scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Case-finding and genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia in primary care.

TLDR
In this paper, a case-finding tool (Familial Hypercholetserolaemia Case Ascertainment Tool, FAMCAT1) was applied to the electronic health records of 86,219 patients with cholesterol readings, identifying 3375 at increased risk of FH.
Abstract
Objective Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common inherited disorder that remains mostly undetected in the general population. Through FH case-finding and direct access to genetic testing in primary care, this intervention study described the genetic and lipid profile of patients found at increased risk of FH and the outcomes in those with positive genetic test results. Methods In 14 Central England general practices, a novel case-finding tool (Familial Hypercholetserolaemia Case Ascertainment Tool, FAMCAT1) was applied to the electronic health records of 86 219 patients with cholesterol readings (44.5% of total practices’ population), identifying 3375 at increased risk of FH. Of these, a cohort of 336 consenting to completing Family History Questionnaire and detailed review of their clinical data, were offered FH genetic testing in primary care. Results Genetic testing was completed by 283 patients, newly identifying 16 with genetically confirmed FH and 10 with variants of unknown significance. All 26 (9%) were recommended for referral and 19 attended specialist assessment. In a further 153 (54%) patients, the test suggested polygenic hypercholesterolaemia who were managed in primary care. Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels were higher in those patients with FH-causing variants than those with other genetic test results (p=0.010 and p=0.002). Conclusion Electronic case-finding and genetic testing in primary care could improve identification of FH; and the better targeting of patients for specialist assessment. A significant proportion of patients identified at risk of FH are likely to have polygenic hypercholesterolaemia. There needs to be a clearer management plan for these individuals in primary care. Trial registration number NCT03934320.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Algorithms for Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in Primary Care

TL;DR: FAMCAT2 was found to dominate (cheaper and more effective) cholesterol and FAMCAT1 algorithms, and extendedly dominate DLCN, and Simon Broome found the largest number of FH cases yet required 102 genetic tests to identify one FH patient.
Journal ArticleDOI

Introducing genetic testing with case finding for familial hypercholesterolaemia in primary care: qualitative study of patient and health professional experience

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors explored patient and health professional experiences of introducing genetic testing with case finding for familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) in primary care, and found that patients were unsurprised to be identified as being at risk, and positive about being offered genetic testing by their practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

Heartbeat: early intervention for rheumatic mitral stenosis.

TL;DR: Kang et al. as discussed by the authors compared early percutaneous mitral commissurotomy (PMC) to conventional care in rheumatic mitral stenosis patients and found that PMC-related complications, cardiovascular mortality, cerebral infarction and systemic thromboembolic events occurred in seven patients in the early PMC group (8.3%) compared with nine patients in conventional care group (10.8%) at a median follow-up of 6 years.
Journal ArticleDOI

Familial hypercholesterolaemia: genetic testing in general practice and beyond.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed a new approach to increase primary care involvement in diagnosing familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) by offering FH genetic testing through general practitioners (GPs).
Journal Article

Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Health Technology Assessment.

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors performed a systematic literature search and conducted a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis with a lifetime horizon from a public payer perspective, assuming the cost of genetic testing remains at $490 per person.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

TL;DR: Because of the increased complexity of analysis and interpretation of clinical genetic testing described in this report, the ACMG strongly recommends thatclinical molecular genetic testing should be performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments–approved laboratory, with results interpreted by a board-certified clinical molecular geneticist or molecular genetic pathologist or the equivalent.
Journal ArticleDOI

Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease: consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society

TL;DR: There is an urgent worldwide need for diagnostic screening together with early and aggressive treatment of this extremely high-risk condition, familial hypercholesterolaemia.
Journal ArticleDOI

Genetic Risk, Adherence to a Healthy Lifestyle, and Coronary Disease

TL;DR: Among participants at high genetic risk, a favorable lifestyle was associated with a nearly 50% lower relative risk of coronary artery disease than was an unfavorable lifestyle, and across four studies involving 55,685 participants, genetic and lifestyle factors were independently associated with susceptibility to coronary arteries disease.
Related Papers (5)