scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Boundary spanning at the science–policy interface: the practitioners’ perspectives

TLDR
It is suggested that boundary spanning has the potential to increase the efficiency by which useful research is produced, foster the capacity to absorb new evidence and perspectives into sustainability decision-making, enhance research relevance for societal challenges, and open new policy windows.
Abstract
Cultivating a more dynamic relationship between science and policy is essential for responding to complex social challenges such as sustainability. One approach to doing so is to “span the boundaries” between science and decision making and create a more comprehensive and inclusive knowledge exchange process. The exact definition and role of boundary spanning, however, can be nebulous. Indeed, boundary spanning often gets conflated and confused with other approaches to connecting science and policy, such as science communication, applied science, and advocacy, which can hinder progress in the field of boundary spanning. To help overcome this, in this perspective, we present the outcomes from a recent workshop of boundary-spanning practitioners gathered to (1) articulate a definition of what it means to work at this interface (“boundary spanning”) and the types of activities it encompasses; (2) present a value proposition of these efforts to build better relationships between science and policy; and (3) identify opportunities to more effectively mainstream boundary-spanning activities. Drawing on our collective experiences, we suggest that boundary spanning has the potential to increase the efficiency by which useful research is produced, foster the capacity to absorb new evidence and perspectives into sustainability decision-making, enhance research relevance for societal challenges, and open new policy windows. We provide examples from our work that illustrate this potential. By offering these propositions for the value of boundary spanning, we hope to encourage a more robust discussion of how to achieve evidence-informed decision-making for sustainability.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research

Albert V. Norström, +48 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose a set of four general principles that underlie high-quality knowledge co-production for sustainability research, and offer practical guidance on how to engage in meaningful co-productive practices, and how to evaluate their quality and success.
Journal ArticleDOI

Navigating a just and inclusive path towards sustainable oceans

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that despite growing concerns about exclusionary decision-making processes and social injustices, there remains inadequate attention to issues of social justice and inclusion in ocean science, management, governance and funding.
Journal ArticleDOI

Maximising the benefits of participatory climate adaptation research by understanding and managing the associated challenges and risks

TL;DR: In this article, the authors identify and articulate several challenges, and subsequent risks, created by participatory research approaches to adaptation (i) science, (ii) scientists and scientific institutions, (iii) decision-makers and decision-making institutions and (iv) research funders).
Journal ArticleDOI

Climate Services Can Support African Farmers' Context-Specific Adaptation Needs at Scale

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider the question of what is needed for climate services to support sub-Saharan African farmers' adaptation needs at the scale of the climate challenge, and discuss strategies for scaling up practices that meet farmers' needs, and opportunities to address long-standing obstacles.
Journal ArticleDOI

An introduction to achieving policy impact for early career researchers

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors draw on the literature and their own experiences working in the environmental sciences to provide an accessible resource for early career researchers seeking to achieve policy impact in their chosen field.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Science for the post-normal age

Silvio Funtowicz, +1 more
- 01 Sep 1993 - 
TL;DR: In this article, a new type of science called post-normal science is proposed to cope with many uncertainties in policy issues of risk and the environment, which can provide a path to the democratization of science, and also a response to the current tendencies to post-modernity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Knowledge systems for sustainable development

TL;DR: This study suggests that efforts to mobilize S&T for sustainability are more likely to be effective when they manage boundaries between knowledge and action in ways that simultaneously enhance the salience, credibility, and legitimacy of the information they produce.
Book

States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order

TL;DR: Jasanoff as mentioned in this paper discusses the science of science and political order in early twentieth-century France and America, focusing on the role of science in the formation of the European Environment Agency (EEA).
Journal ArticleDOI

Environment and development. Sustainability science.

TL;DR: This paper presents a meta-analyses of the chiral stationary phase of the LaSalle-Seiden–Seiden virus, which has implications for the design of vaccines and their application in the treatment of infectious disease.
Journal ArticleDOI

The politicization of climate change and polarization in the american public's views of global warming, 2001–2010

TL;DR: This paper examined political polarization over climate change within the American public by analyzing data from 10 nationally representative Gallup Polls between 2001 and 2010 and found that liberals and Democrats are more likely to report beliefs consistent with the scientific consensus and express personal concern about global warming than are conservatives and Republicans.
Related Papers (5)