 

The reason why the retry rate of the AP in APC is lower than that in DCF is that contention free transmission of the AP decreases the probability of packet collision. 

The authors added an additional 12 bytes to the1The t value is calculatedwith 160B (20ms packetization interval and G.711codec)payloadin 11Mb/s transmissionratepayload reflecting the overhead incurred by RTP [15] header. 

The queue size of the nodes is the number of packets generated in the application layer minus the number of packets sent to the AP. 

The authors plotted both the 90th percentile and average value of uplink and downlink delay because the 90th percentile value is a good measure of the capacity for the VoIP traffic, and the average value is used to check the balance of the uplink and downlink delay. 

N i j =1 ( t s P The authorj − Rj )N i where, Qi is the estimated average queue size of wireless nodes at i th sampling time, N i is the number of active wireless nodes at i th sampling time, ts is sampling interval in milliseconds, P The authorj is the packetization interval of the wireless nodes j in milliseconds, and R j is the number of packets the AP received from the wireless node j . 

The authors also evaluated the performance of APC with other packetization intervals, which decide the VoIP packet size and affect the capacity for VoIP traffic. 

The authors considered VoIP traffic with silence suppression, using the conversational speech model with double talk described in ITU-T P.59 [16]. 

In order to use the ratio of the queue size of the AP and a node as the priority value of the AP, the AP needs to know the queue size of all wireless nodes as well as the queue size of itself. 

downlink delay of voice packets, and defined the capacity of VoIP as the maximum number of wireless nodes so that the average of the 90th percentile of the one-way end-to-end delay for both direction does not exceed 60 ms.1) 

The reason is that even if the CW of the AP is changed to 1=P of CWM The authorN , the transmission rate of the AP is not exactly P times because the backoff time is chosen randomly within the CW size.